BM/WW IR sightings on TV

These slow burns take too damn long sometimes and right now that's the case with Legacies for me. MG and Lizzie should have a least kissed by now.
Amen amen and a-FREAKIN-men!!! I respect everybody's opinions, but I can't stand these "slow burns" anymore. If you really like WWBM relationships, why not see WWBM relationships? Why be content to spend years hoping the show doesn't get cancelled or thrown to an anti-IR showrunner before your favorite non-couple becomes a real thing? Why not prefer seeing them together in an actual happy relationship? I guess we all like different stuff lol
 
Upon further inspection of Lizzie Salzburg . . . she honestly is not nearly hot enough for Milton to have been longing for beyond season 1 of "Legacies". He made his play that fall and that was supposed to be that. She isn't as pretty as any of the random white girls walking around the hallways of that residential school. She has no physique at all . . . like whatsoever . . . and again there were prettier girls just sitting in the cafeteria or library.
So it didn't make sense considering her personality left so much to be desired as she was facially average . . . no Claire, Ivy or Topanga (beautiful inside & out).

Ouch! lol.

I like Lizzie. She grew on me. Made us all see that she was right about Hope and her muppet. lol.

Yeah see, this is a perfect example of people liking different things lol. I think Lizzie is gorgeous. I agree her personality can be trash (though I've only seen a few episodes), but I could definitely get into her looks-wise. Maybe it's because she kinda reminds me of a few chicks I knew back in school who left me with some happy memories. Regardless I dig the tall, slim (kinda) athletic look.

Edit: This seriously isn't good enough for y'all???
1118full-jenny-boyd.jpg


1582694755Jenny%20Boyd.jpg


9c2318b1dd24a03a34e5d7563e53466b.jpg


Jenny-Boyd-Without-Cosmetics-660x400.jpg


Jenny-Boyd-No-Makeup.jpg


OIP.HefLtCwWoVueNj-sil8ExQHaJP


WARNING!!! There's nudity under the spoiler tag! I normally wouldn't go this far, but I feel strongly about this one LOL
 
Last edited:
Amen amen and a-FREAKIN-men!!! I respect everybody's opinions, but I can't stand these "slow burns" anymore. If you really like WWBM relationships, why not see WWBM relationships? Why be content to spend years hoping the show doesn't get cancelled or thrown to an anti-IR showrunner before your favorite non-couple becomes a real thing? Why not prefer seeing them together in an actual happy relationship? I guess we all like different stuff lol
Maybe I'm impatient but I don't think it should take four damn seasons for a potential couple to get together. I get really annoyed when they throw other people in the path of a potential couple and Legacies might be going down that road.
 
I saw TRoS clip, there is a BM/WW, i'm not sure if they are just friends who later can start a relationship but i usually enjoy "the friends to lovers" thing. I think you can have a slow burn narrative and feel natural when the characters have a previous friendship or became friends before fall for each other. Well, it's a CW tv show, seems like they don't have a great past with IR, so i'm not having high hopes lol

It is made pretty obvious in the first episode there is mutual interest from Sarah and Grover (the WW/BM mentioned). But there is something holding one back from initiating anything more than friendship. But it feels like it's inevitable that they become a couple to me

I got the same feeling from their interactions.
LOL, @LucasBanner you didn't need to spoiler that post because everything you said was already revealed in that March 2020 Deadline.com casting info article I posted in this thread last month.

The only new detail from the series premiere that we didn't know from the deadline article or the trailer is that that Sarah's best friend is openly rooting for Sarah & Grover to be a couple.

Amen amen and a-FREAKIN-men!!! I respect everybody's opinions, but I can't stand these "slow burns" anymore. If you really like WWBM relationships, why not see WWBM relationships? Why be content to spend years hoping the show doesn't get cancelled or thrown to an anti-IR showrunner before your favorite non-couple becomes a real thing? Why not prefer seeing them together in an actual happy relationship? I guess we all like different stuff lol
@qaz1 You jumping in on "The Republic of Sarah" too?
 
Maybe I'm impatient but I don't think it should take four damn seasons for a potential couple to get together. I get really annoyed when they throw other people in the path of a potential couple and Legacies might be going down that road.
4 seasons seems to much only to wait for a fictional relationship lol. I was thinking something like 2 seasons, the first one being the "working progress" to be a future couple. This TRoS is a new TV show, first they need get a loyal fan base to get a season 2 or they can be another cancelled show and since this is CW i'm expecting the usual "on and off relationship" season after season only to bring more drama. I hate the "on and off" shit lol
 
Last edited:
4 seasons seems to much only to wait for a fictional relationship lol. I was thinking something like 2 seasons, the first one being the "working progress" to be a future couple. This TRoS is a new TV show, first they need get a loyal fan base to get a season 2 or they can be another cancelled show and since this is CW i'm expecting the usual "on and off relationship" season after season only to bring more drama. I hate the "on and off" shit lol
Oh I'm sorry I meant it shouldn't take four seasons and your right that is way too long.
 
4 seasons seems to much only to wait for a fictional relationship lol. I was thinking something like 2 seasons, the first one being the "working progress" to be a future couple. This TRoS is a new TV show, first they need get a loyal fan base to get a season 2 or they can be another cancelled show and since this is CW i'm expecting the usual "on and off relationship" season after season only to bring more drama. I hate the "on and off" shit lol
Nah I'm saying they get half a season TOPS lol! I get wanting to "see how they began" and all, but I much prefer seeing them in the actual relationship. If the writers have to fall back on these tired cliches, they're bad writers.
 
On Lizzie Too Flat with nothing to compensate. Also its Plec who I don't trust at all. And a massive slow burn for no reason. As I said with Leverage its one thing to slowburn Parker and Hardison because Parker is neurotypical and had such a weird childhood that she is just not "normal." this case absurd.

On Republic of Sarah seems like a bit of a slowburn but the only other dude in her age group around is her brother so looks pretty good to occur.
 
On Lizzie Too Flat with nothing to compensate. Also its Plec who I don't trust at all. And a massive slow burn for no reason. As I said with Leverage its one thing to slowburn Parker and Hardison because Parker is neurotypical and had such a weird childhood that she is just not "normal." this case absurd.

On Republic of Sarah seems like a bit of a slowburn but the only other dude in her age group around is her brother so looks pretty good to occur.

I get how Lizzie might not be everyone's type. I just don't see how anyone finds her UNattractive. There are beautiful actresses and models that I'm not really feeling, even though I admit they're objectively attractive (easy example: Gisele Bundchen, she just ain't my cup o tea). But it doesn't matter. Like what you like lol

I see the difference with Parker on 'Leverage' for sure. But wouldn't it have been better if we got to spend several seasons watching her and Hardison build an amazing relationship, instead of just hoping they might start one someday?

Also, about 'The Republic of Sarah,' don't let Hollywood fool you! They're good at giving a ww "no other good options" and making you think it's only a matter of time til she's booed up with the brother.... then here comes a new recurring character. All of a sudden things are going the opposite direction. **smh**

I remember HBO's 'Weeds' pulling a similar trick between seasons 1 and 2.
In fact! I know ya'll remember 'Life Sentence' from the CW. The main character was ALREADY MARRIED to a brother and still ended up in a love triangle.
 
Is it fair to say even though Parker may be prettier in the face, Sophie has more sex appeal? Parker doesn't really know how to be sexy because of her awkwardness, but Sophie oozess sexyness all the time.

I get exactly what you mean. But I'd still choose Parker, assuming there's any real likelihood of having a normal-enough relationship.

For fun, here's a quote from when they started to get together....
  • This exchange from the end of "The Long Way Down Job":

Parker: You realize this isn't going to be normal.

Hardison: My nana says that normal is whatever works for you. This, we all work.

Parker: I should meet your nana.

Hardison: Yeah... wait, what?


Well that's because that's what they are going for with the Sophie character. Not to mention she has exotic features and an accent that are considered sexy among alot of men... and women(lol).

Parker is the funny cute girl which is why she has more cute and comic relief scenes and lines than Sophie. But they gave Parker some sexy moments as well.

Watching the 3rd episode of season 4 of "Leverage" & my opinion of Parker vs. Sophie holds up in 1 particular scene. There's a op scene in a bar where Parker hits on the dude who's the target in this episode & gives him her number. Parker just comes off as goofy compared to whenever Sophie does ops like this. LOL she struggles to be sexy.
 
Watching the 3rd episode of season 4 of "Leverage" & my opinion of Parker vs. Sophie holds up in 1 particular scene. There's a op scene in a bar where Parker hits on the dude who's the target in this episode & gives him her number. Parker just comes off as goofy compared to whenever Sophie does ops like this. LOL she struggles to be sexy.

Starts around 15:38
 
@qaz1 You jumping in on "The Republic of Sarah" too?

I may have to give it a shot. If I hear the second episode is good, I'll jump in before I get too far behind.

4 seasons seems to much only to wait for a fictional relationship lol. I was thinking something like 2 seasons, the first one being the "working progress" to be a future couple. This TRoS is a new TV show, first they need get a loyal fan base to get a season 2 or they can be another cancelled show and since this is CW i'm expecting the usual "on and off relationship" season after season only to bring more drama. I hate the "on and off" shit lol


Nah I'm saying they get half a season TOPS lol! I get wanting to "see how they began" and all, but I much prefer seeing them in the actual relationship. If the writers have to fall back on these tired cliches, they're bad writers.

LOL, looks like actor that plays Grover ain't in a hurry for Sarah & Grover to get together:



That ain't gonna make @qaz1 happy.
 
Just watched this week's episode of "The Flash" (Season 7, Episode 11). During the 3rd-to-last scene of the episode, looks like they they might've teased a IR love interest for the brotha Chester, who was introduced last season & promoted to the regular cast this season, that works at STAR Labs. LOL the problem for me is, even though I keep up with "The Flash" week-to-week, I've only been been half-paying attention when watching the episodes these last couple of seasons. So I have no idea what the name of this chick is or what's her backstory without looking it up. She's part of the regular cast & was also introduced on the show last season. I think she works at the Police Department with Barry & Joe OR maybe she works at that media outlet with Iris, I'm not sure. But she is also part of Team Flash.


EDIT:


YFyRzq8.png


1DIL96Q.png


UR2tUce.png


k1GcB5W.png


cSAHvX7.png


A62o63f.png


eNXEQto.png


dEKrYt7.png

I don't watch regularily anymore but she is the live action version Alexa (I forgot her last name) aka Fuerza. Introduced in DC I think back in 2012.
flash_10.png
latest


She's the host of the strength force and changes whenever she get angry and has no control over(Fuerza). Sound familiar? lol.

Wrong character. You're confusing & mixing up 2 different characters. The chick I was talking about & is in those screenshots I posted her name according to Wikipedia & IMDB is Allegra Garica and she's played by Kayla Compton. The Alexa/Fuerza chick you mentioned is played by Sara Garcia.

My fault. I have not seen that episode of the screencaps you posted and immediately thought it was her. That's also the first time I seen her and Chester together like the way you think. Were they flirting in that episode?


I haven't watched this week's episode of "The Flash" (Season 7, Episode 14) yet, but looks like Chester & Allegra had a scene together:


 
LOL, looks like actor that plays Grover ain't in a hurry for Sarah & Grover to get together:



That ain't gonna make @qaz1 happy.
Slow burns have become just as annoying as love triangles.

He did say HE's not in a rush. He could've been just speaking for himself. I think part of the reason why they go with these slowburns is because they be betting on these shows lasting a long time. I would love to see IR(bm/ww) couples that are already together but then again they just might break them up like they did with Nick and Nancy. lol.
 
He did say HE's not in a rush. He could've been just speaking for himself. I think part of the reason why they go with these slowburns is because they be betting on these shows lasting a long time. I would love to see IR(bm/ww) couples that are already together but then again they just might break them up like they did with Nick and Nancy. lol.
It's kind of a double edged sword lol But I would rather they get together than already be together when the show starts. If they're already together that makes them vulnerable to an early break up. I have no problem with the flirting and attraction stage, I can even deal with a whole season of it but damn sure not 3 or 4 seasons of it. Now obviously this only applies when black males are involved because white dudes have the luxury of not having to worry about it.
 
Trailer for the 2nd season of "Evil" dropped tonight:




Looks like the show is being moved to Paramount+. Makes sense because "Evil" isn't a show that stereotypically fits in with CBS' lineup.
The ratings were pretty good though. They must don't like a variety.

More promotional video clips for the new season 2 of "Evil":


Is the end only the beginning? Creators Robert and Michelle King-as well as stars Katja Herbers, Mike Colter, Aasif Mandvi, and Michael Emerson-elaborate on the Season 1 finale (Episode 13, "Book 27") and what may lie ahead in Season 2.


The new season of Evil premieres June 20, exclusively on Paramount+. The second season brings evil closer to home. Kristen struggles with her darker nature, while David suffers temptation as he gets closer to his ordination. Meanwhile Ben is visited by night terrors that prey on his greatest fears.


A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Get a sneak peak of what's coming this season on Evil, now streaming exclusively on Paramount+.

Looks like they added BTS featurettes for all of season 1 on the Paramount Plus YouTube channel in the last week or so.
 
Cecily Strong and Keegan-Michael Key in Schmigadoon


In Schmigadoon, the comedy all-stars are an on-the-rocks couple stuck in a zany village out of a classic Hollywood musical.

The six-episode series will begin on July 16th with two episodes, followed by one new episode every Friday thereafter.


 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom