Yes, as a child living in another country/culture (Thailand) where dog meat is common, Obama admittJed to eating dog. This has nothing to do with Trump taking steps to willfully remove protection and transparency when it comes to the protection of our pets, something Obama never did to my knowledge, for no other reason than for profit. As a pet owner (caretaker) this issue is very important and awareness needs to be raised, not a time for partisan mud slinging.
It was not Thailand, but Indonesia and it is NOT "common" in Indonesia as Muslims consider dogmeat to be 'unclean'. I don't know if his Muslim step-father fed it to him because he didn't elaborate how he consumed it. He did however joke about it at the WH Correspondents Dinner. How nice.
In reference to mudslinging - Olbermann is your main man there. Because he tried to tie this to Trump and pet ownership and ignored dog eating.
Rather than just stick to the facts, he told half a story.
Seems this crap decision didn't just appear overnight..
USDA Says Removal of Animal Welfare Records Not Final
- By MARY CLARE JALONICK, ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON — Feb 7, 2017
The Agriculture Department says "adjustments may be made" in its decision to remove animal welfare inspection reports, enforcement records and other information about the treatment of animals from its website.
The information, including lists of animal welfare violations at commercial dog and horse breeding facilities and animal testing labs, was removed from the department's website Friday morning.
A spokeswoman for USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service said Tuesday..."These decisions are not final," said USDA's Tanya Espinosa in a statement. "Adjustments may be made regarding information appropriate for release and posting."
..."APHIS is currently involved in litigation concerning, among other issues, information posted on the agency's website," Espinosa said. "While the agency is vigorously defending against this litigation, in an abundance of caution, the agency is taking additional measures to protect individual privacy."
Espinosa said a review of the website has been
ongoing and the agency decided to "make adjustments to the posting of regulatory records" in 2016, before President Donald Trump took office. But former President Barack Obama's agriculture secretary,
Tom Vilsack, appeared not to act on that decision.
On Sunday, a former USDA spokesman for Vilsack said on Twitter that the decision to remove the reports was "not required."
"Same option given 2 past admin. We refused. #transparency," tweeted Matthew Herrick.
At issue is a long-running dispute between animal rights groups and some animal industry groups, including the horse industry, over documents related to the Animal Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act. Some in the industry have sued the department to have the records removed from the website, citing personal information."
...The Humane Society of the United States says it has taken steps to reopen a settled lawsuit against USDA. The two parties settled a lawsuit in
2009 that required some of the information to be posted.
******
So the fight for full disclosure has been ongoing for years. This is not new but the. blame-mudslinging is.
To add to the USDA garbage and what Corporations have tried to pull over the last few years, is now this man..
One of the top advisers to USDA from the Trump administration has been Brian Klippenstein, who comes from an animal agriculture group called Protect the Harvest. One of that group's missions is to "inform America's consumers, businesses and decision-makers about the threats posed by animal rights groups and anti-farming extremists."
Ugh!.