Thank you for not taking the time to read any of the links I've sent you, kiddo. And allow me to refute your shitty claims:
1.
Proof positive that you're basically proving that it's a social construct. Not only you've defeated your own claim by using the "some people believe" and others believe argument, you never specified any well known scientist who believe that today and understands it altogether. And I'll repeat myself since you have an attention span of gnat:
"Whatever physical differences we have, are VERY minuscule since our DNA across the human spectrum is 99.85% similar to one another. Our phenotype (outward appearances) aren't universal in any way shape or form."
Now, I'll quote from a link I've provided since you're too lazy to do that:
Do you see where I'm going with this? In short: Race was constructed to reinforce some form of superiority complex for some people. And further to distinguish between groups. But you're too damn stupid and naive to think otherwise. I'm still waiting for what exactly makes us all that different from a universal standpoint? You can't. Know why? You're a product of that busted old world mindset. The only reality within the concept of race is how we use it from a sociological standpoint.
2. The skeletal findings are based on anthropological (or people within certain regions) findings, which is clearly not the same as biological. Again, they are using sociological constructs to distinguish different people based on bone structure or foundation. That's hardly showing that there's a difference between races. Finding bones within certain regions is irrelevant in this case.