Islam and the Muslim

desreveRsIgnitirW said:
Jewish people STILL aren't a race...

It would make Uganda an Aids prone society but Christianity has NOTHING to do with them getting aids.

In fact,strict practices of Christianity would probably deter them from engaging in behavior that leads to contracting HIV.

You're gonna need a better analogy than that boo. We'll blame that one on the fact English isn't your first language.
Click to expand...
Jews are a race.

You don't hear people say "I have some catholic blood" or "he has a baptist nose"

But you do hear people say "I have some jewish blood" and "he has a jewish nose"

Jews are more of a race than they care to admit.
 
Most Jewish people worldwide are Ashkenazi. In 1931 they comprised more than 90% of the global Jewish population.

Ashkenazis are all converts too. They're Europeans who converted a while back and were what white people call "clannish". They separated themselves to the point where whites didn't look at them as being the same and Jews didn't look at themselves as being like "gentiles".

They're Europeans though,make no mistake about it,they are WHITE. Only 3 races exist in the world,African,Caucasoid and Mongoloid. Some people argue Australian aborigines are a seperate race too but that's a seperate topic. Jewish people also did some mixing with other semites so they'll look different from SOME kinds of white people.

Pick a Jewish guy in your mind,any Jewish guy and pick a white guy who's not Jewish. Put them side by side in your brain and ask yourself,"are these 2 men racially different from eachother?". Chances are who ever that Jewish guy you picked was,if you didn't already know he was Jewish,you would have called him white.
 
desreveRsIgnitirW said:
Most Jewish people worldwide are Ashkenazi. In 1931 they comprised more than 90% of the global Jewish population.

Ashkenazis are all converts too. They're Europeans who converted a while back and were what white people call "clannish". They separated themselves to the point where whites didn't look at them as being the same and Jews didn't look at themselves as being like "gentiles".

They're Europeans though,make no mistake about it,they are WHITE. Only 3 races exist in the world,African,Caucasoid and Mongoloid. Some people argue Australian aborigines are a seperate race too but that's a seperate topic. Jewish people also did some mixing with other semites so they'll look different from SOME kinds of white people.

Pick a Jewish guy in your mind,any Jewish guy and pick a white guy who's not Jewish. Put them side by side in your brain and ask yourself,"are these 2 men racially different from eachother?". Chances are who ever that Jewish guy you picked was,if you didn't already know he was Jewish,you would have called him white.
Click to expand...

to me there are no races.. i don't look at people that way.. we are all human..
 
desreveRsIgnitirW said:
Anybody that says that is full of...
Click to expand...

Well-thought out understanding that race is merely a social construct. Just because our extended phenotype differs, our genetic differences are only minuscule. And secondly, as a HUMAN RACE, everyone is capable of breeding regarding of our physical features. If we were truly separate races, then there would be a pre-zygotic barrier to where the sperm would die out the minute it enters the bloodstream of a woman. This isn't cross-breeding. It's merely integration of the human race.

Proof #1

Proof #2

Proof #3

All those links can disprove the claim that we're of different "races" and to deny that would deny us as being part of the same race of people: Human. You're more than welcomed to deny the proofs here, but that's only because you ALLOW sociological norms of defining oneself to best you.
 
sockervaddghosts.jpg


You said you could never get with a white guy and you're on BLACKMENwhitewomen.com...

Clearly you saw enough of a difference between white guys and black guys to PREJUDGE which one you'd prefer,since you've never been with a white guy.

Even though you've never tested to see if a white guy looks like a ghost in the dark,you PREJUDGED him and his appearance...

Now does this look to you like someone who's completely blind to the concept of race? I'm sure the post you made about white guys was just a joke though, so we'll leave it at that.

#ImAWarlock

warlock.jpg
 
BigBrotherWise said:
Well-thought out understanding that race is merely a social construct. Just because our extended phenotype differs, our genetic differences are only minuscule. And secondly, as a HUMAN RACE, everyone is capable of breeding regarding of our physical features. If we were truly separate races, then there would be a pre-zygotic barrier to where the sperm would die out the minute it enters the bloodstream of a woman. This isn't cross-breeding. It's merely integration of the human race.

Proof #1

Proof #2

Proof #3

All those links can disprove the claim that we're of different "races" and to deny that would deny us as being part of the same race of people: Human. You're more than welcomed to deny the proofs here, but that's only because you ALLOW sociological norms of defining oneself to best you.
Click to expand...


I think ur talking bout species now.. still I don't like this race thingy, I thought we were more civilized than that
 
BigBrotherWise said:
Well-thought out understanding that race is merely a social construct. Just because our extended phenotype differs, our genetic differences are only minuscule. And secondly, as a HUMAN RACE, everyone is capable of breeding regarding of our physical features. If we were truly separate races, then there would be a pre-zygotic barrier to where the sperm would die out the minute it enters the bloodstream of a woman. This isn't cross-breeding. It's merely integration of the human race.

Proof #1

Proof #2

Proof #3

All those links can disprove the claim that we're of different "races" and to deny that would deny us as being part of the same race of people: Human. You're more than welcomed to deny the proofs here, but that's only because you ALLOW sociological norms of defining oneself to best you.
Click to expand...

This is no proof and there's more differences between us than phenotypic ones. You've read it but clearly dont understand it.

Leave the science up to scientists and you stick with the dick drawings.
 
desreveRsIgnitirW said:
sockervaddghosts.jpg


You said you could never get with a white guy and you're on BLACKMENwhitewomen.com...

Clearly you saw enough of a difference between white guys and black guys to PREJUDGE which one you'd prefer,since you've never been with a white guy.

Even though you've never tested to see if a white guy looks like a ghost in the dark,you PREJUDGED him and his appearance...

Now does this look to you like someone who's completely blind to the concept of race? I'm sure the post you made about white guys was just a joke though, so we'll leave it at that.

#ImAWarlock

warlock.jpg
Click to expand...

Well I have seen a lot of white guys in the dark, as friends thoo.. haha and I actually woke up and got scared one time.. haha it was my best friend and I was like u gotta turn on the light cus u look like a ghost, haha he totally bitch slapped me tho

and I love many white dudes as friends, but I haven't felt attraction to any YET.. that's why Im on here.. Im not saying they are evil or anything, just visually it doesn't do it for me
 
sockervadd said:
I think ur talking bout species now.. still I don't like this race thingy, I thought we were more civilized than that
Click to expand...

One thing scientists have uncovered is that human brain have six different dimensions and one area of the brain focuses on judgment. That's the key thing. What people see that is foreign to them, they react out of fear and in order to reinforce some area of superiority within themselves, they judge others based on what can be seen clearly different. In this case, the epidermis and some minute genetic differences within the human race.

And also, I'm speaking on species, but also the misconceptions on the concept of race - proving you right that it doesn't exist. It's strictly social and have been since man had the capability to rationalize and think.
 
sockervadd said:
Well I have seen a lot of white guys in the dark, as friends thoo.. haha and I actually woke up and got scared one time.. haha it was my best friend and I was like u gotta turn on the light cus u look like a ghost, haha he totally bitch slapped me tho

and I love many white dudes as friends, but I haven't felt attraction to any YET.. that's why Im on here.. Im not saying they are evil or anything, just visually it doesn't do it for me
Click to expand...

My point is that if we're all the same,why did you see enough of a difference in one group to know you liked it over another?

But sweetheart you have a blessed day,I wish u the best of luck.
 
desreveRsIgnitirW said:
This is no proof and there's more differences between us than phenotypic ones. You've read it but clearly dont understand it.

Leave the science up to scientists and you stick with the dick drawings.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see the differences. What EXCLUSIVE differences do we have, as a group from a UNIVERSAL standpoint in which no other group can possess? I 'm much more well-versed in science and anthropology given by your pissant responses. All the major scientists, including ones who studied evolutionary biology would agree that "race is a social construct". It's YOU who lack the fundamental knowledge regarding race.

And instead of just looking at the words in blue with a line under it, why not look at the damn links and comprehend the information and refute whatever it is you think is inaccurate. I've given my sources, where are yours outside of the eugenics nonsense displayed by broken ideas from the past?

Having a hard time reading the links? READ THIS!
 
BigBrotherWise said:
I'd like to see the differences. What EXCLUSIVE differences do we have, as a group from a UNIVERSAL standpoint in which no other group can possess? I 'm much more well-versed in science and anthropology given by your pissant responses. All the major scientists, including ones who studied evolutionary biology would agree that "race is a social construct". It's YOU who lack the fundamental knowledge regarding race.

And instead of just looking at the words in blue with a line under it, why not look at the damn links and comprehend the information and refute whatever it is you think is inaccurate. I've given my sources, where are yours outside of the eugenics nonsense displayed by broken ideas from the past?

Having a hard time reading the links? READ THIS!
Click to expand...

You're obviously not since you don't understand what you're reading,you're a Google search scholar.

Also,there is no one definition for race. Some say race can exist on a biological level which there are enough difference between a black person,an asian person or a white person to observe, or simply the differences on a physical level such as outward appearance.

You said you're "well versed" in anthropology,so how come you dont know that skeletal remains can tell whether someone is to be classified and Negroid,Mongoloid or caucasoid? If "all scientists agree" on no race, then why do they distinguish skeletal remains?

Being there's no one definition for race because it depends on one's opinion on what race is,it'll always be disputed. What your links are saying is that basically there's enough things in between blacks and whites today that we can link them ex: biracials. It's saying they're not COMPLETELY separated.

You're reading but not understanding,prolly cuz u too busy doin dis

QuirkyImage-SquirtBurt.jpg
 
Thank you for not taking the time to read any of the links I've sent you, kiddo. And allow me to refute your shitty claims:

1.
Also,there is no one definition for race. Some say race can exist on a biological level which there are enough difference between a black person,an asian person or a white person to observe, or simply the differences on a physical level such as outward appearance.
Click to expand...

Proof positive that you're basically proving that it's a social construct. Not only you've defeated your own claim by using the "some people believe" and others believe argument, you never specified any well known scientist who believe that today and understands it altogether. And I'll repeat myself since you have an attention span of gnat:

"Whatever physical differences we have, are VERY minuscule since our DNA across the human spectrum is 99.85% similar to one another. Our phenotype (outward appearances) aren't universal in any way shape or form."

Now, I'll quote from a link I've provided since you're too lazy to do that:

The notion of race as a social construct I am proposing is partially captured by various works. In Takaki’s work A Different Mirror: A history of Multicultural America, race is a social construct produced by the dominant group in society and their power to define. In other words, the dominant group in society imposed the boundaries of group membership by defining race in terms of biology. If you were black, then you were biologically inferior to a white person. Takaki explains that Africans in America were first brought to America as indentured servants. After completing the terms of their servitude they were freed, and had the status of free men. The color line at the time had not been drawn. Nonetheless, with the growing population of free Africans in America, fear of losing hegemonic control began to spread through the white population. Due to this, race as a biological concept was developed and used to justify the enslavement of a growing free black population early in U.S. history. This initial biological understanding of race helped draw the color line. The boundaries of group membership were marked by skin color. Till this day the primary race indicator is skin color.
Click to expand...

Do you see where I'm going with this? In short: Race was constructed to reinforce some form of superiority complex for some people. And further to distinguish between groups. But you're too damn stupid and naive to think otherwise. I'm still waiting for what exactly makes us all that different from a universal standpoint? You can't. Know why? You're a product of that busted old world mindset. The only reality within the concept of race is how we use it from a sociological standpoint.

2. The skeletal findings are based on anthropological (or people within certain regions) findings, which is clearly not the same as biological. Again, they are using sociological constructs to distinguish different people based on bone structure or foundation. That's hardly showing that there's a difference between races. Finding bones within certain regions is irrelevant in this case.

desreveRsIgnitirW said:
You're obviously not since you don't understand what you're reading,you're a Google search scholar.

Also,there is no one definition for race. Some say race can exist on a biological level which there are enough difference between a black person,an asian person or a white person to observe, or simply the differences on a physical level such as outward appearance.

You said you're "well versed" in anthropology,so how come you dont know that skeletal remains can tell whether someone is to be classified and Negroid,Mongoloid or caucasoid? If "all scientists agree" on no race, then why do they distinguish skeletal remains?

Being there's no one definition for race because it depends on one's opinion on what race is,it'll always be disputed. What your links are saying is that basically there's enough things in between blacks and whites today that we can link them ex: biracials. It's saying they're not COMPLETELY separated.

You're reading but not understanding,prolly cuz u too busy doin dis
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom