Eddie Murphy and Paige Butcher

http://www.tmz.com/2018/09/14/eddie-murphy-paige-butcher-pregnant-having-a-boy/
IT'S A BOY!

In a surprising move Paige revealed to paparrazi the sex of the baby and was quite casual and comfortable with saying it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/t...tcher-flaunts-growing-baby-bump-shopping.html
503A544100000578-6172253-image-m-56_1537051171535.jpg

502E1A3600000578-0-image-a-4_1536959091496.jpg
 
I always hate that argument. Both parties want physical attraction so saying he wouldn't want her if she weren't gorgeous is like saying he wouldn't want her unless she's breathing. People want to be physically attracted to who they're with.

Of course you do.
 
Maybe they think they will tap into the next Kardasian syndrome?
Interesting thought. I don't particularly try to understand women's behavior, just elaborating on what my take is, but this sounds plausible.

Nope. From my POV I'd still fuck Sharon Stone years past her prime just to say I bagged Sharon Stone. But that's from a thirsty male perspective
I can see a lot of dudes following suit. I'll pass tho. Anyway last time I checked Demi Moore can still get it.
 
I agree if we are just talking sex. If we talking LT, I don't think fame is something high on a woman's list, if it's even there at all.

I'd disagree. There are definitely those women who are all about the fame and wanting to be associated with it. There are a lot of people out there who are all about the illusion rather than the substance.
 
I think women, in general, like to think that we don't place a premium on anything that superficial. But we all know that's bullshit. Maybe it's not looks, but then it's power, or fame, or money, or status.
That's even more superficial than putting a premium on looks imo. At least looks is an inherent characteristic of a person. Those other things are social constructs.
 
That's even more superficial than putting a premium on looks imo. At least looks is an inherent characteristic of a person. Those other things are social constructs.

Ok, and the argument would be that those other things are things that are earned via talent, hard work, etc and therefore somehow more noble.
 
Ok, and the argument would be that those other things are things that are earned via talent, hard work, etc and therefore somehow more noble.
Well.......why can't a person earn that for themselves Instead of obtaining it through a mate?
 
You're thinking like a dude. Fame is public acceptance women love public validation. You don't remember popular dudes from high school who didn't have much but were popular for some reason and got a lot of women? Same principle
#Truth
 
Women don't?

I think women, in general, like to think that we don't place a premium on anything that superficial. But we all know that's bullshit. Maybe it's not looks, but then it's power, or fame, or money, or status.

Well, if a woman is together with someone who have eight children with 4 women, at least he should have money...
 
Back
Top Bottom