Chik fil-a...freedom of speech or intolerance?

Joan of Arc was a devote person. Nothing to say about that.

Demonic possessions never existed. Not even stigmata. It took a devout, Irish Catholic, who is one of the progenitors of modern psychology who debunked the idea of people being possessed by demons. All purely psychological.

Again, humans and their love for mysticism and love to keep things unknown tend to be a laughable ordeal.

I wouldn't say there is no evidence. Fatima? Demonic Possessions? Stigmata? Joan of Arc?
 
Ahhhh! Now I remember that. But I posted "Kris". So I could very well be

Kristopher
Kristophe
Kristian

Any of those variations. But noooo...you decided to refer to me by my real name. Again, I never used my real name, only a shorthand.

You started the thread, you posted the picture of yourself and YOU posted your name.
 
Ahhhh! Now I remember that. But I posted "Kris". So I could very well be

Kristopher
Kristophe
Kristian

Any of those variations. But noooo...you decided to refer to me by my real name. Again, I never used my real name, only a shorthand.

To take a page from Wunword's book:

Technicalities.
 
I didn't quote it bc I'm lazy (and sick again) but I think it was bookie said that CFA isn't a person who votes, only the owner is.

I think that all changed when then the sc upheld some kind of businesses are people nonsense.

Yes there are more important things to deal with, but when you look at how elections are bought and sold, none of it will be changed.

Super-pacs are giving the electoral voting power to the ppl in government who believe along the same lines as Cathy. And the big money holders are going to the GOP.

Because many here are not gay, you all think it won't effect you.

Mark my words though. Should theys types of people with these types of "values" become overly powerful in legislature..the civil rights/equal rights "laws" will all be in danger of being rewritten/undone.

All I said was Chik-fil-A wasn't a member of Congress.

As for your big money holders going to the GOP, that's not entirely true. Obama has raised how many hundreds of millions of dollars? In fact, aren't Obama and Romney pretty equal in their fundraising? That stats may have changed, I don't know.

Joan of Arc was a devote person. Nothing to say about that.

Demonic possessions never existed. Not even stigmata. It took a devout, Irish Catholic, who is one of the progenitors of modern psychology who debunked the idea of people being possessed by demons. All purely psychological.

Again, humans and their love for mysticism and love to keep things unknown tend to be a laughable ordeal.

Link please....

I'm not so sure that Joan of Arc was just "devout".

I've actually experienced ghosts, which would prove that there is something after death.

I'm not a very religious person, I don't attend church hardly ever, but I do believe there is something up there that we can't explain down here.
 
What you've experienced was purely psychological with neurological tendencies. Parascience is a form of psuedoscience. There's no proof whatsoever that ghosts exists. You don't have to be religious to believe in ghosts, but your mindset has to delve deep into the recess of your fears and fascinations into the unknown for it to trigger those events.

I live in a state where the idea of ghosts tend to sell people, but I never experienced any of that stuff. It's fear running down people's spine.

Link please....

I'm not so sure that Joan of Arc was just "devout".

I've actually experienced ghosts, which would prove that there is something after death.

I'm not a very religious person, I don't attend church hardly ever, but I do believe there is something up there that we can't explain down here.
 
What you've experienced was purely psychological with neurological tendencies. Parascience is a form of psuedoscience. There's no proof whatsoever that ghosts exists. You don't have to be religious to believe in ghosts, but your mindset has to delve deep into the recess of your fears and fascinations into the unknown for it to trigger those events.

I live in a state where the idea of ghosts tend to sell people, but I never experienced any of that stuff. It's fear running down people's spine.

No. What I experienced really happened. I can also tell you that when my daughter was a very, very small child (2 years and younger), she saw things and told me.

You can't explain away with science (and I'm a FIRM believer in science) the stuff that I experienced.
 
Pontiff= Head of the Roman Catholic Church Pontificate= being an arrogant motherfucker who thinks he/she is the repository of all knowledge and tries to lecture others every damn time. I believe one was derived from the other and it describes the Catholic Church perfectly. Christians are very judgemental and think their belief is superior to others making them better than others who practice Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and the like. The biggest culprits are the Catholics and the Evangelicals who like sitting on their moral high horse and wagging their judgemental finger in your face, yet are quick to tell you not to judge when one of their pastors is embroiled in scandal. For those talking about sin in the bible, David was an adulterer and a murderer yet God says David is a man after His own heart, Moses was also a murderer cus he killed an Egyptian who was fighting his kinsman, Rahab was a prostitute yet she was given honourable mention in the Bible and is in the bloodline of Jesus, Mary Magdalene was also a woman of questionable morals yet was close to Jesus, Jesus went to dine with Zacchaeus who was a crooked taxman. Who is anybody to judge somebody? The history of the Catholic Church is littered with blood and their pastors sexual history is splashed all over the news. Evangelical pastors have had their fair share of scandal as well. So for those who are waving the bible card on this gay issue i say look in the mirror.
 
Back
Top Bottom