Newspaper Publishes Gun Owners' Names and Addresses

Bliss said:
Freedom has never been possible without firearms. Disarm this country of any armed protection and see how freedom reigns. Not.

And that newspaper getting death threats? Who says it's by gun owners? It was anti-gunners who called for the deaths of the heads of the NRA. So it's plausible to me that the people threatening the paper might be those who have also been exposed to criminals as not owing a gun. You think anti-gun people are incapable of murder just because they don't like guns? LOL, please.

BTW, guess who is protecting the paper from possible harm from loons threatening them...
Yes, armed guards. Oh the irony.
Click to expand...

yeah but they were so law abiding huh? you wonder why people want gun control.....mofos witrh guns dont have control over themselves. look at zimmerman. he got his gun legally
 
The Dark King said:
Its one thing to publish the amount of gun owners out there but publishing names and addresses is persecution. It's singling out plain and simple.
We don't do that shit for drunk drivers and people who break the speed limit and they are responsible for ten times the amount of deaths per year.

All your provisions for gun control are reasonable and mostly already done but the tax thing is stupid. People will just buy black market bullets since the actual cost of making bullets hasn't gone up. Its incredibly cheap and people will make money off of that.
All your gun provisions fall under not wanting people to have assault rifles which to me is fine or if they are allowed to have them they should have to jump through more hoops to get them like the difference between a regular drivers license and a CDL. Even though I don't see how they can really enforce it though
Click to expand...


They are asking law abiding business people, why do they need AR-15's or any clips with more than a 10 round capacity. (which is even more silly because what is wrong with a handgun having more than 10 rounds?) Soon as a criminal gets away in a Nissan GTR, they are going to say: why do you need a car that goes 200 mph when the speed limit is 55? Forgetting that the criminal probably stole the one he used. Why do you need more than 500 hp? The rationale is the same.
 
goodlove said:
yeah but they were so law abiding huh? you wonder why people want gun control.....mofos witrh guns dont have control over themselves. look at zimmerman. he got his gun legally
Click to expand...

I own a gun and have never harmed a sole. Im not the exception Im the rule sir
 
Bliss said:
Freedom has never been possible without firearms. Disarm this country of any armed protection and see how freedom reigns. Not.

And that newspaper getting death threats? Who says it's by gun owners? It was anti-gunners who called for the deaths of the heads of the NRA. So it's plausible to me that the people threatening the paper might be those who have also been exposed to criminals as not owing a gun. You think anti-gun people are incapable of murder just because they don't like guns? LOL, please.

BTW, guess who is protecting the paper from possible harm from loons threatening them...
Yes, armed guards. Oh the irony.
Click to expand...

:smt081
 
We need to go back to revolvers.
Just to show how maniacal it is for gun enthusiasts to insist they NEED a firearm with more than a 6-10 round capacity.

Revolver_32acp_ruby.jpg



Keep it old skool.:smt067

High capacity mags are for the military or the movies.:roll:

Someone remind Bliss that the Civil Rights movement led by MLK never fired ONE bullet to get the Voting Rights Act signed into law, or to integrate schools down South.

Women didn't get the right to vote because they owned guns.

We live in a democratic country, not a Soviet style socialist dictatorship.
The power of the people is in the voting booths, not at the end of a gun barrel.

If bullets and guns are more powerful than votes, there is no America anymore.
 
The Dark King said:
I own a gun and have never harmed a sole. Im not the exception Im the rule sir
Click to expand...

yeah, wow, good come back. lets do this ....lets make drunk driving legal because there are people who never drink and drive.

paniro187 said:
And that is the slippery slope people speak of. What? Why can't they have cameras on the street I am doing nothing wrong so its OK. Next thing you know they have a camera up in your home watching you.
Click to expand...

so does your "right" to own a gun supercedes someones right to live....

dumbasses shoot their guns in the air on the fourth of july and new years and don t think those bullets come back down. a kid died on new years at church from a bullet coming thru the roof because of that...was the shooter law biding......we dont know they were never cuaght.


also how many people died from cameras on the traffic lites versus a gun.....
 
Beasty said:
The right to reduce the value of investments owned by others, by means other than competition? You may as well spray paint the neighbors house. Not happening
Click to expand...

how does growing your own food reduce property values? the first lady even has a veggie garden on the white house grounds:)
 
andreboba said:
THis isn't true. Check your sources.
Click to expand...

It is true. Only handguns were found in the building. Unless Lanza did the crime, ran outside, locked the rifle in the cars trunk then ran back inside and shot himself.

Ar was not used.




[YOUTUBE]IqpjJ6P-NSQ [/YOUTUBE]
 
shaft2k4 said:
It is true. Only handguns were found in the building. Unless Lanza did the crime, ran outside, locked the rifle in the cars trunk then ran back inside and shot himself.

Ar was not used.




[youtube]IqpjJ6P-NSQ [/youtube]
Click to expand...


Again, check your sources. Lanza left a shotgun in his car, not his AR15.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-lanza-guns/index.html


The primary weapon used in the attack was a "Bushmaster AR-15 assault-type weapon," said Connecticut State Police Lt. Paul Vance. The rifle is a Bushmaster version of a widely made AR-15, the civilian version of the M-16 rifle used by the U.S. military. The original M-16 patent ran out years ago, and now the AR-15 is manufactured by several gunmakers. Unlike the military version, the AR-15 is a semiautomatic, firing one bullet per squeeze of the trigger. But like the M-16, ammunition is loaded through a magazine. In the school shooting, police say Lanza's rifle used numerous 30-round magazines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom