I have talked about three different women within the last 24 hours alone on here that I think are sexy. Stalk closer.
LOL. You're missing my point. If the only positive thing you ever have to say about a woman is that they are sexy, then that's not really positive, is it? And, so not stalking. Grow some tits if you want me to stalk you. True, I still won't stalk you, but I might check out your tits.
you are just offensive period...everything you say is negative...i'm so glad that you think i am cute and clever...unfortunately you have now been added to my ignore list for boring me...the good news is that you will be there with all of your friends...misery loves company...enjoy!:smt039
LOL -how is being sexy not a postive trait for a woman? Oh yeah I forgot you were bi-sexual. Leaning a little closer to the female side of the fence this week? What do you specifically prefer I say postive on here? LMAO. I talk positive about my gf all of the time.
I actually do think you're reasonably cute for an older lady, I was being sarcastic about the clever part. I am truely hurt you put me on your ignore list although I know you probably didn't.
LOL. CBQ, you're new and you're already on my list of posters whose every post I read in its entirety.:smt052
Fair enough. I'll let you know if I grow a pair of tits by the weekend if you are not back on dick by then.
The fact that I've got you repeating my suggestion that you grow tits tells me that my work here is done. And done well, I might add.
I've had the same man for 17 years. I don't need another. I've never flirted with any man here, and I won't ever, so get it out of your head.
Yeah and i even edited my post for further clearity. Let me tell you, job well done indeed. You totally got me.
LMAO @ you thinking I was attempting to flirt with you. 17 years? Im in my early twenties I only like fresh milk.
I've read that you were a former WN, but you appear to have the opinions of someone that still is a WN. What that other poster wrote had absolutely nothing to do with black people being oppressed or victimized. I'm not upset, but I do believe that your comment was unnecessary. His comment didn't reinforce anything. Those stereotypes were created by groups of radicals that have an intense hatred for black people. They could care less if a bm takes responsibility for his actions or not. They're not concerned if there are bm in this world that are kind or courteous. I've researched WN's in the past, and based upon my studies, I've learned that the leaders of WN organizations hope to establish an all-white nation within the US and other nations that are mostly white. The plan is to go to war with other races and force people of color to reside in their "nation of origin". They can't accomplish their goals if most white people don't have beliefs similar to their own. Basically, the whole point of the stereotypes is to promote fear and anger within the white community by demonizing black people in general. The information and statistics that they provide are usually created out of thin air and aren't factually based. I'm sure you're well aware of this, but I feel it's good that some posters here know the truth.
Maybe you should have said that in the first place, I understood you tried to explain the reasons behind that man's behaviour but it was innapropriate, sounded almost like you've tried to excuse it, although you didn't meant it that way. Some others and Athena herself were under the same impression, so it wasn't just me. This has nothing to do with my views. His comment on Athena's story was unecessary, it had nothing to do with the topic and with the point he's trying to prove, that BM have low standards, and it also hurt Athena, she was made to feel bad about the whole story like it was her fault, so I felt someone had to stand by her on this, actually she thanked me for posting:
No, I definitely understand why you defended Athena, but you didn't need bring up those specific stereotypes about black people just to prove that you're her ally.
First of all...everyone needs to quit with all the "I didn't say anything...I'm just keeping it real bullshit." If you can't argue about the matter at hand without resorting to backhanded shit...SHUT THE FUCK UP! And if you insist on pissing people off...again SHUT THE FUCK UP! If you folks are as intelligent as you all claim to be, you can make a point without offending specific people. Now, back to the lecture at hand... WW that really, really love BM will lower their standards to date a brotha...NOT ALL BUT SOME (which is the case for any group of people sometimes). He might have a nice body and some other good physical characteristics, but not much between the ears. That happens far more than we'd like to admit. WW that don't have a strong preference but are open to the idea will generally aim higher when dating the brothas. The term "standards" is so misleading because a man may say "I have high standards because I only date thin, attractive, large breasted WW." That is more about preference than "standard." The word implies that because you like something that is relatively rare or that is desired by more people, your "standards" are higher and therefore better which in turn makes you better. It only means you are more picky when it comes to the physical and being picky and having standards are NOT the same thing. If you have a natural preference for something (this is to males and females) that is fine. The problem is that too many Negroes and WW's on here believe that somehow their preferences make them better for some unexplainable reason. "I like [insert traits] therefore I rule and you suck donkey nuts." STUPID SHIT and it's kind of disappointing considering most of you are 2-10 years older than I am. Grow up and shut up. Worry less about who others lust after and focus on yourself. And stop all this "they make us look bad when they date X, Y and Z." Make us look bad to who exactly? Get off the plantation. The Civil War ended more than 140 years ago and Britain freed their slaves before that. Run to freedom y'all...it's only a few steps away!
