Elin Woods gets 750 Million

[The Dark King]

Andrae he referred to a post by Espy that clearly referred to child support. Child support is not alimony. Child support is a given alimony is not.

No sweetheart the part that you quoted was his reply to the division of assets and who has to pay out more and replied that its mostly men since we have more usually.

 

[JordanC]

No sweetheart the part that you quoted was his reply to the division of assets and who has to pay out more and replied that its mostly men since we have more usually.

When you get divorced there are usually three things to decide financially. Child support, alimony and assets. You seem to lump assets with alimony and keeping a lifestyle.

 

[JordanC]

He highlighted the info on child custody Andrae. Jordan is absolutely correct that child custody is tied to child support. I think her point was not only valid, but it actually made me realize something I hadn't consciously considered. The person with custody of the children has more responsibility, and will direct a large portion of their finances to supporting the children, therefore factoring that in over the number of years till the children are adults significantly increases what being divorced cost that person. Interesting, thanks Jordan!

Thank you.

 

[pettyofficerj]

like i said boys

marriage stinks

just look at the statistics




you wouldn't go to the store in a bad neighborhood at 1 in the morning, because of statistics, so why would you get married



they can take that 'put a ring on it' mantra and blow it all to hell

 

[LA]

they can take that 'put a ring on it' mantra and blow it all to hell

 

[pettyofficerj]

honestly, am i the only one who gets irked when that song comes on?

maybe i'm looking at it too literally



but when you got girls, actually quoting the song and saying 'you better put a ring on it, if you want it'

 

[Liquid Swords]

honestly, am i the only one who gets irked when that song comes on?

maybe i'm looking at it too literally



but when you got girls, actually quoting the song and saying 'you better put a ring on it, if you want it'

Only ring you'll need to put on for me is one of these bad boys...

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=3542


For real though I hate that song and the fact that like every girl at the club knows the whole dance except me, gives me time to get a couple tequilas at the bar though. I usually like Bey though. :smt003

 

[pettyofficerj]

Only ring you'll need to put on for me is one of these bad boys...

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=3542


For real though I hate that song and the fact that like every girl at the club knows the whole dance except me, gives me time to get a couple tequilas at the bar though. I usually like Bey though. :smt003

wait, you told me u only like rough riders

ur still a baby tho...once u get some age on u, ur going to be hustlin' brothas to get married

 

[LA]

 

[pettyofficerj]

lol










pass

 

[The Dark King]

He highlighted the info on child custody Andrae. Jordan is absolutely correct that child custody is tied to child support. I think her point was not only valid, but it actually made me realize something I hadn't consciously considered. The person with custody of the children has more responsibility, and will direct a large portion of their finances to supporting the children, therefore factoring that in over the number of years till the children are adults significantly increases what being divorced cost that person. Interesting, thanks Jordan!

Again I have to tap out and agree to disagree because this statement is absolutely ridiculous. You shouldn't be compensated for taking care of your kids. Child support is absolutely justified I even think the 18 % they ask for in Ny state is too little.but compensation because your court mandated to take care of your kids doesn't fly with me. You wanted custody so that means taking all the responsibilty that goes with that but once a marriage is over I shouldn't be responsible for a grown person. What if your spouse died? All insurance should be for the the kids not the grown person who btw is the kids parent too. Its ludacris but like I said I'm tapping out.

 

[chicity]

Again I have to tap out and agree to disagree because this statement is absolutely ridiculous. You shouldn't be compensated for taking care of your kids. Child support is absolutely justified I even think the 18 % they ask for in Ny state is too little.but compensation because your court mandated to take care of your kids doesn't fly with me. You wanted custody so that means taking all the responsibilty that goes with that but once a marriage is over I shouldn't be responsible for a grown person. What if your spouse died? All insurance should be for the the kids not the grown person who btw is the kids parent too. Its ludacris but like I said I'm tapping out.

Um, so you're opposed to your spouse getting any insurance money if you die?

That's a bit harsh. Unless I'm misunderstanding you, which is entirely possible cause I'm not sure your post follows hers. I don't think she was suggesting what you think she's suggesting.

 

[JordanC]

Again I have to tap out and agree to disagree because this statement is absolutely ridiculous. You shouldn't be compensated for taking care of your kids. Child support is absolutely justified I even think the 18 % they ask for in Ny state is too little.but compensation because your court mandated to take care of your kids doesn't fly with me. You wanted custody so that means taking all the responsibilty that goes with that but once a marriage is over I shouldn't be responsible for a grown person. What if your spouse died? All insurance should be for the the kids not the grown person who btw is the kids parent too. Its ludacris but like I said I'm tapping out.

Just cause you split after the divorce doesn't mean the kids don't need a house to live in and food to eat. It's for the kids not the other spouse. Andrae you get very passionate about this. Why?

 

[pettyofficerj]

Again I have to tap out and agree to disagree because this statement is absolutely ridiculous. You shouldn't be compensated for taking care of your kids. Child support is absolutely justified I even think the 18 % they ask for in Ny state is too little.but compensation because your court mandated to take care of your kids doesn't fly with me. You wanted custody so that means taking all the responsibilty that goes with that but once a marriage is over I shouldn't be responsible for a grown person. What if your spouse died? All insurance should be for the the kids not the grown person who btw is the kids parent too. Its ludacris but like I said I'm tapping out.

 

[Espy]

Again I have to tap out and agree to disagree because this statement is absolutely ridiculous. You shouldn't be compensated for taking care of your kids. Child support is absolutely justified I even think the 18 % they ask for in Ny state is too little.but compensation because your court mandated to take care of your kids doesn't fly with me. You wanted custody so that means taking all the responsibilty that goes with that but once a marriage is over I shouldn't be responsible for a grown person. What if your spouse died? All insurance should be for the the kids not the grown person who btw is the kids parent too. Its ludacris but like I said I'm tapping out.

Clearly you and I are not on the same page. I wasn't saying you should be compensated for raising your own children. I have always said that I DO NOT agree with alimony, if the custodial parent needs child support to provide for the children, then I have no problem with that. But marrying someone should NOT make you responsible for supporting them for the rest of their life after the marriage ends.

 

[Espy]

Um, so you're opposed to your spouse getting any insurance money if you die?

That's a bit harsh. Unless I'm misunderstanding you, which is entirely possible cause I'm not sure your post follows hers. I don't think she was suggesting what you think she's suggesting.

Thank you Chi for noticing.

As for life insurance, I think Andrae meant after the divorce that the proceeds should go to the children and not the ex-spouse. I actually agree with that, if that's what he's saying. I think any life insurance should go into a trust for the kids with someone other than the remaining living parent in charge of making sure it goes to benefit the kids.

 

[The Dark King]

Lmao. You have no idea how hard that made me laugh thanks fam

 

[chicity]

Thank you Chi for noticing.

As for life insurance, I think Andrae meant after the divorce that the proceeds should go to the children and not the ex-spouse. I actually agree with that, if that's what he's saying. I think any life insurance should go into a trust for the kids with someone other than the remaining living parent in charge of making sure it goes to benefit the kids.

Yes, I definitely agree with that.

 

[The Dark King]

Just cause you split after the divorce doesn't mean the kids don't need a house to live in and food to eat. It's for the kids not the other spouse. Andrae you get very passionate about this. Why?

Because divorce reminds me how bs love is. Again like I said a bunch of times child support is a no brainer I think the spouse not living with the child should pay more but alimony is plain unfair in most cases because even when no kids are involved men have to pay. What sucks most is that women normally get custody and you are allowed to bound and be there for the most formative years of your childs life when many men are lucky to get every other weekend and not only do you want money for the kids but you want money for you too. That's just plain injustice in my book.

 

[The Dark King]

Yes, I definitely agree with that.

Cosign