Rachel Dolezal NAACP controversy

RaiderLL said:
If someone here is harassing offline, it should be dealt with offline (via police if warranted). If police reports are filed and information is requested by authorities Im sure webbie would respond timely. I don't know that he really owes us anything more?? It's a free site...how far do his obligations reach?
Click to expand...

Good point, especially if the contact has gone beyond talking to actual threats.
 
RaiderLL said:
If someone here is harassing offline, it should be dealt with offline (via police if warranted). If police reports are filed and information is requested by authorities Im sure webbie would respond timely. I don't know that he really owes us anything more?? It's a free site...how far do his obligations reach?
Click to expand...

Fo shizzle
 
orejon4 said:
Good point, especially if the contact has gone beyond talking to actual threats.
Click to expand...

z said:
Fo shizzle
Click to expand...

It's sad to even think that WWBM issues would go that far but barking up webbies tree just seems like a fruitless path. He has no real authority over any of us. He's very much the middle man in a case of forum members harassing/being harassed.
 
RaiderLL said:
It's sad to even think that it would go that far (needing police involvement) but barking up webbies tree just seems like a fruitless path. He has no real authority over any of us. He's very much the middle man in a case of forum members harassing/being harassed.
Click to expand...

Right. I mean, if you're willing to cross the line and actually threaten someone, getting banned from the thread isn't going to be much of a disincentive.
 
orejon4 said:
Right. I mean, if you're willing to cross the line and actually threaten someone, getting banned from the thread isn't going to be much of a disincentive.
Click to expand...

And this is where reality comes into play. Restriction, banning, rep points retraction...means nothing. He hasn't responded to emails, maybe because he has no information to provide or the requesting parties need to follow a different chain of command to get whatever info they want. The idea that he even owes us a response is weird to me. It'd be nice, sure, but it's certainly not owed imo.
 
RaiderLL said:
And this is where reality comes into play. Restriction, banning, rep points retraction...means nothing. He hasn't responded to emails, maybe because he has no information to provide or the requesting parties need to follow a different chain of command to get whatever info they want. The idea that he even owes us a response is weird to me. It'd be nice, sure, but it's certainly not owed imo.
Click to expand...

Another thing is that people can log in using fake IDs and computer-generated IP addresses making it hard to track or know anything for certain.
 
He should still be banned from this site. This is where he made the initial contact. His behavior is also a violation of the forum guidelines which prohibits harassment and stalking. People have been banned for lesser things. Webbie may not have control over offline activities but he does have control over who posts here.
 
orejon4 said:
Another thing is that people can log in using fake IDs and computer-generated IP addresses making it hard to track or know anything for certain.
Click to expand...

Definitely. You never know who you're dealing with and banning someone just means they come back under a different name. Doesn't actually solve anything.
 
Feel bad for the individual who has been violated but why give ur personal data including work address to a total stranger with questionable behavior
 
z said:
Feel bad for the individual who has been violated but why give ur personal data including work address to a total stranger with questionable behavior
Click to expand...

I don't believe she gave out any information voluntarily.
 
Excuse me, it sounded as if this incident was something that happened quite some time ago and had been dealt with, not something that happened recently. Is that not the case?
 
KinCA said:
Excuse me, it sounded as if this incident was something that happened quite some time ago and had been dealt with, not something that happened recently. Is that not the case?
Click to expand...

That's what I thought too. Maybe something happened again?? Sure hope not :smt009
 
KinCA said:
Excuse me, it sounded as if this incident was something that happened quite some time ago and had been dealt with, not something that happened recently. Is that not the case?
Click to expand...


I don't think it was ever really dealt with in any fashion other than the fact that it came to light that someone attempted to use personal information about someone and their activities on this site and their involved in interracial relationships to cause trouble for them offline in their work environment.

The main reason it never was dealt with is because there was more than one individual who was suspected of possibly being the culprit and had a vindictive motive to do it. Recent statements posted by a certain individual, who was long on the suspect list, have now put them in the spotlight of possibly being the guilty party from back then.
 
RaiderLL said:
And this is where reality comes into play. Restriction, banning, rep points retraction...means nothing. He hasn't responded to emails, maybe because he has no information to provide or the requesting parties need to follow a different chain of command to get whatever info they want. The idea that he even owes us a response is weird to me. It'd be nice, sure, but it's certainly not owed imo.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? Of course he owes a response. Those are his requirements - if you have an issue REPORT IT TO ME. I WILL DEAL WITH IT.
How the hell do you think Iggy got banned?, Kid Rasta got banned?..do you think it was because Webbie was active on the board and noticed them? NO. It was because they were reported on . For far much less, mind you.

So miss with the "not owed".
 
Bliss said:
What are you talking about? Of course he owes a response. Those are his requirements - if you have an issue REPORT IT TO ME. I WILL DEAL WITH IT.
How the hell do you think Iggy got banned?, Kid Rasta got banned?..do you think it was because Webbie was active on the board and noticed them? NO. It was because they were reported on . For far much less, mind you.

So miss with the "not owed".
Click to expand...

Lol dude calm down. Everyone you mentioned was BEFORE MY TIME so miss me with your "you should know better" attitude lol. Webbie doesn't owe us shit. If yall reported something, he'll get to it when (and how) he sees fit. Yall ready to lynch the dude for not responding within YOUR timeframe.
 
orejon4 said:
Right. I mean, if you're willing to cross the line and actually threaten someone, getting banned from the thread isn't going to be much of a disincentive.
Click to expand...

orejon4 said:
Another thing is that people can log in using fake IDs and computer-generated IP addresses making it hard to track or know anything for certain.
Click to expand...

Iggy tried that actually, and because webbie is not stupid - he figured it out behind the scenes.

If her forum stalker tried to pull that stunt. it would only serve to further confirm his defective personality disorder...Something restraining orders recognize.
 
RaiderLL said:
Lol dude calm down. Everyone you mentioned was BEFORE MY TIME so miss me with your "you should know better" attitude lol. Webbie doesn't owe us shit. If yall reported something, he'll get to it when (and how) he sees fit. Yall ready to lynch the dude for not responding within YOUR timeframe.
Click to expand...

Seriously dude, just STFU already. You're fucking clueless. If you don't know the history of banning or TOS, or how Webie has addressed lesser issues, just zip it then. Typical you would try to find a round about way to come to the stalker's rescue. But of course you're not the one who is being stalked at your job. Or your kids are next. Then we could tell you to calm down...dude.
 
Ches said:
He should still be banned from this site. This is where he made the initial contact. His behavior is also a violation of the forum guidelines which prohibits harassment and stalking. People have been banned for lesser things. Webbie may not have control over offline activities but he does have control over who posts here.
Click to expand...

He did it before to another female forum member he didn't like. He stalked her, got her personal info through her photo extensions and made a thread on her. Webbie deleted the thread almost immediately...He should have been banned back then.
 
Bliss said:
Seriously dude, just STFU already. You're fucking clueless. If you don't know the history of banning or TOS, or how Webie has addressed lesser issues, just zip it then. Typical you would try to find a round about way to come to the stalker's rescue. But of course you're not the one who is being stalked at your job. Or your kids are next. Then we could tell you to calm down...dude.
Click to expand...

Lolll are you capable of responding without insulting?! Tell me more about the history of banning here lol. How on gods green earth am I coming to the harassers rescue?! Let me break this down bliss...I'm saying stop bullshitting here about how webbie hasn't emailed back and go handle this "stalker". "Coming to the stalkers rescue" yet I already spoke up about the rep someone sent me with all her personal info. But yea...I'm just here to rescue this "stalker"...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom