They apparently weren't law abiding if they committed MURDER jethro. Good try lol. Btw two of those people were confirmed to have mental illnesses so that's not a case of gun ownership but mental illness
Pro-gun episode from Penn and Teller, it does do a good job presenting many sides of the issue however... [YOUTUBE]dhXOuuHcjbs[/YOUTUBE]
and according to this same article, the vast majority of the killers were white males what's your point? tougher restrictions on white males looking to buy guys = less mass murders then right
My argument in the case of meth because the terrorism precautions make no sense to me is PEOPLE STILL COOK A SHIT TON OF METH DESPITE RESTRICTING LAW ABIDING CITIZENS. IT HASN'T CURTAILED A GOD DAMN THING. WAKE UP SAFETY IS A FUCKING ILLUSION
So switch it around, right? TDK keeps making the same point that all us non pro gun owners want to take away the guns. We say no...make it harder and more expensive. And then backs it up with, but if we make it harder to get them (as is one solution) how are law abiding citizens going to ever get their hands on them. And now you with this. Who are you playin? You KNOW they will no more put tougher restrictions on white males than they will on guns.
hey dumb ass they were law-biding before they bought them... sooooo. how will you be able to tell who is mentally ill and who will commit a crime in the future? please tell me nastra-dumbass ?
More-like, can we debunk the myth that the Govt is your friend, lol. Say it with me; allegiance to the country always, to the Govt only when they deserve it. Don't ever trust your Govt is in the business of giving you any kind of power. I know you're trying hard, but you really can't make an American feel bad for exercising their 2nd Right, anymore than you can for those who exercise any of their other ones. The Second Amendment while perhaps not applicable in an absolute literal sense since our Govt can NUKE us, it still serves to symbolically represent a bastion of self-preservation at the hands of tyranny. (And FYI, it's way more than a few hundred thousand guns if Civil War were to break out.) Seriously, enough with the deflections and lay the blame where it belongs, which is at the hand of the mentally-defective perpetrators of crime.
hey sense you brought up cars earlier......lets allow drunks to drive but also remove those damn brakes and seat belts.
So wait hold on your answer to preventing crimes is to treat people as if they already committed them by restricting their access... Smart move wish they'd apply that logic to drugs... wait. Well if they make prostitution illegal and less accessible there will.... wait I got it :smt115 Heavy gun restriction with limited access will give you a perfectly safe area... see you in Chicago GL :smt006
completely unrelated. I'm willing to be proactive in ensuring my own safety rather than believing that restricting others will keep them from doing bad shit. IT NEVER EVER WORKS
Riiiiiiiight.. Because we all know how safe YOU are going to be from your unfriendly government when they nuke you with your arsenal of "fuck the government" guns.
Completely unrelated? Dude....put down the brownies..and think about what you just said in the post i quoted.
mentally defective is a matter of perspective Im telling you people .....the government is controlled by aliens. I have met their leader. His name is Rupert murdoch. he owns foxnews. please believe me. its true. lawd have mercy we are all doomed.
dont need to. the facts are as such. none of the killers had crimnal backrounds. sooooooooo.......they were law biding citzens. so tell me how would you keep a gun from those FUTURE KILLERS
