Romney gave millions to charity. Biden gave $369

[The Dark King]

They spend the least because the majority of their income comes from capital gains taxes. They take a risk and invest their money into companies and if they earn a profit, they reap the rewards. Everyone would have that tax rate if they invested their money. I love how people want jobs, want more money, etc...but love to crucify the rich who created or invested in the companies they work for.

The American consumers created the profits. We can keep going round and round if you'd like.

 

[Alinoa]

The American consumers created the profits. We can keep going round and round if you'd like.

*cough* *cough*

One of THOSE, eh?

Now I'm no genius, but it would seem to me that those who are holding to anything on the right just don't understand math. Like, at all.

If a really wealthy person spends, let's just say for shits and giggles, 23% of their income on "stuff" and everyone else is spending something like 43% percent on "stuff"..well obviously one is adding more to the pot than the other. Not to mention rich people aren't as frequent as the people who almost go broke trying to pay for a over inflated house on a mortgage that's been doctored up to benefit these very *job creators* all the rich love to think they are.

I don't care how much brain cells one has drank away. 23 never equals 43.

And since most American companies have been moved to other countries (I guess that fail to notice that everything is mark 'made in china') how does their investment in these companies "create jobs" for the American people? Sure it "creates jobs" and I suppose "technically" they could be called "job creators"....

And before anyone opens their mouth about how it was Clinton that did THAT, let me remind you that your math is still fucking whack.

Since the 80's we've had...2 dem prez and 3 repubs in office?

Again. If I had 3 dollars. It always be more than 2 dollars. It will also sit directly in the pockets of these people who invest in companies hence creating all the lovely American jobs we have and the brilliant shining economy everyone's enjoying right about now.

 

[The Dark King]

*cough* *cough*

One of THOSE, eh?

Now I'm no genius, but it would seem to me that those who are holding to anything on the right just don't understand math. Like, at all.

If a really wealthy person spends, let's just say for shits and giggles, 23% of their income on "stuff" and everyone else is spending something like 43% percent on "stuff"..well obviously one is adding more to the pot than the other. Not to mention rich people aren't as frequent as the people who almost go broke trying to pay for a over inflated house on a mortgage that's been doctored up to benefit these very *job creators* all the rich love to think they are.

I don't care how much brain cells one has drank away. 23 never equals 43.

And since most American companies have been moved to other countries (I guess that fail to notice that everything is mark 'made in china') how does their investment in these companies "create jobs" for the American people? Sure it "creates jobs" and I suppose "technically" they could be called "job creators"....

And before anyone opens their mouth about how it was Clinton that did THAT, let me remind you that your math is still fucking whack.

Since the 80's we've had...2 dem prez and 3 repubs in office?

Again. If I had 3 dollars. It always be more than 2 dollars. It will also sit directly in the pockets of these people who invest in companies hence creating all the lovely American jobs we have and the brilliant shining economy everyone's enjoying right about now.

Simple ass logic right here

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

Obviously read it wrong.. My bad.

You seem to read a lot of things and people wrong here.

 

[orejon4]

*cough* *cough*

One of THOSE, eh?

Now I'm no genius, but it would seem to me that those who are holding to anything on the right just don't understand math. Like, at all.

If a really wealthy person spends, let's just say for shits and giggles, 23% of their income on "stuff" and everyone else is spending something like 43% percent on "stuff"..well obviously one is adding more to the pot than the other. Not to mention rich people aren't as frequent as the people who almost go broke trying to pay for a over inflated house on a mortgage that's been doctored up to benefit these very *job creators* all the rich love to think they are.

I don't care how much brain cells one has drank away. 23 never equals 43.

And since most American companies have been moved to other countries (I guess that fail to notice that everything is mark 'made in china') how does their investment in these companies "create jobs" for the American people? Sure it "creates jobs" and I suppose "technically" they could be called "job creators"....

And before anyone opens their mouth about how it was Clinton that did THAT, let me remind you that your math is still fucking whack.

Since the 80's we've had...2 dem prez and 3 repubs in office?

Again. If I had 3 dollars. It always be more than 2 dollars. It will also sit directly in the pockets of these people who invest in companies hence creating all the lovely American jobs we have and the brilliant shining economy everyone's enjoying right about now.

Simple ass logic right here

Hey, hey, don't offend the 'Job Creators'! They are the generators of employment and opportunity... in mainland China.

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

I can say the same about how you read me. But it is what it is.

Yeah, kinda of hard to misread someone who is constantly telling others in one form or another he's better than them. Didn't help my perception of you any either with the little "don't hate" message either. What exactly am I "hating on" again since you haven't shown or said anything for me hate on you for?

 

[The Dark King]

Yeah, kinda of hard to misread someone who is constantly telling others in one form or another he's better than them. Didn't help my perception of you any either with the little "don't hate" message either. What exactly am I "hating on" again since you haven't shown or said anything for me hate on you for?

He's a job creator... wait

He's part of the one percent... wait.

He's white.... wait.


Sorry Paniro I tried.

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

Lol you get that from my posts? And you think I read you wrong?

I don't know? You tell me. You're always here telling everyone what's up just as you're doing now to cover your ass and save face.

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

And the negroid still didn't/couldn't tell me what the hell I'm hating on him for.......

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

You're quite concerned with me lol

Ladies and gentlemen I give you the superior class negro who shall one day rule over us all. Just as soon as he obtains "The One Ring"........

 

[Alinoa]

This one time at band camp...I watched this really killer movie.
Gump something.

There were a lot of really classic lines in that movie. Such as
Run Forrest ruuuuunnnnnnnnn!
And...
Life is like a box of chocolate (I think it's more like a car)
And
What was the other one?

He goes down to bubbas family in the south to tell them that their son died in Vietnam. I can't quite remember what it is now.

But it's a classic!

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

time to dip out for a while again.......

....and of course as always the superior negro does his little hoodrat fuckery and runs away to save face....

 

[Tamstrong]

Your words not mine. But hey long as you're who you want to be on this board it's all good.

Actually son, those were your words. You spend a great deal of your time on here tearing others down to build yourself up, which is uncalled for and it doesn't work. It may make you feel better about yourself to talk down to folks the way you do, but it only makes you look bad.

Yeah, kinda of hard to misread someone who is constantly telling others in one form or another he's better than them. Didn't help my perception of you any either with the little "don't hate" message either. What exactly am I "hating on" again since you haven't shown or said anything for me hate on you for?

Exactly, Ra. When we're hearing that from someone all the time, what else are we supposed to think? As far as the "hating on" question goes, I'm curious about the answer to that one myself for the same reason, especially when hating on others is what he does in the majority of his posts.

 

[Bliss]

Part of me wants Romney to win so these fucking idiot babies can have their way and when it all goes to utter shit they'll only have themselves to blame.

You realize this is exactly the same thing Right-wingers said about Obama as he took office? And yet Left-wingers have done nothing else but point the blame at Bush for the sinking of our country.

So then if Romney wins - when "these fucking idiot babies" begin to complain of his direction, expect to hear back the same finger-pointing of blame at the previous Admin/Obama.

 

[The Dark King]

You realize this is exactly the same thing Right-wingers said about Obama as he took office? And yet Left-wingers have done nothing else but point the blame at Bush for the sinking of our country.

So then if Romney wins - when "these fucking idiot babies" begin to complain of his direction, expect to hear back the same finger-pointing of blame at the previous Admin/Obama.

True. Can't expect fairness from the unreasonable.

 

[Alinoa]

You realize this is exactly the same thing Right-wingers said about Obama as he took office? And yet Left-wingers have done nothing else but point the blame at Bush for the sinking of our country.

So then if Romney wins - when "these fucking idiot babies" begin to complain of his direction, expect to hear back the same finger-pointing of blame at the previous Admin/Obama.

I don't know. Given what Obama was given to work with..which was utter shit to begin with (boner anyone?) I'd say he's done a pretty fucking fantastic job keeping us afloat. We are going to sink. That's for a damn fact. But I'd bet you dimes to dollars that it won't be on obamas watch.

 

[Ol'Skool Classic]

You realize this is exactly the same thing Right-wingers said about Obama as he took office? And yet Left-wingers have done nothing else but point the blame at Bush for the sinking of our country.

So then if Romney wins - when "these fucking idiot babies" begin to complain of his direction, expect to hear back the same finger-pointing of blame at the previous Admin/Obama.

They're already blaming Obama for any and everything now......

 

[The Dark King]

I don't know. Given what Obama was given to work with..which was utter shit to begin with (boner anyone?) I'd say he's done a pretty fucking fantastic job keeping us afloat. We are going to sink. That's for a damn fact. But I'd bet you dimes to dollars that it won't be on obamas watch.

We won't totally sink but we're going down the ladder a bit. Probably to number 4 in the next 30 years

 

[orejon4]

You realize this is exactly the same thing Right-wingers said about Obama as he took office? And yet Left-wingers have done nothing else but point the blame at Bush for the sinking of our country.

So then if Romney wins - when "these fucking idiot babies" begin to complain of his direction, expect to hear back the same finger-pointing of blame at the previous Admin/Obama.

Many of the economic forces that have damaged the national and international economy and skewed it away from working people began as far back as the mid-1970s. We can blame administrations for their actual fiscal policy, which has some real consumption and wealth distribution effects in the short run, but the larger trends flow from congressional legislation and executive trade policy. But the trade effects take a while to kick in, whether it's foreign direct investment, preferential treatment on international earnings, etc. The things you can blame on Bush are squandering the surplus with two costly (one of which was a blatant manipulation of the public) wars and allowing (along with Congress), increased financial deregulation (which Clinton arguably started with his Wall Street-heavy economic team). Much of the current economic crisis has its roots in these long-term structural changes, but some of it is just plain old greed and near criminality in the private sector.

 

[The Dark King]

Many of the economic forces that have damaged the national and international economy and skewed it away from working people began as far back as the mid-1970s. We can blame administrations for their actual fiscal policy, which has some real consumption and wealth distribution effects in the short run, but the larger trends flow from congressional legislation and executive trade policy. But the trade effects take a while to kick in, whether it's foreign direct investment, preferential treatment on international earnings, etc. The things you can blame on Bush are squandering the surplus with two costly (one of which was a blatant manipulation of the public) wars and allowing (along with Congress), increased financial deregulation (which Clinton arguably started with his Wall Street-heavy economic team). Much of the current economic crisis has its roots in these long-term structural changes, but some of it is just plain old greed and near criminality in the private sector.

What do you mean near criminality? That shit was blatantly criminal.