Newspaper Publishes Gun Owners' Names and Addresses

Bliss said:
No shit Sherlock, that's the point. Total and blatant disregard toward their constitutional right to carry.

What are you missing here, GL?? :smt017
Click to expand...

There is no Constitutional right to carry firearms down the street for a civilian.:confused:
 
goodlove said:
now go find where I got personal before hand....he also did that with andrebba

but you were cool withg that because he sided your views. right?

civil should only be an one way street?
Click to expand...

GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.
You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
 
goodlove said:
number 1) how is it harassing? if you are a proud gun owner and its public record then embrace it. you guys are always making the argument if the criminals knew that if the city was full of gun owners the crime rate will drop. so there you go....

number 2) america 34 gun related deaths aday......britian below 50 a year.

Suggestions for gun control/restrictions/regulations:

1) owner can not have clips that hold more than 10 rounds.

2) ban on all assault weapons

3)No multiround burst action weapons. (all weapons are to be single shot actions...similar to bolt action rifles. (dont have to be bolt action but in bolt action are only allow one round to be shot [per pull of the trigger).

4) all weapons sold private and through retail must be registered with the state and backround checks must be done.

5) mental evaluations must be done yearly and/or on every sale of a gun. (based on israel gun laws)

6) all first time owners must go through gun course to be certified. recertifications done periodically. (based on israel gun laws)

7) have a federal and a local backround check.

8) any criminal violent arrest and/or conviction or documentation will get you banned from owning a weapon including: domestic violence arrest, restraining orders, disorderly conduct, drunk driving record would have you banned from owning a weapon.

9) any sale to another individual without following these procedures will be held liable for any crime associated with the weapon in question and could face charges equal to the crime committed in which the weapon in question was used.

10) all guns and rounds to have a bar code and entered into a national database. each round will match to the gun registered so it can be traced to the owner.

11) federal tax at a 200% rate on all rounds and guns.


israel allows only 50 rounds to civilians for life. military people the same in private life....per cnn
Click to expand...

Bliss said:
GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.

You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
Click to expand...

OK lets start there.

so you can sit there and say if you disagree its ok to insult......ghee thats what selfcentered.

look at what he agreed to earlier then doisagreed.

also, where did I ever insult his position except to say stay away from the NRA GOP because they have alternative motives and he knows that thats why he ran from em.
 
Bliss said:
GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.
You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
Click to expand...

really!!!! and now you are insulting people but you dont want to be insulted. now thats childish
 
Bliss said:
I know right?? :confused: I don't think he knows what he wants. He's just parrotting.

And TDK was being respectful while others here first were calling him stupid and cursing at him.

Trust me, I was looking out for it to see if he did. He did not start the insults in this thread.
Click to expand...

I think he said he is a cop. In cali the cops are still allowed to have the weapons in their homes that are illegal for everyone else, mabe thats why he is not concerned with our rights.
 
Bliss said:
GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens. You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
Click to expand...

really so to do nothing is a better answer. what would you suggest.....add more guns and see what happens
 
Bliss said:
GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.
You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
Click to expand...

just what I thought....typical right winger. they can insult others but when yo9u come back they want to scream foul then justify hypocrisy
 
goodlove said:
OK lets start there.

so you can sit there and say if you disagree its ok to insult......ghee thats what selfcentered.
Click to expand...

Dude its a dumb question. "what do you need a 30 round clip for"?

Huh? You need it in order to fire multiple rounds. How can you not figure that out.

But what's it to you. It's not your place to tell a legal gun owner how many bullets he can legally fire. Damn. It's a clip, period. Next you'll ask why do we need a 10 round clip, then it'll be why 6, until you say we cant have clips period. :smt012
 
Bliss said:
Dude its a dumb question. "what do you need a 30 round clip for"?

Huh? You need it in order to fire multiple rounds. How can you not figure that out.

But what's it to you. It's not your place to tell a legal gun owner how many bullets he can legally fire. Damn. It's a clip, period. Next you'll ask why do we need a 10 round clip, then it'll be why 6, until you say we cant have clips period. :smt012
Click to expand...

AB already said that. lol
 
Bliss said:
GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.
You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
Click to expand...

if you gop back Im sure me calling HIM bitch not you (but if you want to be included you can) TDK slung that bullshit it...then I returned. so get your facts str8 and stop being a GOP talk show host
 
Bliss said:
GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.
You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.
Click to expand...

Bliss said:
Dude its a dumb question. "what do you need a 30 round clip for"?

Huh? You need it in order to fire multiple rounds. How can you not figure that out.

But what's it to you. It's not your place to tell a legal gun owner how many bullets he can legally fire. Damn. It's a clip, period. Next you'll ask why do we need a 10 round clip, then it'll be why 6, until you say we cant have clips period. :smt012
Click to expand...

guess what.....TDK agreed then disagreed. other gun-owners and NRA members are agreeing with it too.
 
GL, I'm done with you, you're posts are becoming increasingly childish and quite redundant now. Talk to someone else.
 
Bliss said:
Dude its a dumb question. "what do you need a 30 round clip for"?

Huh? You need it in order to fire multiple rounds. How can you not figure that out.

But what's it to you. It's not your place to tell a legal gun owner how many bullets he can legally fire. Damn. It's a clip, period. Next you'll ask why do we need a 10 round clip, then it'll be why 6, until you say we cant have clips period. :smt012
Click to expand...

here is where you lack common sense. all of the mass shootings one thing was common....loughner and CO. the gun jamming or empty clip.

loughner had 30 rnds in 15 seconds killing six wounding 13.....afterwards they were able to tackle him. CO the gun jammed and he gave up.

what does that tell you? also asny gun fight is not gonna last over 30 seconds anyway. if it does....they arent after your tv set.....you pissedf them off.

now you keep insulting me then I will group you with TDK. If you cant talk to like an adult.
 
This morning, I was listening to an interview on NPR regarding what this newspaper did. The host was speaking with a Mayor or Congressman, (I'll edit this once I get the name), who said the paper had also asked for the names and addresses of his constituents and he order that the paper be denied the info.

They discussed the right to information verus the right to privacy, and he said that under law you cannot claim the right to info if u seek that info for profit. He said he will take the paper to the highest court if they try to override the denial.

He said once they list the names of mentally ill, he will re-consider. He said that they don't publish names of rape victims or criminal children because there is a code of ethics and he sees no redeeming reason for it.

But the worst part was this: he said cops and retired cops names are on that list, and now people that they have arrested and such....know where they live, and they are furious.

He said that domestic violence victims and stalked victims who are in hiding and who obtained a gun for protection, now are exposed. He said he has gotten hundreds of calls from tearful, terrified women...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom