Every group has someone they dog out to feel better about themselves. Black people have not always been at the bottom of the pile, nor will we always be. Our current state is a byproduct of a particular, recent economic and racial oppression of the last 400 years. 1,000 years ago, this was not the case. 3,000 - 2,000 years ago, Africans were the dominant force in the Mediterranean and Hebrews were wandering around in the desert and the people who are now Muslims were pagans. Northern Europeans weren't even a blip on the global radar. It is tempting to internalize the way things are now as somehow an essential feature of the world, but I think that moves our eyes off the ball. Nothing is static, and nothing about our current status is predetermined, or part of some eternal struggle.
Again, I never disagreed that black men face racism, nor even that it was intense vis-a-vis other races. I was primarily speaking to the assertion that all other races happily allow white men to do whatever they want to "their" women and object to black men with "their" women, solely as a function of our blackness. There are historical, geopolitical and economic factors that shape the way all people are viewed and the lack of pigmentation is not the sole concern driving the acceptableness of the man dating their sister/mother/countrywoman/etc.
If blackness were the only factor driving all geopolitical events, there would be no blacks on any side of any struggle and the only struggle would be everyone against us. It's a complex mix of issues and melanin count is not the sole criterion.
Sorry andreboba. My bad for getting off track. Now returning to regularly scheduled programming.