Charlottesville protest

I've mentioned in the past that because the U.S. has a 2-party political system, both the Democratic Party & the Republican Party are Big Tent parties. You got groups with different ideologies & interests in both parties.

According to Wikipedia, the Democratic party consists of the following ideologies:

Majority:
Modern liberalism
Social liberalism
Factions:
Centrism
Conservatism
Left-wing populism
Progressivism
Social democracy


So CNN being less liberal than MSNBC doesn't really mean anything.
If you define the Democratic Party this broadly, then almost every network could be described as a "wing of the Democratic party." Are you progressive? That fits the description above. What about socially liberal? Yep. What about conservative? Yep, that's in there, too! How about social democratic? Yep, you're in!
MSNBC & CNN being thought of as arm of the DNC has more to do with that their owned by major corporations.
 
The word "conspiracy" comes from Latin, so unless the CIA is 2000+ years old, I don't think they invented it.

I do think it's important to note one thing: I'd believe a *lot* more conspiracies if they had external validation, and didn't rely on vast cover ups to explain why they haven't come to light. For instance, if the head of the CIA, the head of the NSA, and the Director of National Intelligence all came out and said "Yes, the moon landing was a hoax," I'd be much more likely to believe in moon landing conspiracies.
Well, we might both be wrong.:p I should have added 'theory".
The word conspire until last century meant "to breathe".
So the meaning and use of that meaning is what's key here. Like the word gay. Its original intent died decades ago...lol

According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word “conspiracy” is from 1386; “conspiracy theory” is from 1909. Before 1386 the word “conspire” simply meant to breathe together. After the word “conspiracy” was born, the root word “conspire” took on a new meaning – to plot something wrong, evil or illegal.

@ your second paragraph, but what if those agency's created the hoax, then why would they? :cool:
I think if you're going to cite a conspiracy theory you should have some proof and ample arguments as to why you think it.
 
Has Fox ever tried to hide it?
Though they have a couple of left wing hosts.
You can add NBC, CBS and NBC News to your list.

s5Liw42.gif
 
So what would be President Trump's cover up then? That he knew and did nothing? What could he do? Obama was President and knew and did nothing, anyway you slice it.

Additionally, I know this wasn't discussed when it happened bar my one post on it..

But let me ask you...if this had been Trump and not Obama saying the identical hot mic comment, would the liberal media and the Left not go insane?

Obama to Russia: ‘After My Election I Have More Flexibility’

MAR 26, 2012 | By DANIEL HALPER


280x280-n_6b6f1c15666716b6cc37f5c1474dda78.jpg



President Obama got caught in private conversation with a hot mic today in Seoul, South Korea, telling outgoing Russian president Dmitry Medvedev that Vladimir Putin should give him more "space" and that "[a]fter my election I have more flexibility."


President Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space."

President Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…"

President Obama: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."

President Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir, and I stand with you.

Per the link you posted Bliss, there is certainly no consensus that President Obama "did nothing" with the warnings of Russian hacking, there are claims that his administration took decisive action on the warnings. As you have noticed im sure, I have not said anything one way or the other about Russia and Trump as yet, most of our top military and intelligence agencies have stated emphatically that there is evidence that Russia did interfere with our election. That being said, I am waiting for the Meuller report and more details before taking a position one way or another on Trump and collusion, whether one believes Trump jr.'s meeting was innocuous or collusion is still to be determined. The fact that Meuller is using a grand jury, does take the Russia investigation to a whole higher level of seriousness, but until we know more I will wait.

As far as President Obama's flexibility comment, was President Obama stating the obvious and simply admitting that he will enjoy more flexibility in the realm of foreign policy after he was reelected? Or was he revealing more than meets the eye and actually planed on capitulating to Russian demands? Given the frosty/contentious (Obama championed the current sanctions that are in place against Russia) relationship between Putin and Obama throughout most of his 8 years, I find it hard to believe he was somehow bending over for them.

The left did freak out (and rightly so) when Trump said he respected Putin, and shied away from condemning Putin as a killer, by saying "There are a lot of killers. You think our country's so innocent?"

 
So what would be President Trump's cover up then? That he knew and did nothing? What could he do? Obama was President and knew and did nothing, anyway you slice it.

Additionally, I know this wasn't discussed when it happened bar my one post on it..

But let me ask you...if this had been Trump and not Obama saying the identical hot mic comment, would the liberal media and the Left not go insane?

Obama to Russia: ‘After My Election I Have More Flexibility’

MAR 26, 2012 | By DANIEL HALPER


280x280-n_6b6f1c15666716b6cc37f5c1474dda78.jpg



President Obama got caught in private conversation with a hot mic today in Seoul, South Korea, telling outgoing Russian president Dmitry Medvedev that Vladimir Putin should give him more "space" and that "[a]fter my election I have more flexibility."


President Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space."

President Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…"

President Obama: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."

President Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir, and I stand with you.

Space and flexibility to do WHAT exactly???

Know that RT actually is a state run news organization, not an independent entity with a particular political bias.

IMO these are normal state to state negotiations. If however Obama was suggesting something about Obama winning the 2012 election, that would be different.

What Trump is accused of doing is on a totally different level.
 
Space and flexibility to do WHAT exactly???

Know that RT actually is a state run news organization, not an independent entity with a particular political bias.

IMO these are normal state to state negotiations. If however Obama was suggesting something about Obama winning the 2012 election, that would be different.

What Trump is accused of doing is on a totally different level.
It sure is. I saw RT years back and it is indeed a arm of Putin's Russia.
 
James O'Keefe, does not have a very good reputation Bliss, http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/22/media/james-okeefe-cnn/index.html, he has been convicted of misdemeanor crimes and is currently under probation, has been forced to pay $100,000 in a lawsuit settlement, has been accused (not convicted) of sexual assault, and has very low credibility. All of that is not to say that it's impossible for him to produce real information, and break real news, but again, not the most credible source.

CNN parted ways with Brazile, most mainstream news outlets pay partisan talking heads for their contributions.

Lastly, of course CNN and other outlets are focusing on Russia, it *could* be a huge, criminal charges, impeachment, removal from office issue, thats going to get ratings for sure. We agree, that so far there has been no concrete proof presented, we must all wait for the Mueller investigation to finish, and then, hopefully we will have more information to review.

What I see in your links is what I have always said, there is always "spin" in the media, for both liberals and conservatives, which is why it is so important to be able to look at both sides, read between the lines, and discern the truth. Writing off one side or the other as "fake news" puts you in the pocket of, and vulnerable to only one side of the story.
James O'Keefe is no other than the lowest form when it comes to his form of "investigative" journalism.
 
James O'Keefe is no other than the lowest form when it comes to his form of "investigative" journalism.
Why? He exposed Planned Parenthoid for their dubious at best, aborted fetus shenanigans.
Sure, 15 privacy felony charges by CALIFORNIA (not on him) and a recently filed Suit on privacy issues is in the works over it, but as he signaled, he is ready to fight: “Robert Creamer believes that by suing us, he can intimidate us. I will not be silenced—only over my dead body!”
 
Space and flexibility to do WHAT exactly???

Know that RT actually is a state run news organization, not an independent entity with a particular political bias.

IMO these are normal state to state negotiations. If however Obama was suggesting something about Obama winning the 2012 election, that would be different.

What Trump is accused of doing is on a totally different level.
RT has nothing to do with it..l could have used another outlet.

Do tell, what is Trump accused of doing again? Lol smh...( let's hear it AB)
"Hillary, you will not go to Wisconsin! "Yes Putin, ok".
" Hillary, you will ignore the blue collar and LEO's"
"Yes Putin, Sir."

I could go on, but really.
She herself blames COMEY!
And the DNC. Lol.
And her staff's leaked emails!
And Bernie's supporters!
And sexism! And misogyny!

(Everyone, but herself)
 
Last edited:
Why? He exposed Planned Parenthoid for their dubious at best, aborted fetus shenanigans.
Sure, 15 privacy felony charges by CALIFORNIA (not on him) and a recently filed Suit on privacy issues is in the works over it, but as he signaled, he is ready to fight: “Robert Creamer believes that by suing us, he can intimidate us. I will not be silenced—only over my dead body!”
He play a stereotypical pimp with that woman playing a "ho". He got in trouble on that.
 
$tormfront has been shut down: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/26/racist site-internets-longest-running-white-suprema/
Wow. I wonder if they were expecting it? It's great, but could be bad too. They will likely operate under the cloak of the dark web where you can't keep tabs on them. Worse, it might rise to an independent Web hosting company that is owned and controlled by Racist groups. Hope not.
They must be spitting mad :D

* omygod at the irony...lol
"...Neither the registrar, Web.com nor racist site’s administrator, Don Black..."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom