I guess we're both tired of those old thread-bare cliches.

You should hear what Dick Gregory says about it..lol

Go to youtube and check it out.

 

Damn this brotha is real.

 

Can you post the Dick's youtube comments??

I wish I knew how.

 

In a minute I'm currently watching dudes State of Black People 08 joint. Some damn good stuff. We really need to wake the fuck up.

 

You two are completely right. Don't believe in this garbage. We as a race hold ourselves to a higher standard than that.

 

Finally we agree

 

You think just because y'all run down a list of other people that hate each other, that dispels what I've said....not in the least, the same thing could be said about them.

 

Remind me again mr. moderator, what site are we on?

 

So logic would yield that its all people then dumb ass. Thanks for proving my point.

 

Anyone can EDIT wikipedia but NOT EVERY THREAD CAN BE CREATED on wikipedia, if you create a page about yourself it's gonna get deleted because it's not relevant, not everything is wikipedia material, so if something is not on wikipedia it's because it's not relevant.
No offense but that was the stupidest comment ever made in this thread.

 

The point of the comment was to prove just how limited you are in your thinking and point of view and that you rely too heavily on the internet to obtain any "facts" that you use to prove your points. The fact that you pointed out what wikipedia considers relevent proves that you obviously use Wikepedia as a reputable source to gain your "facts" to form your opinions.

 

Stop engaging crazy fam. Its totally pointless.

 

I'm bored right now otherwise I normally wouldn't.

 

I was never discluding anyone my oh so intelligent friend. I mentioned black people because that's whom my focus was on, and I believe suufer the most.

 

Generally speaking we are disliked around the world...obviously if we accepted broadly by white people there would a lot less demand for the website, among other things.

 

The point of your comment? oh please, that was a stupid and pointless comment, you were implying anyone could create any article on wikipedia, which is not true, you screwed up, admit it.

PS: I reiterate my point, it's not about wikipedia being reliable or not, I'm just saying anything that is even remotely important is on wikipedia, I don't know h0ow anyone can disagree with something so obvious.

 

Only a fool would cite Wikipedia as a credible reference source.

I'v had professors who'd be willing to FAIL you on principle for footnoting some bullshit you read on Wiki as a 'fact based' source.

There's no oversight on Wiki, no vetting, no source verification and very little if at all peer review of the information posted.

Wiki is the internet version of a billboard encyclopedia. Just because you post a page doesn't make it 'official'.


How the hell can someone with an alleged Bachelor's of Science in Physics believe wholeheartedly in a Website as 'unscientific' and widely criticized for disseminating false and misleading information as Wiki is really unbelievable.

'But I read it on Wiki, it must be true."

GTFOH, Empyrium.

With this Wiki crap empyrium, you have NO BUSINESS questioning the contributions of anyone, their merit, credentials, or lack thereof.:smt021

 

wikipedia is for lazy, discount-ass mothafuckas

all of my classes say quoting wiki will land you a F

 

Your comprehension skills are obviously lacking, I did NOT say wikipedia is a credible reference source, I said if something is not on wikipedia is because is not relevant, if you start an article that is not relevant it gets deleted, I didn't say anything about the information contained in wikipedia being credible, it's not, since anyone can freely edit it.
The only reason you're still on about it is because you completely lost your argument.