strike me secondhand...you men...!!! where's that bloody peace pipe and olive branch when you need it...??? to quote President Dale out of Mars Attacks... "Why can't we work out our differences? Why can't we work things out? (Little people), why can't we all just get along?"
This has more to do with the hips than the fat. It is getting harder and harder for women to push out children because of the size of the baby's head(which has increased over time). Hence the c-section increase.If a woman's hips are bigger then it is easier to slide the kid out. I was almost 10 pounds, according to my mom. I don't know how many women want to push out a ten pound baby even with wide hips let alone a small one.
Sorry to disagree, but it has nothing to do with hip width Archangel, it's the pelvis that determines what size baby a woman can have naturally. Narrow pelvis = C-section, wide pelvis = vaginal delivery. A woman can have wide hips and a narrow pelvis, or narrow hips and a wide pelvis. The two are not necessarily related. I know a woman who delivered a 13 pound baby vaginally and one that had to have a C-section for a 7 pound baby. Size of the baby, and and size of the hips are irrelevant, it's the pelvis that matters.
You know what I find interesting is she was 4' 10" and about 90 pounds soaking wet, and had really narrow hips. So just goes to show that whole child-bearing hip thing really is unsubstantiated crap. I tried to use that as an example when my OB was telling me there was no way I could deliver a child over 6 pounds naturally, and that's when he explained to me how it really works. I was seriously pissed off. :smt011
ok if you are so smart ... and you abviously pull that off the net yourself... answer this.... Im sure andrae can answer this question and an einstein like you can do it since Im very stupid. here are the questions. there are 4 financial statements every business must file . Inc/statement, balance sheet , Ret earning statement and cash flow statement. after the auditors file the audit statement and the business make the statements public. what statement(s) would the common sense investor would use to make an educated geuss to put his money in and why ? also how far back textbook recommended would an investor go back on the statements to make a decent evaluation and how far back is best to go to make an better evaluation on a business to invest and why ? lastly , what are the best ratios to use to find out if the business is the best one to use to see if the business is performing well and how will you be able to say this is the best one to invest in ? this is a real life some thing that you can use....My answer maybe contested but they will agree with my answer in that it maybe the better of them all after it is explained. If you cant answer that then here is a very very simple question...... DR. CR. what does this stand for and what does it mean? hint: you use this every month.
blah blah income statement, retained earnings, cash flows or sometimes income, cash flows, balance sheet why? historical + current assessement english is your first language? historical financial assessment. 4-5 years. Why? Based on income statement, obviously you want to see where the money came from, where it is, and predict where it will be in the future. too many to name however ,most common: earning per share shut up Dediber Creditor Obviously debit is an asset credit is a liability lol
Well my son was just under 10lbs and I managed to push him out lol. My hips aren't that big, I'm like 34/25/34 and 125lbs. So ya, I think it has a lot to do with pelvis as opposed to hips. They used the ventouse though, dunno if that makes a difference.
you are definitely a dumb ass !!!!! 1st. it is called debit and credit. those are the indicators of what columns to put the monetary amounts in for the journal entries. I have no idea what a Dediber is . Is that even a word ? Creditor is someone you owe money to. you big dummy the best F/S to go to 1st is the cashflow because you want to see how they are using the cash ie... are the going into debt are they fiscally displine ect... you then move on to the balance sheet and you want to see how solvent and liquid they are. any ratio that will give these amounts. current and longterm ratios. Im very favorable to longterm because you want to see if they will be around along time and you can also tell if they are planning for the future. they may have something coming down the pike ( look at the RandD spending if they are that type of co. that will have that) the inc/statement you want to look at the profit margin and look at the cogs sold because you want to see how many units are being sold from yr to yr. who gives a real crap if they made X-amt of money if they profit margin sucks and the units sold has stabled or decline. when it comes to units sold between the 2 i would choose the units sold stabilizing not declining. so always get the cogs and look at it thoroughly. they could be on the decline in sells but marking up the price to keep a good profit margin ( that would be dumb but i would look anyway because dumber things have happened) 3-5 yrs is textbook and that is fine but if you can get up to 10 years (depending on the age of the company) you can really get a better guess of what they are able to sustain in the future. use the appropriate financial ratios and measure it against the industry theyu are in. real shit billy bob. fire the person who gave the answers to you
hahaah goodlove, youre too stupid to understand just how stupid you really are. So I will keep this very simple for you The fact is, i gave you a "reasonably simple" logical reasoning (ie unbiased, general) question. You don’t have to be a maths wiz to manipulate a formula nor do you need to be taking a maths course at your community college. Your questions were biased to underwriting/accounting. My initial reaction after reading them was "is this guy really THIS fucking stupid"? I wouldn’t ask a random bloke specific engineering questions. In fact I wouldn’t even ask an electrical engineer specific civil engineering questions. I got the financial statements question RIGHT and quiet frankly, your opinion is as useful as a used condom, so I did not bother reading your blah blah blah (it lowers the IQ) I got the maximum years right. 3-5 years is the same as 4-5 years since you asked for the MAXIMUM (which is 5) I got the ratios right since it was a "subjective"(look it up) question I got the CR/DR right. If you actually read the lines that followed youd know what I meant. The "dediber" is obviously a TYPO (ie debitor..not dediber…get it??) lmao. But to be specific DR actually means Debit RECORD(of a debitor) and not just debit. Funny I guessed all those answers So put the pipe down (just for a sec) and read the book "maths for dummies" And in case u do pursue a maths "teaching" career (ahahaha…no wait…HAHAHAHAHA) my suggestion would be to start studying the basics, as in, junior high school maths. But even then, I bet any high school could find the dimmest ,dumbest ,most retarded maths student in class (IQ=41), and still trust his maths skills (and intelligence) more than yours...hm??... Im sorry but i just dont see anyone paying you for incompetence when they can find a crackhead (kinda like you) off the streets(kinda like u) for free.....hmm??? lol….retard later
