Well the whole world may not think like you, but I sure do. :smt023 Couldn't have been a more accurate reflection of my thoughts if I'd written it myself.
UC1,you hit it on the head on this one. O.J. went with a lot of WW like for example Tawny Katean and many others. Tiger Woods went with a lot of WW. Both were married when they cheated.
The majority of blacks couldn’t give a rat’s ass about Tiger. He’s just another O.J. Simpson, dazed and confused. Yeah I know that blacks were stupid enough to get behind O.J. But that was the past; hopefully.The problem is that you have people who believe that any black person who either makes a bunch of money or has status will by default be embraced by the black community. He, not us, decided that he was NOT going to be a part of the black community. Now that he has fallen from the good graces of some white people’s sensibilities, let’s play up the black community divide. When in the hell have you ever, EVER seen Tiger doing anything for or in the black community? He DOESN'T play in the black community, he DOESN'T live in the black community, he DOESN'T spend any time for any reason in the black community and has NO ties, marriage or otherwise to the black community.The last tie that guy had to the black community was his father and when he died so did that tie
Pack of lies, but thanks for passing on the urban legends. Btw, what determines a "black community"? Because the neighbor who called the cops was Black, so at the very least he's not the only Black person living there. Also, it's nice to know that all the African American children who have been helped by Tiger, and all the Black Men employed by Tiger, don't really exist. Who knew holograms were amongst us already? But yeah, you hit the nail on the head there: he married a White Woman. He must be a witch! Burn him, quick!
LOL@ a pro-rapist calling someone else OJ. Out of you & Tiger, I think most Women would feel safer if Tiger was the one holding a knife.
I agree with you, the fact that the black community was overwhelmingly behind OJ Simpson is mind boggling to me. It was a mentality of "heck, he killed whites, why should I care?" kinda thing with complete disregard to DNA and other circumstantial evidences not to mention the loss of two human beings. As for Tiger goes though, don't forget that he's multiracial. If I remember correctly he's only 1/4th African-American (though one may argue it was strong enough to make a serial cheater of him). I've never heard him denounce that. He acknowledges his blackness as well as he does his asian heritage. In fact, he's more Asian (hence he crashed the Cadillac) than he is black. What evidence do you see that he's playing the black community now? If by marrying a white women he's distancing himself from the black community, are you doing the same thing you're criticizing him of by being a member of wwbm? If you had the kinda money that Tiger does, where would you live? I would assume you would live in the best neighborhood you could afford even if it happens to be a white community. Now, with exception of very few, most affluent communities in the U.S. happen to be predominantly white. Therefore, your choices are limited. Or would you KEEP IT REAL and live in the projects? I doubt you would.
Tiger's not a witch because he married a white woman. He's just a boring, self-absorbed, entitled, immature, philandering prick. I sensed he was a bit of an ass because of the way he acted on the golf course. Yet I was totally indifferent to him before we found out about his harem. But he will be fine. He'll get his sponsors back, He'll break Nicholas' record, He'll remarry and all will be right in the world of golf ............zzzzzzz.
Well, guys, another sponsor has dropped him this morning, this time, it's Gatorade. I couldn't give a rat's ass about Tiger Woods. So glad that more sponsors are going to dropping him.
No it wouldn't. Most men want to have kids; they want to have families. They want to watch their kids grow up while living in the same household and not be limited to weekly or bi-weekly visits. The thing is, the urge to bang different women will always be there. With the temptation that celebs have, it's just a matter of time before a lot of them succumb. Oh and ladies...don't think I forgot about you. Y'all(women) like to creep as much as, or maybe even more,than us men. Statistics show that the most common reason men give for filing for divorce is infidelity; for women, it's irrational behavior. The reason women "seem" to get a pass on this is that men are far less likely to admit that there woman is stepping out on them. It's ego thing.
You think so? I always figured it was for what you said earlier about wanting to see their kids because when divorce happens no matter who is at fault the women usually keep the kids.
I was just using the "reason for divorce" as an example just to point out that men and women cheat a lot. When I said that men are much less likely to admit that their women cheated, I meant relationships in general, not just marriage. Men are less likely to admit to the world that their woman cheated them. They admit it, but a lot less than women.
Actually this has been discussed in several other threads fairly recently and the percentage of men and women who cheat is reasonably close with men slightly over the 50% mark and women slightly under the 50% mark in the US. However 75% of men and women stated they would cheat if they thought they could do so without getting caught. The main difference is the reason men and women cheat. In my experience men are just as open to telling people their spouse or girlfriend cheated as women are. In fact a lot of them seem quick to throw that out, as I think most people consider that a deal-breaker, so it's like saying 'the relationship failed, but it wasn't my fault, it had to end because of what she did'. Not saying that's everyone, it just fits a lot of people I know. Claiming a spouse committed adultery doesn't really give anyone an advantage in a divorce in most states. It can be listed as grounds for divorce, but only if you can irrefutably prove the allegation, and even then it's not likely to impact custody. Whether you cheat on your spouse or not, is no indicator of what kind of parent you are. The courts strive to ensure both parents have equal presence in their children's lives, unless there's a reason they shouldn't, such as addiction or abuse.
Oh yeah but men have limited access. I know I'm not the type of man to be a weekend dad. I'd need to be there every single day. Why have them if you can't truly be in their lives.
Good for you Andrae, but there are some men who don't even want to be a weekend Dad. Sadly some people simply were not well equipped to be parents. Personally I don't have an issue with a man who wants to see his children every day, I'd have difficulty not at least talking to mine every day, so I can appreciate how hard only seeing them once a week would be for any parent.
