I have fallen in love with dragon age rigins. I know I am late to the party but I couldn't get pass how boring the beginning is. Now I am at the point where there is so much to learn. It seems more complex than mass effect.( by that I mean there s more if then scenarios.) I may have to buy the next one despite people stating how bad it is.
DragonAge 2 isn't horrible it just feels kind of rushed. However, it has a couple of cool things that I like: The game makes the relatives of your main character share the same skin color, also the games story has one of the most realistic uses of the passage of time that I've seen in a rpg. By now it must be pretty cheap. So if you can find it under $15 I'd say pick it up.
Yea, I'll think about it. You have to really plan a lot of things out in this game. I can't go in guns blazing like in mass effect. There has been a significant between kotr and this game for me so I have to relearn the strategy. I can't wait for the next mass effect though. though much like everyone else, I want shepard.
Mass Effect 3 left a bad taste in my mouth. They are really gonna have to wow me with next-gen graphics and gameplay, to get me excited for the series again.
What was bad about it? That series is the standard of greatness in video games for me. Yes, the ending film was disappointing to a degree but I was never about that. I was along for the ride and they gave a good one.
In Mass Effect 2 your decisions and preparedness was important if you wanted to keep all your team members alive and get the "shepard lives" ending. Mass Effect 3 made even bigger promises of massive armies and multiple endings. But in the end nothing you did mattered at all.
Huh??? How is Tom Hiddleston going to play both Loki & Dr. Strange in a shared movie universe???? Guy Pearce would have been my choice to replace Edward Norton over Mark Ruffalo. How do you go from a properly skinny & bummy looking take on Bruce Banner to a stocky & well dressed Bruce Banner?? And if Edward Norton hadn't already played Bruce Banner he would be a good choice to play Doctor Strange.
meh... I felt they delivered on that(or at least a large amount of collectors) but I think you mean the endings were too similar. I may be wrong though. It is really subjective. I didn't see their marketing campaign during the time.
Something I think is interesting [YOUTUBE]TLHuRuLnKIk[/YOUTUBE] Kevin Conroy is still the best but I like Bruce Greenwood too. [YOUTUBE]wA9k_LXpDrY[/YOUTUBE] I know most people like the sandpaper versions of Steve Blum and Cal Dodd But they sound to "cartoony" to me I like the slightly more natural sounding Scott McNeil.
Scott McNeill doesn't fit. And yeah, I still remember him voicing Piccolo with that loud and silly voice.
I agree with you about batman. I loved bruce in young justice. I also loved brent spiner as the joker. a shame, he hasn't taken over the second place spot with hamil as first. I think the guy who played robocop is fourth only to the batman from justice league: crisis on two earths. I loved the line similiar to I want you to know superman that I beat you lol. That is how you do a superman vs batman fight!!!! It can not be contained in one movie warner brothers!!!!! You have to build for a climax. I grew up with cal dodd like kevin and mark so he will always be the wolverine for me. none of these guys really fit though. anything short of the joker for mark hamil puts me off. I love blum but he also doesn't do it. He needs to stick with cowboy bebop spike characters. I realize that some of you are going to say wolverine is like that. I see the comparisons too but spike was more funnier than wolverine who is almost always serious.
Tom Hiddleston can do Dr. Strange. He once said that he enjoys playing in super hero films. Villains mostly. As far back as I remember, Loki had never ventured into Dr. Strange's realm. If he did, he would be in league with Dr. Strange's enemies. But, Loki is an ambitious and opportunistic egomaniac. He is great as Loki. I'd like to see him do another character like Chris Evans did as Johnny Storm in The Fantastic Four and Captain America.
And this is exactly what my earlier bitch about Hollywood & comic movies is: Using the same small pool of actors to play characters. Yes, Tom Hiddleston's a very talented actor but why would you want to see him playing another Marvel character rather than letting someone else take on the role who may be just as good or may even be better suited to the role than he would be if they were cast? Especially if they ever decide to do the unexpected like have Loki & Dr. Strange meet & confront each other in a movie? Hiddleston made the character of Loki his. Someone should at least have the chance to do the same with Doctor Strange. Just my opinion however.
Son of Batman Kind of late after the kid being killed but it looks fascinating. Damian's voice reminds me of the boondocks.