? So when people are taken off life support you call that murder? How am I supposed to prove common sense? lol I guess people that are on life support should be kept on it for the rest of their "lives" or its murder according to you. So that means some people could live 50 years on life support at the expense of the government. Or perhaps your expense, since you are the one who wants to make it a law.
procreation if you want to be technical, but by that same logic you shouldn't enjoy a blowjob because that's not the scientific purpose of a women's mouth.
I'm pretty sure it can be proven that people have sex for pleasure buy showing pleasure centers being excited in the brain during sex. Such a study would be a huge waste of money like many other studies that confirm the shit that everyone except goodlove already knows.
Beginning of life is not a heartbeat, maybe a first breath? Idk but a 6 week EGA pregnancy is not a life IMO. Anyways, a BORN premature baby is not at all the same thing as what we're discussing here and that argument really makes me question your ability to view this topic intellectually as opposed to emotionally. A premature baby receiving life saving efforts, is BORN and potentially viable, thus a "life" by any legal metric. You cannot equate medical equipment (an "incubator") to a human being. Please tell me you understand that? Honestly I get so tired of religious conservatives and their attempts to reduce women's reproductive rights. Just because you consider a clump of cells the size of a pen dot, a "life", doesn't mean Jane Doe has to. Your beliefs should not override or infringe upon hers. If that's a life to you, great. I support your right to continue any and every unintended pregnancy you find yourself faced with. Equally so, I support Jane Doe's right to do whatever she feels is best for her body, including terminating an undesired pregnancy. Religious conservatives have no right to try and force their beliefs and way of life on others. It's sickening.
Stop throwing Raider's name in it, she doesn't agree with you lol......talk about being desperate lmao. The law of probability is Science. Condoms break, that's a fact. You should know that more than her. You are the one with a dick. Throw in all the prevention you want, the fact is unwanted pregnancies will keep happening as long as people keep having sex: fact. Of course sex is also for bonding. So why do you keep asking the same question about the primary function of sex? For some the primary reason may be different. Fact is people would rather be stuck with an unexpected pregnancy with someone they have committed their life too (marriage) than someone they just met at a bar and fucked for one night of pleasure. Obtuse much?
I was wondering why he kept throwing my name out there. I agreed with him when he advocated for getting contraception and plan b to our youth...but then I realized he didn't grasp how plan b actually worked lol. I'd imagine he's since rescinded his approval of that pharmaceutical intervention lol.
You used the word "believe" Since when is that word ever used in Science? LMAO. Goodlove, take your medicine and lay down somewhere...lol
Well according to goodlove she better woman up and handle her responsibilities . She knew what she was doing when she laid down.
You mentioned incubator and I never mentioned anything about religion. Now you want to move the line for your logic because someone asked a tough question. Show me where I mentioned religion. This discussion has been based on science and the philosophy of when does life begin. You guys hate religion so it's out. I have stayed on science and philosophy. Show me where I mentioned religion. It's funny people who called themselves progressive are the most intolerant . You can't call yourself a progressive if you aren't willing to look at every angle and ask yourself is it ethical...not just legal but ethical. This is called a forum. Look the word up
I didn't say raider agree with me. I said we talked about preventing pregnancy. That's what I said. Go back and read.
Scientists call it hypothesis. See the link....it's a synonym to the word hypothesis. www.thesaurus.com/browse/hypothesis They just found the heartbeat. So evidently scientist believed something so they kept looking. I said this a long time ago when blood unites it's a new creation and now science may prove that. Btw if I'm not mistaken...blood is tissue
That's right. Equality. I live on principle...you don't. The dude who wants a patriarchal society but want the women and kids to fend for themselves. Lol. Gtfoh
I mentioned your name cause you and I talked about prevention. That's what you and I talked about from the beginning. I told him that. All you had to do was read what I posted to him and you know we did talk about that. That shows that you and Beasty are being dishonest in this conversation. Very immature
It's pleasurable so you will do it. Also it's scientifically proven its good for your mental health . I said that earlier Here's a small article on that www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/07/what_is_dopamine_love_lust_sex_addiction_gambling_motivation_reward.html
Since you guys like being dishonest and dance around the question... The primary function of sex is to reproduce. You can bs all you want but that's science. Like I said earlier or alluded to earlier there's just cause you can doesn't mean you should. In other words is it legal versus ethical? What role does the government has?
It's difficult for me to understand that someone would think the moment of life begins with blood mixing. Blood mixing has nothing to do with creation of life. 2 people's blood can unite and guess what - NOTHING happens. Do we need a basic reproductive lesson here? The sperm has to not only enter the egg but then cell division has to occur and continue before ANYTHING develops. GL seriously.....you need help dude. Your conversation is just continued twisting.