SO challenges registry

Discussion in 'In the News' started by fly girl, Nov 28, 2008.

  1. fly girl

    fly girl Well-Known Member

    Sex offender files lawsuit to get off list

    Punishment called cruel and unusual for high school act

    By Bill Rankin
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Saturday, November 22, 2008


    The lead plaintiff in a federal lawsuit that seeks to overturn parts of Georgia’s sex-offender registry law is now trying to eliminate her classification as a sex offender.


    Wendy Whitaker’s status as an offender violates the Constitution’s guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment, says her new lawsuit, filed Friday in Columbia County Superior Court.



    Whitaker, 29, is on the registry for having consensual oral sex with a classmate three weeks before his 16th birthday. Whitaker had just turned 17. Both were high school sophomores.


    Because of her 1997 sodomy conviction, Whitaker must register as a sex offender for life and comply with the law’s residency restrictions that bar her from living within 1,000 feet of designated areas where children congregate.


    “I am at my wit’s end and in a constant state of stress because I never know what’s going to happen to my family and our home,” Whitaker said in a statement issued Friday.


    The suit was filed on Whitaker’s behalf by lawyers for the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta.


    Russ Willard, a spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office, declined comment, saying the office had yet to see the lawsuit.



    Whitaker’s designation as a sex offender is grossly out of proportion with the severity of her crime, the suit said.


    It cites the 2007 decision by the state Supreme Court that overturned Genarlow Wilson’s conviction in Douglas County. Wilson was serving a 10-year sentence for having oral sex with a 15-year-old when he was 17.
    The gravity of Whitaker’s offense “bears no reasonable relationship” to the harshness of her penalty, such as the state high court found in Wilson’s case, the lawsuit said.


    In the separate, federal suit, filed in 2006, Whitaker and other plaintiffs are seeking to overturn the law’s provisions that make it a crime for sex offenders to live or work within 1,000 feet of places children congregate.
    At a recent hearing, U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper declined to halt Whitaker’s eviction from her home near Augusta because it is within 1,000 feet of a day care center and church.


    Whitaker testified that if she and her husband are forced out of their home, it will go into foreclosure because they cannot afford both rent and a mortgage.


    Friday’s lawsuit also seeks to halt Whitaker’s eviction from her home in Harlem.
     
  2. Liquid Swords

    Liquid Swords New Member

    What? She has to register as a sex offender cause she gave a 15 year old head when she was 17?

    That's a bit much. Feel sorry for her.
     
  3. GFunk

    GFunk Well-Known Member

    That's shitty. Punishment should fit the crime.
     
  4. cowboysfan94103

    cowboysfan94103 New Member

    Man if a hot 17 year old wanted to give me head when I was 15, I sure as hell would not have cried "rape", lol.
     
  5. Tinkerbell

    Tinkerbell New Member

    The young man probably didn't I've seen parents do it because they don't like the relationship with their child. It's a tactic to get them to break up originally and then it gets out of hand and someone ends up in jail, because the person who originally reported it can't take it back once it's in the states hands, and they are required to prosecute.
     

Share This Page