we are fam. tell us what ails you. we are not doctors ... we just play one on tv...so go right ahead.
I'm in random thought mode today. 1. I wonder why some people have to view the world in terms of 'us' and 'them'? You know those people who assume anyone they don't personally happen to like is in the 'them' category and therefore everyone they know must also dislike them by proxy or they'll get moved from the 'us' category to the 'them' category as well. I don't work like that, I determine like and dislike based upon individual interaction, and I would never take someone else's word on anything, I would research, observe, and interact on my own before drawing a conclusion. I think people who don't, who just expect everyone to take their word on who they should, or should not associate with, are narcissitic and narrow-minded. It is just really ridiculous to me that some people think everyone has to 'choose a side'. Not to mention that sometimes people go from a dislike to a like once you get to know them better, or vice versa. That's not static for me, it's very fluid and always subject to change. You really have to screw up bad for me to write you off permanently, but some people have a one strike and you're out rule, which again seems ridiculous to me. 2. I think any WM who shows up here interested in cuckholding should be an automatic ban, and that should be in the site guidelines. I know that's not open-minded of me, but historically not one single one of those types has turned out to be anything but a useless waste of time. There are plenty of sites that cater to that fetish, they don't need to come to one that doesn't. 3. I think it would be beneficial to know who has you on ignore, that way you don't waste time typing a post to them that they aren't going to see anyway. That would save some people a whole lotta time. It would also save friends from having to point it out when you're being talked about because they know who you have on ignore and they feel duty bound to let you know... which is sweet BTW, but still it kinda defeats the purpose of ignore.
When I went to go get my mail, I found that I have jury duty. Want to go in my place? It seems too soon in my opinion. I did it maybe a couple years ago.
1. Agree completely. I left the cliques of high school a long, long time ago. I don't care to be in situations like that now that I'm a mature adult. My likes and dislikes are very fluid as well, as I think it should be. The people who hold grudges against someone for eternity are way too close-minded, immature, and narcissistic in my opinion. I enjoy interacting with open-minded, broad-viewed people. 2. I don't really have an opinion on the banning part, but I do agree that it's a waste of time for them to come here when there's plenty of other fish in the internet sea that will cater to their interests. 3. That's a good idea. I think it would be helpful to know!!
It's a ridiculous concept that I wish would go away. Unfortunately, it's just more proof that humans have to put a label on everyone and everything. I hate cliques. I think they're counterproductive to society as a whole. And the funny thing is, I can see through friends of friends on Facebook, that there are some men and women who are my age that are still very much into staying in their HS cliques. It's very sad, pathetic, and a little funny to see all at the same time.
I thought as a woman ages, men begin to lose interest in wanting her. That doesn't appear to be the case with me. I'm juggling 3 guys right now. I've never done this before in my life. I feel like a player. LOL. And the crappy part about all of this is that I'm horrible at making decisions, and I know I can't keep this up for long. ARGH!!
Yeah that's a false concept Bookie. I think actually it has to do with not wanting anyone. Seems the instant you decide you don't want to be involved with anyone, that you're happy all by your lonesome, fate has other plans and men start dropping from the sky. But personally I've found the most unexpected surprises are the absolute best.
I met a black woman with naturally blue eyes. Her daughter also inherited her eye color and I thought it was really interesting. She didn't appear to be of mixed race. She looked like a regular Af-American woman, except with blue eyes. Interesting.
[YOUTUBE]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wLXAFOw8wfg&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wLXAFOw8wfg&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>d[/YOUTUBE]
Yeah, that's how she looked ^. Although, her eyes weren't as light as that baby pictured. They were a bit darker.
I never really liked blue eyes on black people since it is a usual sign that a black person has gone blind.
so she was a dark black because a good sign that someone is mixed like in Michelle obama's case is they aren't dark black.
