People I would not screw with your di** / your pu**y

maybe I did and maybe you did also . The difference between you and I is that I will say yep i was wrong......

like you are wrong for misquoting me on the other site and this site and you could not just state oopps I was wrong. I made a bad statement. You cant do it because you want to save face. be mature and state you made a mistake. no one is going to slap the shit out of you.

you on the other hand went waaaay to the left on some sh** .

talking about why you (goodlove) hating on tat models and there only 2 tat models with face tats.

who gives a shit how many there are... they are out there right ? yes
I dont like em ...,. so WTF to argue about ?
would you date 200lb 5'5 women....? Possibly not . are you wrong for that ? according to britty you are stereotyping . according to your own words (2 of them) there are thousands of women that are 200lbs at 5'5 you should be knocking rite now.

 

also , never stereotyped tat models ... stereotyping would be they all are dumb or they all have stds .. thats stereotyping... I just stated I dont want to date them.

 

no where did i say all tat models have tats on their faces.

you are getting all worked up over nothing. get your facts str8 fox news correspondent.

 

Given your "aww hell naw"(which you said twice, as if we didn't get the point that you didn't like it the first post), I'll take it as trying to stir shit up. Yeah, you said it looked painful as crap, but with all your other recent shit talk, am I NOT supposed to take it as shit talking in that thread? Especially with other posts saying "uuuh nope. not for me", and "No". Seriously, was it necessary to say "awww hell naw" twice? Even if we get rid of the "awww hell naw", there are still the other comments.


We know you weren't gonna like most of the pics in there. You know that we know that, so there is no reason to go in the thread and give some bullshit negative response. 1 comment on 1 pic is fine, but you kept going, and it got annoying. You're ass didn't stop until AdventureSum called you out on it.


Also, how am I upset that I got a "tat or too"? I like my "tat.......or too"(The fuck?).

I got the idea that you don't like face tats days ago. It was the stereotyping issue, which Britty explained. The whole thrown under the bus thing missed me, as well. What the hell were you talking about? Nobody was saying anything to throw somebody else under the bus.

It seems like your ass is hella bitter, especially with that last paragraph. If the person who has the tat likes it, then don't trip over their choice.

Oh, and thanks for that Fox News comparison. Really clever and funny. *crickets* Good job on the assumption that some of us will get a snake tat, too. Stereotyping, first, now this shit. You seem to really have it out for people with tats.

 

"are you a tattoo model. you dont have tatts all over your face and all over your arms ? no so you are not a tat model."

Stereotype.


Since when does the word "all" have to be used to make it a stereotype. The tone implies it.


"Black people loves fried chicken and are loud". Is that not a stereotype? The word "all" doesn't change much of shit. The tone makes it sound like it applies to the general black population.

 

no sir no one has it out for tats. If you go out and look. I cosigned on a lot of tats. I stated and will state again I dont like an abundance of tats.

also as far as adventuresome. I did not even notice and dont even care like there is a limit on posting. who cares .

no one trashed someone over what they like. no one . not me . no one in this thread or last post.

then the snake tat..? boy do I have to explain that ? really do I have to explain that ? I guess I should because it went right over your head.

when people get a tat and then they age like 50 , 60 and 70 the person will wrinkle and it will start to look like something else. it dont have to be a snake ...it could be anything else. it could be a brad pitt pict then years on down the line it will start to look like larry king. Of course you dont understand that.

as far as fox new you will need to be up on your social events to understand that one .

 

where did i say tat models have face tats ? I named one model and stated that I dont want anyone with a face tat like her...( the one that dated sandra bullocks hubby). I never stated that I will not date tat models because they have face tats.

as far as tone ........ what ? dude you are backpeddling...no, you are doing a michael jackson move right now.

 

The fuck are you talking about? According to Britty(and me), you stereotyped. The example in bold quote here has nothing to do with stereotyping. If I don't want to date a 200 pound woman, that my preference. That's not a stereotype. It would be a stereotype if I added "all the do is eat sleep and will never exercise", then yes, that would be a stereotype. And according to my own words? Well according to my previous posts, I never brought up 200 pound women, so........according to what?



I'll admit when I am wrong. But I've got nothing to admit right now. Misquoting, my ass.

 

you misstated me on the awww hell naw statement.
you then stated well it was the tone you made.

in other words you are fucking up.

like i stated i would not date tat models because would have an excessive amt. other people disagree but they were cool with it because I stated " it is my preference"

your ass got all bent all out of shape. is one of your relative a tat modelling pole dancer or something... Im mean damn get over it. everyone has a preference but then for you it would be stereotyping.

 

The snake tat? No, you don't have to explain. I got it perfectly. No shit, it will look different as they start to age. Because I somehow don't understand that something as natural and inevitable as aging will affect the appearance of skin. And, no, it won't always look like something else. The skin is looser and wrinkled as people age, but I've seen plenty of old people with that's that are clear as hell. You make it sound like once you're old, the tat will be unrecognizable compared to when they first got it. It may look different, but not always a drastic change.

 

where did I stereotyped at

1. A conventional, formulaic, and oversimplified conception, opinion, or image.
2. One that is regarded as embodying or conforming to a set image or type.

fit the definition before you type :

 

now this is coming from a person who used the term "tone"
damn !

 

Did you not read your quote?

""are you a tattoo model. you dont have tatts all over your face and all over your arms ? no so you are not a tat model."


What exactly is there to "what?" about, regarding the tone? It's simple. The way to responded gives a a certain tone. TYPING IN CALL CAPS GIVES OFF A CERTAIN TONE!

 

Where did you stereotype?



Once again, here.


"are you a tattoo model. you dont have tatts all over your face and all over your arms ? no so you are not a tat model."

If somebody replaced some of the word to make them related to blacks, I'm sure you would take it as a stereotype. It's simple, you response gave of the idea that you think tat models, in general, have face tats. Hell, there's a bunch of tat models that don't have arm tats.

 

I will not fuck

1.Major drug users
2.Too many tatoos
3.Simple person.
4.Xenophobe
5.A person who has loads of piercings.
6.Obese person.

 

Not that I do women but one person could sum it up for me about things that would be wrong with someone, that would make me not want to do it........dirty, look like they smell, use drugs, drink too much alcohol, foul mouth, look like they have VD...........like her :

 

What ya talking bout willis, she sexy as hell! LoL

I will shag the ugliest tattoed up the ass drug junkie mofo who is wlling to shag me at the dark alley of Santa monica boulevard in broad day light.

 

Shit you just reminded me..........one more thing. Bad/nasty teeth.

 

Agreed Jordan, she just looks nasty.

 

Id hit it.....but then again...i got no shame in my game