Mother and son arrested for......incest

Discussion in 'In the News' started by goodlove8, Sep 18, 2016.

  1. goodlove8

    goodlove8 Active Member

  2. MilkandCoffee

    MilkandCoffee Well-Known Member

    Sometimes you gotta revisit your old apartment just for the nostalgia

    (I'm joking around)
     
  3. Bliss

    Bliss Well-Known Member

    GL l don't even want to click the link...l'm so disgusted already.

    All l can think is... now imagine the even worse horror if one party was not a party to it...that is what we call family sexual abuse, which happens A LOT, so your header is actually rampant under a different name. We have just become immune to it because we see/read/hear it so often.
     
  4. goodlove8

    goodlove8 Active Member

    So if somone calls him a "motherfucker " then he can't get mad.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2016
  5. Paniro187

    Paniro187 Restricted

    As nasty as this is why are charges filed if this is two consenting adults.
     
  6. goodlove8

    goodlove8 Active Member

    The law
     
  7. Paniro187

    Paniro187 Restricted

    Which is a fucked up law.
     
  8. goodlove8

    goodlove8 Active Member

    Why
     
  9. Paniro187

    Paniro187 Restricted

    Two consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want. I don't agree with it at all. what I feel is sexually amoral they might be ok with. So basically, it's none of the laws business who is fucking who.


    That's my opinion I feel I have explained it enough. I'm done with this sick shit.
     
  10. goodlove8

    goodlove8 Active Member

    It's nasty....I agree with the law.if a child is born from that they will be all fouled up
     
  11. archangel

    archangel Well-Known Member

    They might have children that may have defects and it greatly increases this risk. Generally, when a man and a woman get together they usually have kids. Though, I know I don't have to tell some of you.

    The kid will bear the brunt of the problems.
     
  12. Paniro187

    Paniro187 Restricted

    So what if they don't have kids? Will you still want to ignore their rights?
     
  13. archangel

    archangel Well-Known Member

    If they don't have kids in this hypothertical world of yours, then yes I agree.

    In the real world, sex is to make people. Humanity has found a way around it but it is not 100% secure. It is unlikely that all of the relationships will not have a child.
     
  14. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    Agreed. Even the possibility of being with a third cousin and not knowing it fucked with me a little. Women in my home town were never taken seriously.
     
  15. goodlove8

    goodlove8 Active Member

    Yeah I agree
     
  16. Bliss

    Bliss Well-Known Member

    What's interesting is how in the past, first and second cousins often married to keep blood lines going. Especially in Royal circles and l think in Ancient Egypt..would have to look it up.
     
  17. RaiderLL

    RaiderLL Well-Known Member

    I cannot believe I actually agree with Paniro :confused: The issue of them possibly creating children together and their risk for disabilities in those children is truly irrelevant. Disabled children are born every day to non-related parents. Majority of people don't get screened to determine their potential for passing on generic abnormalities prior to reproducing anyways. Even couples who lose a pregnancy/child and through subsequent genetic testing realize there's significant risk to future pregnancies, still have the right to continue trying to have a child, disabled or not.

    I personally don't agree with this couples relationship, but it's NOBODY'S business, imo, what two consenting adults do.
     
  18. archangel

    archangel Well-Known Member

    Trying to reduce the chances of it happening... not increase it. With so many people on the planet, you could certainly pick someone who doesn't increase the chance.


    They recently had a mother and daughter doing it. Fine with me.

    If they were pretty, I'd ask to join. No I'm totally kidding

    .... No I'm not:smile:
     
  19. APPIAH

    APPIAH Well-Known Member

    Animals commit incest. Enough said.:cool:
     
  20. RaiderLL

    RaiderLL Well-Known Member

    Lol you're a dork :)

    I get your point about trying to decrease the chance of disabilities but in all actuality, there are couples (non related) who knowingly take similar risks with the health of their child. Women are having children much later in life nowadays, increasing the chances of fetal abnormalities. Should they not be permitted to reproduce because of the known increased risk? Or maybe women >35 just shouldnt be permitted to marry since we know "most couples have kids" and we wouldn't want to risk it?

    I hear your point, but it's just as silly as the other examples I just detailed. Ultimately I think it comes down to people trying to force others to live by the morals that guide their own lives. No different than those who fight to keep women from having abortions or keep gay people from marrying, etc.
     

Share This Page