First off I have nothing against Micheal Jackson, I have been a fan of his music for years. My issue is how much self-hatred Micheal Jackson has of himself that he could not use his own sperm to make HIS children. [YOUTUBE]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Z2PeJpw_4c&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Z2PeJpw_4c&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]
Well I am not so perfectly sure, but I wondered even before he had those kids, if he would ever be able to have his own kids, since his voice stayed hmmm kind of boyish....
People need to stop saying he hated himself, it's boring. You don't know the actual story. Whether they're genetically his kids or not he was legally the father so it doesn't really matter and the main point is that he loved them. I find it pretty sad that the media is plastering everywhere that they're not his kids, they're only like ten, they shouldn't have to deal with that. Poor kids.
To be honest, i have no idea if those are Michael's biological children, but one thing i do know is the fact that the kids' appearance should have no bearing on whether or not people believe he is the father. My nephew, who is almost 2 years old now (born from a white father and black mother) looks NOTHING like a black child, or even a mixed child. He could EASILY pass for white when he grows up. I find it so interesting because he doesn't look like either one of his parents. The same could be true for these children, but nobody will really know anything until they finally get some DNA tests done.
I totally agree with this 100%. All that matters is the fact that he took care of them/raised them. Any other point is moot.
okay, i have to say this....i have NEVER thought that they were his kids....could there be possibility? YES, coz genetics plays lots of tricks. I like his music and his charity efforts, but come ON!!!!!! the kids look white to me. But folks, enough about MJ being a self hater. I don't want to open up a big can of worms here, but there are quite a few blks who indulge with self hate and self loathing; whether you like it or not this is due to the legacy of american slavery. Anways, let's leave the guy alone. He is dead ok, and did not seem to be happy when he lived. He is a prime example of that money can't buy you happiness. I'm going to just conclude with this, Michael Jackson is dead and his personal life isn't any of our business or concern. Let's pray for his soul and move on.
Very good post. Well said at the end, as well. I just hope that his children can find peace and will have the best possible person/people raising them, so they can grow up happy.
I and many others had mentioned it many times that those kids are not his. As recently as a week or two ago in another thread. Since he is gone his mom will be taking care of them.
Yes the legend is dead, may he rest in peace. Unfortunately, with that death certain things that Mr. Jackson may have hidden when he was alive tend to come to the surface. It will be interesting in the next few weeks what will come up.
Why do you care what comes to light? Not really sure how that's anyone's business. People are so nosey nowadays. Damn, he's not even in the ground yet, why can't people let his children grieve for their father in peace? Of course people will start saying shit now that he cannot defend himself.
Good point.He can't say anything anymore.He was the father figure in those kids' lives whether he was their biological father or not. There were never any shady news about the way he treated them in the news.So just let let him get his piece now and the kids grieve and have a childhood without people left and right making comments,ask stuff,....
Debbie Rowe's dad confirmed some years ago that Michael was not the biological father of the two oldest children. Now there are rumors that she was a surrogate herself. I hope she's allowed to see the children once things settle down.
yep the youngest. If I understand right it's about the 2 oldest though.I mean the paternity issue. I have never heard any scandal about him with those 2 kids
True....but they were forced to wear veils in public. I'm just playing Devil's Advocate. Don't mind me. ;-) I really think the issue is what everyone else is saying: it's the kids' welfares that need to be worried about now. And that's for the family to worry about, not the public. No matter what happened in the past, the future lies in finding a suitable person/people to raise the children he left behind. :smt023
Them wearing masks was per Debbie Rowe's request that their children not be photographed. She admitted that in a interview several years ago. I don't blame them for making the children wear masks, the paps are out of control. Its a good idea, so they cant make any money off of the childrens pictures. Anywho, I digress, I believe MJ could be the childrens bio father. I don't know if anyone is familar with Quincy Jones daughter Rashida Jones, but she looks exactly like MJ's childrens and she is half black and half white. Anything is possible is all I'm saying, genetics is not so cut and dry all the time. Regardless, he was the only father they have known and he took good care of them. I'm sure Katherine Jackson will take good care of the children now. MJ requested that she take care of them in his will, so the courts should honor his request.