He claims "the genocide of the white race" that pornography is causing. And people wanna persecute Sen. Obama and Rev. Wright :roll: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353536,00.html The Indiana Congressional Candidate the GOP Wishes Would Go Away On the face of it, Tony Zirkle looks like the perfect candidate for Congress: He attended the Naval Academy, he has a degree from Georgetown, and he went on to be a top prosecutor in Indiana, crusading against Internet pornography. There’s only one problem — or maybe more than one, as far as the Indiana Republican Party is concerned. Zirkle, who is seeking the GOP nomination for the state’s 2nd Congressional District, believes — among other things — that whites are victims of a "genocide," that the races should be segregated into different states and that pornography is a Jewish plot against women. "We’d love for him to disappear — not for the sake of our party but for his own sake," said Jay Kenworthy, communications director for the Indiana GOP. On top of all that, Zirkle accepted an invitation to address a group of swastika-wearing, Sieg-Heiling Nazi party members at a celebration of what would have been Adolf Hitler’s 119th birthday on April 20 in Chicago — birthday cake and all. The personal-injury lawyer says he’s running for Congress to combat "the genocide of the white race" that pornography is causing — an "unholy pornocaust" against white Christian women. "We now have a small army of male black porn stars that are sifting through five, ten, fifteen thousand women," he said. "One man can now genocide the wombs of thousands of women," infecting them with sexually transmitted diseases that leave them barren. He calls it "Porn mule womb slaughter . . . the most effective weapon of mass destruction." In an interview, Zirkle told FOXNews.com he doesn't think he is too far out of the Republican mainstream. He believes the solution to STDs and out-of-wedlock births is to separate blacks and whites into segregated states, but he says that's fully in the tradition of the party. "The original Republican party" felt the same way, he said. "Abraham Lincoln called for African-Americans to be deported back to Africa." Not unpredictably, the Republican Party wants nothing to do with him. "We don’t consider him a member of the party," Kenworthy said. "His views are not in any way, shape or form a reflection of the Republican party’s views." But Zirkle captured 30 percent of the Republican primary vote in 2006, when he ran against an incumbent who went on to lose to a Democrat (Joe Donnelly) in November. With three candidates but no incumbent in Tuesday's Republican primary, some wonder if Zirkle will perform better this time around. Zirkle, said he "just spoke off the top of [his] head" at the Nazi gathering, where he addressed the crowd in front of a giant portrait of Hitler. He insisted he had no prior connections to the group and that he’s not a member of the Nazi party. "What most people don’t know about me is that I’m the father of three beautiful Jewish Christian children," he said, explaining that his wife had converted from Judaism to Christianity. "I’m obviously not going to be out for gassing innocent Jews." Yet he blames Jews for much of the plight of white women in America. "The massive number of Jews in the [pornography] industry basically brag about it," he said, asserting that "most of the early porn stars were Jewish men." Zirkle said he doesn’t expect to win on Tuesday, but "winning is not my primary objective. My primary objective is to educate and inform." For its part, the Republican party has officially endorsed Luke Puckett, the owner of a small business who is running against Zirkle. "We fully expect Luke Puckett to win with an incredible majority," Kenworthy said. "We think the rest of District 2 would be loath to vote for [Zirkle]. We don’t expect it to be close."
This dude sounds like a serious wingnut. I wonder what his secret black mistress thinks about all this.
Re: Indiana Congressional Candidate wants to outlaw IR datin Well i certainly give him an A+ on that. Most Republicans think like he does, thus explaining his 30% of the vote.
But if "most" Republicans thought like him, he'd have more than 30% of the vote, yeah? Not that I'm taking Republicans off the hook :lol:
Hardly what most republicans think and certainly not what most americans think, as 77% of Americans believe that IR relationships are ok.
His shtick is coming from a white nationalist viewpoint. They believe in separation of all races or at least whites. I seriously doubt that pornography really has anything to do with anything other than the fact that seeing interracial porn bothers him. Notice that he didn't speak about WHITE men in porn...
typical... for all my time spent in Gary, I never really got to see much of the rest of Indiana on any recurring basis.. and I'm actually glad for it... :roll: the KKK had real official legislative control on the state decades ago, and despite the removal of sheets I'm sure there are plenty who long for the old days..
Not necessarily. The Republican party is like any other major party in this country. Their ultimate goal is to win votes and attain power. And lets face it. They can't very well do that if they reveal publicly what the small majority of them think. And if you don't believe that, just watch Fox news. 30% is still alot.
This dude is clearly an ignorant racists to say the least. Segregation is not the answer. It never has been. It never will be. Not to mention he claims to be Christian hanging at a Nazi party telling ideas of preserving the white race by segregating them from other races. Very regressive, non-Christian, ignorant thinking on his part.
And of course it doesn't get the national attention Rev. Wright is getting. If you ask me, they all secretly wants a ban on Interracial couples. Anyone ever notice when bad news against IR comes up, it doesn't get much attention.
Yeah...that's what I was thinking. How many people will readily admit that they are against "race-mixing"....as we've seen in the Democratic primary race...people often don't state their prejudices. You'd have to assume that the 23% against IR represents the more vocal end of those against IR....of the 77% that accept it...you have to wonder if they are accepting of all IR or just certain pairings....i.e., white & Asian, black & Latino etc.