AMEN!!! That's one freakin' thing I can't stand about actors and actresses in Hollywood. Sure, there's poor decision-making when it comes to certain scripts I'd imagine, but why be miss goody when you actually have to take on a role which requires showing some skin or involves some sexual contact??? Make up ya'll damn minds in H-town. It's either art or it's not. I'm actually admitting that I'm pathetic because in order for me to see any skin in a flick anymore, I'd have to watch something pre-1990 now. Just another one of these stupid influence rules that Hollywood has now and it's infected the actors as well. And Miss Alba (Miss Thang) pisses me off the most. This one has been given the damn red carpet treatment ever since she arrived. If it's not been Maxim magazine or any of the many lightweight skin publications, it's James Cameron handing her "Dark Angel." Or putting her in "Honey," failing miserably as an ethnic around-the-way girl. Or even making her the object of all those horny comic book boys by placing her in the Fantastic Four movies. Ridiculous. I mean, if nudity hurt her career that's one thing. But she shouldn't presume some type of conservatism now that she's already sold her soul as every red-blooded american boy's hot girlfriend. Please. Art should be art. If the script is sound and it makes you think and the acting is great, nudity shouldn't be threatening. But yeah, broad comes off thinking she's better than Cleopatra or something.:smt012
Yep perfect example are "Lakeview terrace".The 2 protagonists.Black lady and white guy are serious,moving in together,talking about kids.. Then you got "Obsessed" and the white girl there is displayed as obsessed(like the movie title says) with the black guy in a more sexual way. I don't like that bm/ww attraction is often portrayed as mainly lustful or like a sexual fetish in movies. In reality that may be the case for some but not as many as hollywood tries to show.