Wait, do you ask women for their MBTI when you meet them??? (BTW, that could be a new thread „What’s your MBTI?“)
No. I can pick up on it rather easily. Usually within the first 30 min for extroverts. Sometimes it's harder to pick up on it with introverts, but I'll pick up on it by the end of 1 day at the longest.
I prefer my women with an NF NT: is cool as I am one SP: usually only fwb, but I keep my mind open too more SJ: nope never
I just wanted to add, please continue to take care of yourself for you. They'll "unintentionally" point you in an early grave if you aren't careful.
I disagree. It's something that's real and most can't see it, but I know plenty others that do. When your conscience is on a higher frequency you pick up on things others don't.
https://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28315137 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...lity-test-is-pretty-much-meaningless-9359770/ Regardless, I can't stop people from believing in fairies or gods, so, believe what you want. I wish you the best.
I'll check it out. BTW it's not a belief unless you think psychology is fake and that Carl Jung was a whack job. Irrespective of that. I know what I have perceived for myself.
These articles are about debunking the test, no? I haven't looked at that test in well over a decade nor do I put stock into it, as I mentioned before, I don't need a test to type people. Just because that test may have major short commings doesn't mean the 4 categories of temperament doesn't exist. Actually if I was going to direct someone to a test or website about it I would direct them to David Kerseys temperament website. Although I haven't been to that site for years myself.
Those articles are about debunking a test. Just because a reliable test may not have been found doesn't mean the subject matter is false.
If you follow that link you'll see that I actually disagreed with someone's test results. That was back in 2014 ish.
Watch the final video if you must. The test has been debunked and the individual identifiers are debunked along with it. It is a very old theory with many criticism that doesn't hold up today. But, as I said, believe in what you will and I will respect your beliefs.
Carl Jung didn't develop the Meyers Briggs. So what test are you talking about? Maybe I would think it was false if I have never perceived it myself. I don't even know how someone would prove it. Don't really care honestly.