Harvard Law Women Says Blacks Are Less Intelligent

No dummy actually saying you're an athiest is the definition of ruling out the possibility of a God and for anyone who thinks with any type of reason would understand that phenotype has no baring on intelligence. That's like saying being taller makes you a better cook its aridiculous notion. Did you get your degree off the back of a cracker jack box?

 

Not surprsed by this at all... This person identifies more with a Brazilain NAZI than a Black foreigner.

Complete ass-kissing BM or a loser pretending to be Black.

 

Hell no....He got his degree from a cracker's ass..:butthead:

 

Yep, if you haven't completely ruled out the possibility, then you are agnostic rather than atheist. GMTA Andrae.

 

Gmta?

 

Flame I enjoy a lot of your post and we often agree but you gotta chill with the racist remarks especially on a site dedicated to interracial relationships.

 

Great Minds Think Alike

 

Amen baby girl

 

Incorrect,the broadest definition of "atheist" is someone who has absolutely no belif in any form of deity, it's not just someone who REJECTS this possibility, at least that's the dictionary definition, you don't have to outright reject the idea in order to be an atheist, there is a difference between not believing and rejecting.

 

Also, it depends on what you call "God", I use the word "God' in a vague sense, like, the force that created the universe, I don't know what's behind it, so how can I reject it if I don't even know what it is?.

 

Saying you have no belief in something is in fact rejecting it IMO. You've considered the question, and formed a conclusion, hence you've rejected the opposing theory. If you haven't rejected one of the theories, then you are undecided and you indicated that's not the case. Regardless, it's well known and accepted that the distinction between an atheist and an agnostic is that an atheist doesn't believe there's a God, and an agnostic just isn't sure. My father was agnostic, I know the difference.

 

Again that's an agnostic POV empyrium. And the general term used for both atheist and agnostic is 'deity' not God.

 

How do you know that, there are certain groups or races that are more prone to certain types of diseases, black people usually have weaker eyes, and stronger voices, are you going to tell me biology has nothing to do with that? , so what I'm saying is that it's ridiculous to rule out this possibility, even though it sounds absurd, it can't be ruled out until someone proves it false, and it's not even a theory, there isn't much to be disproved, genetics certainly has to do with intelligence, some families are indeed smarter than others, we just don't know if race has something to do with that. PERSONALLY I don't believe race is really a factor as blacks function in the same way as whites do and there haven't been found any considerable differences between the black and the white brain, so biologically there is no basis for the belief that blacks are less intelligent, but like I said, we can't rule out anything.

 

The dictionary definition of atheist is someone who denies the existence of God so that means you do actually reject the idea of God. Have enough integrity to say you made a mistake and move on but don't try to lamely defend a position when you're obviously wrong. Its insulting to our intelligence.

 

That's not the definition I know, the difinition I know is that atheism is the disbelief in OR denial of the existence of God, these are not the same thing.

 

I disagree, having no belief in something is not the same as denying its existence.

 

Okay WTF man?

 

From wikipedia (but there is a source lol)

According to atheist Richard Dawkins, a distinction between agnosticism and atheism is unwieldy and depends on how close to zero we are willing to rate the existence of any given god-like entity. Since in practice it is not worth contrasting a zero probability with a probability that is nearly indistinguishable from zero, he prefers to categorize himself as a "de facto atheist".

 

I'm trying really hard not to lose my cool. I want to believe you aren't race baiting with these douche bag comments but as always I'm going to use logic.
1. Certain diseases attributed to a certain people has more to with geography than actual race
2. Merely bringing up that assertion to defend your ridiculous claim that you believe certain genes makes one inferior. Btw I don't think blacks always have better voices I believe it has more to do with cultural disposition.
3. Again your bs point about certain families being smarter is non sense. If that were true then the wealthy would have a monoply on genius and you would only hear about genius amongst the wealthiest of families.

 

Well good for him. Sounds like a man who can't make a decision to me.