Child sex abuse within families rampant http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/child-sex-abuse-within-families-rampant-20140912-10fxao.html Victoria Police wants to open a new front in the fight against family violence as frightening new data reveals a 43 per cent jump in child sex abuse cases in the past five years. Detective Superintendent Rod Jouning, head of the Victoria Police sexual and family violence division, said the true rate of child sex abuse by family members and others known to the victim was horrifying. He said Victoria Police's campaign to tackle family violence had encouraged unprecedented reporting of partner on partner violence, but too many child sex abuse victims were still not coming forward. "We haven't even scratched the surface," he said. "We never liked talking about family violence, because it happened behind closed doors. "Here's something else happening behind closed doors, and we've got to talk about it." The new data, obtained exclusively by The Saturday Age, show that children were the victims in almost three-quarters of sex assault cases and a third of rape cases in Victoria last year. Girls aged 10 to 14 are the most likely to be abused. Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/c...es-rampant-20140912-10fxao.html#ixzz3DKRZognD Senior police fear the rate of child sexual abuse will match the family violence crisis – which has largely focused on abusive relationships between adults. The crime statistics reveal large increases in offences against children under 10, and sexual assaults by parents. Other revelations uncovered during interviews with police and support services include: - More children in primary schools – some as young as five – are being counselled after instigating troubling sexualised behaviour against fellow students; - Increases in men approaching youths online, pretending to be their age and getting them to exchange explicit images, before extorting them for sex; and - Men committing sexual offences against girls after arranged marriages. Detective Superintendent Jouning said a community fear of "stranger danger" attacks clouded the fact children were far more often abused by family members or people known to them. The focus on institutional child sexual assault, including the royal commission, and media attention on infrequent cases involving teachers, community leaders or celebrities also obscured the true picture of offending, he said. Detective Superintendent Jouning said being sexually assaulted by a family member was no different to someone being abused by a teacher, priest or scout leader. "In fact it's probably worse." A woman who was abused by her father, mother, and a worker on their farm has spoken publicly for the first time about her ordeal, to urge others to come forward and stop living with their secrets. "Kate" fears her father may have abused or allowed the abuse of 10 children between the 1960s and 1990s before he took his own life while facing charges. She approached police three times before they believed she had been abused, but said her ordeal was worth it because she had been able to break free of the control her abusers had over her. "I've had some silly people say 'Oh just forget about it'," she said. "You're not talking about it for nothing, you're talking about it because it's haunting you, and you need to do something. "I thought that I must feel guilty, and that's why I shook when I went to the police station, but it wasn't guilt, it was intimidation." The state government will next week unveil the Dandenong multi-disciplinary centre to tackle sex abuse, which will combine police, Department of Human Services, Centre Against Sexual Assault and Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine staff in the same building for the first time. The Dandenong centre will be the largest in Victoria and the only site with a VIFM presence. Three centres are already operating with three more expected to open in the next 12 months. While the centres are expected to greatly improve the response to victims they also drive huge increases in reporting. At the Barwon centre, which opened in 2012, DHS, CASA and police staff said they had all noticed an increase in reporting. DHS team manager Catherine Porter said more victims were coming through the door because the centre was less intimidating than some DHS offices and police stations. Barwon CASA counselling and support services coordinator John Blomfield said he was sure the rate of recidivism among sex offenders was higher than reported. He said an increase in reporting would bring more offenders before police, and paint a clearer picture of their prospects of rehabilitation. "Where do they go or what do they do?," Mr Blomfield said. "It's nice to think they don't go on and reoffend, but you'd have to convince me." Detective Superintendent Jouning said he was concerned that an increase in sex offending could also be driven by the accessibility of more "deviant" pornography, such as rape, bestiality, incest and child exploitation material. He said this material could blur the lines of consent. "Unless there's screaming and they're yelling 'no', they're not enjoying it. You get that kind of warped thinking. "It becomes normalised." Centre Against Sexual Assault 24-hour crisis line: 1800 806 292 Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/c...es-rampant-20140912-10fxao.html#ixzz3DKRqlLpn
This is a very important issue that needs addressed immediately. The effects of child sex abuse is devastating and the wounds never heal. I know it's a very uncomfortable subject to speak of but please tell your little ones that it's not ok for anyone ever to touch them. If it's happening, it's not their fault and it's ok to tell. The perpetrator is manipulator and they do not love you one bit. He's not going to hurt your family and you won't get in trouble. You fully believe them and they have 100% of your support. Even if life seems perfect, randomly let them know, a lot of victims look perfectly happy on the inside but are screaming for help inside.
All it takes is a couple of seconds to forever rob a child of there innocence. People are afraid of the danger outside of home for there children when the danger is just as bad inside. Biological fathers who were perpetrators: 50% were charged with neglect only, 26% were charged with physical abuse only, 7% were charged with emotional abuse only, 7% were charged with sexual abuse only, and 11% were charged with some combination of the above. Mother’s boyfriends who were perpetrators: 31% were charged with neglect only. 30% were charged with physical abuse only. 20% were charged with sexual abuse only. 6% were charged with emotional abuse only. And 13% were charged with some combination of the above. Stepfathers who were perpetrators: 34% were charged with physical abuse only. 30% were charged with sexual abuse only. 20% were charged with neglect only. 4% were charged with emotional abuse only. And 12% were charged with some combination of the above. Combination fathers who were perpetrators: 56% were charged with neglect only, 8% were charged with physical abuse only, 7% were charged with sexual abuse only, 3% were charged with emotional abuse only, and 25% were charged with some combination of the above. Adoptive fathers who were perpetrators: 33% were charged with physical abuse only, 24% were charged with sexual abuse only, 23% were charged with neglect only, 3% were charged with emotional abuse only, and 17% were charged with some combination of the above. - See more at: http://www.jennyraearmstrong.com/20...-probably-stay-that-way/#sthash.odCKmJoR.dpuf Stay vigilant my friends.
Feds: NYC cop plotted with woman to molest her baby — and they recorded it all on Sky Feds: NYC cop plotted with woman to molest her baby — and they recorded it all on Skype York City police officer and a woman from Colorado were indicted this week for conspiring online to molest her 1-year-old child. Sgt. Alberto Randazzo was arrested last year on charges of using a child in a s3xual performance, promoting s3xual performance by a child and possessing a s3xual performance by a child. But new court documents obtained by the New York Daily News describe in detail the shocking 2010 Skype video chats where Keira Norton carries out the s3x acts as Randazzo instructs her. At least 11 Skype video files were recovered by investigators. It was not clear why the woman agreed to molest her child, according to the Daily News. Both Randazzo and Norton face up to 15 years in jail if convicted http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/...t-her-baby-and-they-recorded-it-all-on-skype/
Lena Dunham Describes Opening Her 1 Yr Old Sisters Vagina & Masterbating In Front Her In her newly published collection of personal essays, Not That Kind of Girl, Lena Dunham describes experimenting sexually with her younger sister Grace, whom she says she attempted to persuade to kiss her using “anything a sexual predator might do.” In one particularly unsettling passage, Dunham experimented with her six-year younger sister’s vagina. “This was within the spectrum of things I did,” she writes. In the collection of nonfiction personal accounts, Dunham describes using her little sister at times essentially as a sexual outlet, bribing her to kiss her for prolonged periods and even masturbating while she is in the bed beside her. But perhaps the most disturbing is an account she proudly gives of an episode that occurred when she was seven and her sister was one. Here’s the full passage (p. 158-9): “Do we all have uteruses?” I asked my mother when I was seven. “Yes,” she told me. “We’re born with them, and with all our eggs, but they start out very small. And they aren’t ready to make babies until we’re older.” I look at my sister, now a slim, tough one-year-old, and at her tiny belly. I imagined her eggs inside her, like the sack of spider eggs in Charlotte’s Webb, and her uterus, the size of a thimble. “Does her vagina look like mine?” “I guess so,” my mother said. “Just smaller.” One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist and when I saw what was inside I shrieked. My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!” My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things I did. She just on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been a success. Dunham writes of casually masturbating while in bed next to her younger sister, of bribing her with “three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds . . . anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying.” Dunham describes the book as a “work of nonfiction” in which “some names and identifying details have been changed.” She also states that she considers herself an “unreliable narrator,” which gives her some wiggle room on the truth of her accounts. AsNational Review's Kevin D. Williamson notes, this passage is “especially suspicious.” Clearly Grace’s prank is done with the expectation of her older sister “poking around in her genitals. … There is no non-horrific interpretation of this episode.”
Mom held down daughter while she was being raped Authorities arrested Columbus woman and partner Alberto Hernandez after they say the child escaped from her home and alerted neighbors. Child now safely with father, news station reports. A little girl’s brave escape to her neighbors’ home ended in the arrest of her mother and her mother’s boyfriend for alleged rape. Authorities hauled the Columbus, Ohio, woman, whose name is being withheld to protect her 8-year-old daughter’s identity, and her boyfriend Alberto Hernandez before a judge for an arraignment hearing Monday, local TV channel WSYX ABC 6 reported. The mother of the girl from the North Linden neighborhood allegedly restrained her own daughter as her partner raped her on repeated occasions, Franklin County prosecutors said. The child fled from her mother’s house over the weekend, said one of the family’s neighbors, whose name the station also protected. “I guess he tried to rape the 8-year-old, and the little girl had enough strength to get up and get out of there,” the witness told the TV station. The judge set the mother’s bail at $1 million and Hernandez’s at $2 million. Authorities returned the girl to her father. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ing-boyfriend-rape-daughter-article-1.2109196
5 Things I Learned Infiltrating Deep Web Child Molesters http://www.cracked.com/personal-exp...infiltrating-deep-web-child-molesters_p1.html #5. In The Dark Web, You'll Find A Whole Pedophile "Community" To infiltrate this stygian pit of awfulness, Pam used the same anonymizing service revered by drug dealers and privacy advocates: Tor. If you don't pay much attention to Internet-news, Tor is a free service you can use to try and thwart government surveillance of your online communication -- basically wiping away your tracks. Ironically, Tor was developed with a lot of government help and is currently used by the military, NSA, and CIA for their own stealth-browsing needs. Like so many times before, the government engineered the means for its own defeat. Sadly, not an Onion gag-site. Once you're in you go searching for the illegal stuff the same way the pedophiles do -- they have set up a system to make it easier for them to find each other. So, while they don't like to advertise, child pornographers do have their own Wikipedia, which is accessible through Tor. It's named "Hard Candy," because there is no God and whatever odious being vomited us into existence abandoned us to the void long ago. The first link is to "The Pedophile's Handbook." We're warning you to turn back now. Pam eventually wound up at a discussion forum called 3DBoys, which is full of erotic art and stories about every nightmare your parents ever had while you were growing up. "Good riddance." -- the real world. However, there wasn't any actual porn on 3DBoys. Everything there was on the edge, certainly, but members were extremely careful never to blindly masturbate their way into outright illegality. However, during her exploration of 3DBoys, Pam learned of a site called 7axxn, which was essentially the Mos Eisley Cantina for child pornographers. Since basically everyone on 7axxn was guilty of more federal crimes than your average Batman villain, membership was heavily restricted. Like that creepy rich people sex club from Eyes Wide Shut, the only way in to 7axxn was to get an invitation from a current member. Some of those members hung out in a less-restricted Tor chatroom, but it looked like gaining their trust would require breaking the law: "If you didn't provide a link to child porn every 10 minutes, you were kicked off," says Pam. This whole "incriminate yourself to get inside" attitude was common among pedophiles of the Deep Web: "There are a lot of forums that don't even allow new members unless they submit an application where they upload examples from their own CP library. I wasn't about to even try that." Reminder: This is a $20,000,000,000 industry. It's sort of like how drug dealers in the movies will force suspected undercover cops to do a line of what is supposedly cocaine in order to prove their shared criminality -- the big difference being that it's totally legal for cops to do that kind of stuff in the interest of busting criminals. Pam wasn't a cop, so, if she downloaded or exchanged any illegal pornography, she would be in just as much trouble as the band of villains she was attempting to infiltrate. Finally, she got lucky. "The third day someone said, 'Oh yeah, I've got an invite,' and I was like, 'Can I have an invite, too?'" Thanks to the, uh, generosity of that particular pedophile, Pam was in. And the further in she got, the more terrifying the implications of her research became. As Nietzsche said, "She who fights with monsters should look to it that she herself doesn't get raided by the FBI for her browser history." Which is to say, the legal status of Pam's work was rather murky. "Researchers do have some legal protections in these situations, but my primary adviser was fuzzy about whether I was even eligible as an undergrad. This started six months of paranoia that every time the doorbell rang, it was the FBI coming to get me for my data. Sometimes, I still jump [when I hear it]." But, the FBI never came, and, over the course of the next month, Pam observed what we can safely call the Internet's worst community, where she learned ...
#4. There Are Two Opposing "Camps" Of Child Molester There's something we should establish right away. There are pedophiles out there who desperately don't want to harm children and hate the urges they feel -- we interviewed a few of them a while back. But, what Pam found on 7axxn was a shytload of people dedicated to raping and victimizing children and also finding new ways to do it. 7axxn is a community of "over 90,000" registered users, filled with gigabyte after gigabyte of child pornography, which is easily the most depressing set of statistics ever recorded. Most users are just there for the porn, but hundreds of them also contribute to a lively set of discussion forums. There are even polls, breaking down the popularity of things such as "Hurtcore," which is the charming shorthand term for pornography featuring the violent physical abuse of children (Note: About 40 percent of respondents said they "love it!, and another 19 percent merely thought it was "okay, not my favorite.") We take it back. This is the most disturbing set of statistics ever recorded. Other highlights of the discussion included a debate over the merits of drugging children, in which one member insisted that drugs weren't necessary because " ... children are quite heavy sleepers without taking any medication at all!" Those awful "practical" threads actually revealed a major divide within the "community," between people who were more-or-less at peace with the fact that they were sexually assaulting victims who were incapable of giving consent, to those who considered themselves child lovers, insisting they were merely in a mutual sexual relationship with someone who happened to be a kindergartner. Here's a sample post from a thread asking whether or not respondents preferred "real sex or real rape." Quote: "Enjoy what you want; that's your business, NOT MINE. But don't you DARE, EVER paint me with the same brush as you do yourself. And don't ever call yourself a child lover, either. You've got some nerve. Do you also think that stealing something is the same as buying it, too? Well, if that's the case, I hope you open a shop in my village soon. Of course, I myself would never steal anything from you. The only people you'd have to worry about is people just like yourself. What a way to go through life: having no desire to ever look in a mirror and see someone you could possibly respect." Note their signature: "Young lady, the solution to all your problems is right here in my pants." Pam got her first hints of the divide between "child lovers" and "child molesters" when she was browsing around the 3DBoys community, seeing posts like this: "Hi thestruggle, [smiley face] You have to learn to disassociate your thinking of pedophilia with hurting or abusing children. You have been brought up to, not talk to strangers etc when you was a child because your parents who think pedos hurt children passed that idea on to you & now your mind is confused ... The truth is, some people do hurt children but the majority of pedophiles (paedophile is latin for child lover -- paed=child & phile=love) love children and would not hurt them or harm them in any way." His or her username was "pdiatric." Sweet Jesus, please don't let him or her be a pediatrician. We've actually encountered this ourselves, by the way. After we did the aforementioned article with the pedophiles who were trying to undergo treatment to stop, some lovely soul tweeted to us an earnest defense of child molestation based around two key points of indestructible logic: A) Children have sex with each other! And ... B) Pedophilia means "child friend." No, really! So, which is it, "friend" or "lover"? We're starting to think these people suck at Latin. You'll note the same "linguistic root of the word 'pedophile'" talking point Pam ran into above. They also claimed that our article's point of view represented, "... the breeder/prude/cretin's agenda treating kids as property without a will or say of their own." As if the children's "innocence" (that is, the fact that they don't know what's happening and are easily lied to) isn't the very thing that turns them on. In other words, there are child molestation crusaders out there, and Pam ran into a lot of this on the Deep Web. Below is one response to a 7axxn post from a guy, bemoaning his inability to be anything but a "leech" (a person who consumes the content but never submits any) because his family situation made it impossible to actively share child pornography. The other members suggested he could aid "the cause" by helping to "enlighten & educate" the children in his life on the "true philosophies of love": "Firstly, there is nothing wrong with being a "leech" for on topic IMHO. It is important we spread the content for all who share our orientation. But it is equally important that we make the world see that so called 'children' are human beings that enjoy sexuality as much as 'adults'. If you do not wish to engage in sexual activity with our younger brothers & sisters, then please at least enlighten & educate them on the true philosophies of love, happiness & sexuality. Show them that the violence we ingrate into our 'civilization' is unacceptable, and nurture the emotion & feelings that come naturally to humanity. It will allow them to become more balanced in their post-pubescent years. Acknowledging that sexuality between humans regardless of age is not evil or destructive." Somebody actually argued sex with children will make then better adults. Advice of this nature is typically dispensed by cloven-hooved tentacle beasts wearing person costumes. Unfortunately for the whole damn human race, some of the people who aim to "enlighten" kids (a term here meaning "molest") actually have children of their own. That's right ...
#3. For Some People, It's A Family Business Let's cut right to the chase: a moderator on 7axxn with the sage-like moniker of sarahthec*nt claims to have three children that she and her husband are "bringing up pedo" (her husband is a member, too). This is another way of saying they rape their children and convince them that they're enjoying it. "She makes her own videos of that," says Pam, "and she's one of the (according to her) biggest child pornographers in her area. I don't know where that area is because they are very tight-lipped about where they're located." Sarahthec*nt claims she was molested by her dad as a young girl and enjoyed it so much that she grew up taking pride in her identity as a pedophile. When she tired of shopping around for a "Mr. Right" to have kids with (and then molest), she took to hanging out on a series of pedo chatrooms until she met a like-minded man named "Brian," whom she married then months later. Here, in sarahthec*nt's own words, are the rules they set for their children: Trust us -- withholding sex is absolutely NOT a punishment here. Please note she admits that she and her husband immediately violated rule #1 when their daughter was a newborn. We're guessing that right about now your greatest hope in the world is that Sarah's entire tale is an elaborate fake. But according to Pam, that isn't likely. "She posts videos she and husband make ... According to her, the kids are willing participants. But, obviously, they can't be." It's interesting to see the lines the "child lovers" faction draw for themselves. Continuing sex after a child says "no" is bad, so, of course, the moral thing to do is to simply condition the child from birth to never say no, by never telling them that what's happening to them isn't normal. Pam hasn't seen these videos because that would mean downloading child pornography. But, Sarahthec*nt is a frequent contributor to the site's felonious archives and is regarded as credible by her fellow child molesters. You might be wondering how the hell people like her manage to stay hidden from the eyes of the law for so long. Well, that's because ...
#2. Child Molesters Have A Handbook Any sufficiently difficult task needs a handbook, or, at the very least, a guide "For Dummies." So, some enterprising pedophiles (or unsettlingly imaginative FBI agents) have written a guide to protect their evil, horror-shyt comrades: "The pedophile's handbook was originally a PDF or .doc in circulation among the community," Pam says. "It turns out there's also a downloadable version too." Even more shocking is that people still use LiveJournal. Pam says the handbook includes bits on argumentative justifications for pedophilia, which probably explains why both the guy who tweeted us and the people on 7axxn used such similar language. Among other things, it advises buyers of child porn to do their business in Bitcoin and teaches readers "... how to have sex with children, and hide it from a significant other." The handbook also keys newbie pedophiles in on helpful hints such as using the shorthand acronym CP, instead of actually typing "child pornography." Another term the community uses to avoid suspicion is "young friends," which refers to the children they've either abused or wanted to abuse. The community further protects itself by carrying out all their communication anonymously on Tor and keeping vigilant moderators. Pam actually posted on 7axxn as a researcher, seeking to poll the population. Her thread was immediately identified and locked down by a moderator: "To all- this is a feeble attempt at drawing people out ... It may be an actual researcher (who didn't read the intro tag at the top of our page) or didn't know how the host system he's using works or a clueless lea [law enforcement agent] or whatever ... In any case be aware of these things. Don't ever go to sites asking for survey data. Even someone just 'collecting data' via messages and responses in posts can cause enough personal info to be revealed to help police profilers (who are very good at what they do) to fill in the blanks. I'm leaving the message up, sans link, just for awareness purposes." Any community that forms around something this illegal doesn't last long if the members are dumb about it. These people want as many burgeoning pedophiles to find them as possible because that means more emotional support (and more porn) for them. They know their community is only as safe as its least safe member, so they work together to protect each other from the feds and maintain a place on the Internet where they can freely have conversations like this: "i get hard seeing teen girls crying and being violated and raped, enjoy those murder porn scenes too. Just look at some BDSM sites, you can actually re-enact a 'consensual' rape scene with a stranger and all that kinds of stuff, its not really that uncommon. Not that i would actually hurt someone if they didn't want to be hurt or anything, besides once you do hurt someone or rape someone, usually you lose your hard on pretty quickly facing the consequences lol. I actually share this stuff with people in general conversation with a smile on my face, they just laugh, Lol. Not sure if they think I am joking." "lol." This is the paradox of a group that also desperately want to be acknowledged as "normal" and "healthy" by mainstream society -- just another sexual orientation. In one thread, a member pitched the idea of starting a website for children "between the ages of 9 and 14." It would contain "educational games" and a chat client that would connect these young users to other "kids" who, as you might have already guessed, would actually be pedophiles in disguise. The other members of 7axxn immediately told the poster his idea was rock-fukking stupid, and he lashed out angrily in response: "Herein lies one of the major problems in the entire pedo community: they let 'The Man' and they let 'Them' best us before we even try anything new. They have already beaten us psychologically, so that's why we don't even bother to try. That is one of their tactics. And they are winning. If we united and put are heads together, there is a whole lot more that we can do together ... There is a whole lot more that we can do and accomplish if we would stop letting them beat us before we even try. A site like this CAN be done. Safety measures could be put into place to earn trust, like requiring some sort of photo ID before gaining access to chat features to ensure that only kids are in the chat. I'm sure that you can also come up with a lot of other great ideas, if you are willing to lose this negative mindset that has been imposed upon us and start winning the psychological game that they are playing with us. This is really not the life area that deserves a rallying Hollywood-style pep talk. It's entirely possible that guy was an undercover FBI agent, trying to trick members of the forum into basically handing themselves over on a silver platter. If it was, it sadly didn't work. Busting people who openly brag about the commission of major felonies seems like the easiest job any cop could wish for, but the truth is ...
#1. They Are Very Good At Staying Anonymous If you've got any kind of soul, this has been a frustrating article to read. Now imagine how Pam felt after wading through all this chittering evil at ground-fukking-zero: " ... at one point, I read how one of the mods was arrested for sexual assault on a minor, and she got off -- the person who charged her recanted. [The police] had her RIGHT THERE, and the things she did and admitted to doing on the forum were even worse than anything she'd been charged for." Another day, Pam discovered a thread about the best way to drug children (one quote: "[Drug name removed] does wonders. Very mild and relaxes muscles too ... Btw [removed] only make them tired and lethargic. Not a good choice for a light sleeper unless mixed with etoh (alcohol). Be careful."). And again, those posts are right alongside those insisting that kids just love sex and have no problem giving consent. It's almost as if this whole concept might be completely full of shyt. "You're damn right I wanted to get these people locked up," says Pam. "I looked as hard as I could, for any court admissible evidence, I specifically looked for location data, ID information ... and I found nothing. The people here ... they are very open about what they want to do to children. And very careful about not mentioning where they are located." There's also the fact that Tor offers a lot of protection -- there's a reason drug dealers and investigative journalists also use it to hide themselves. That said, the FBI has broken through Tor's protections before: In 2013, they busted a prolific child pornographer and several pedophile communities. But, that bust ultimately boiled down to just a handful of individuals, which didn't do squat to stop the spread of child porn across the hidden reaches of the Internet. There's a problem when the bad guy faces up to 100 years in prison, and that's a mere consolation prize. In December 2014, a reported 80 percent of visits to the Deep Web involved child pornography. In an article full of staggering horror, that last sentence somehow manages to be the most chilling.
This thread actually brought me out of lurking because it really hits home. Thank you 4north1side2 for highlighting and bringing awareness to this very sad subject.
The sick downside of the internet is that it allows deviants to find each other from all over the world and form communities which before now we at least had the firewall of their collective ignorance of each other and geographical distance. The world is fucked. Watch your back. Hawk your kids. I really feel dirty reading this thread. Lastly, I'm beginning to believe most of the really fucked up psychotics, criminals and murderers were MADE that way from screwed up experiences in their childhood. Nothing hits you harder psychologically than emotional and physical experiences in preadolescence.