Has downlow black men ever been a problem for white women?

Could you two get a room?
lol
j/k

 

Well to be more accurate, she's part of the LGBT community, so if anything, she's part of the transsexual community. Regarding her sexual orientation, it's a matter of who's she's attracted to. If she's attracted to men, then she would classify herself as straight most likely because her gender, since birth, would be female because mentally, her hormones would be feminine. However, that part conflicted with her physical traits, which didn't match that. If she's attracted to both, she's bisexual. To women? You get the idea.

None of these examples really signal anything about being confused. That's more to do with trying to prevent from being ostracized by society because of their bigoted attitudes toward such communities.

Interesting point. At least you're distinguishing between attraction and sexual actions.

Some do it for various reasons in the prison, but one area that people often forget is that if a man rapes another man, it's about a form of dominance over the other person. You also hear about this in the military, marines especially.

Tammy, being bisexual means you're attracted to both sexes. What's described in part A of that definition is intersex. That's when you have ambiguous genitalia or is a hermaphrodite. Thus, part A in the definition is completely incorrect and blatantly wrong on so many levels.

 

Ehhh, that wouldn't be me. It's usually the meat, muscular men who likes a little stretch up the booty hole. I'm sure your asshole reads, "Exit Only", but hey if you shit poopsicles, then call me and I'll be sure to call a CWD to your house and have a closer look at your rectal canal.

We already did. We're con-COCK-ting a new porno called "Flaccid Bootyworks." Don't worry, it's man on pre-op tranny sex here.

 

Oh I do love the way you turn a phrase, GQ :heart:

 

there's alot of unneeded homophobia in here for what gays dont bother or care about straight people as much as straight tend to think they do and cause issues and problems with them and just plain hate on them. they just want to live their lives just like anyone else in fact the whole LGBT community smh people disappoint me

 

I heard about "prostate milking" first here... had the super bad idea to google it, and found the most revolting x-tube of my life (after life-style fisting pics...)

:smt107:smt076:vom:

Of course it could have been that he was 1. gay 2. tiny and/or 3. hairy and 4. white

 

That's not an accurate portrayal on how to milk the prostate. Easier example would be men donating their sperm to a sperm bank.

 

The fact is that the majority of people on these forums have an ignorant perception of the LGBT community. And this isn't "bad" in a way that they refuse. Rather, they haven't really educated themselves enough relating to certain things. Simply interacting with them won't make them any smarter. Rather, they should read up on human sexual behavior in this case.

I mean this sort of attitude is pretty much similar to those who are ignorant of interracial relationships. And they would use the same arguments or statements to create this narrow gap.

 

Understandable.

But simply interacting with them won't really give you a major answer. They can only give you the response that they are attracted to who they like or prefer. Beyond that, they are still learning about themselves. However, there are books out there which can help explain the entire means of sexual orientation.

 

Co-sign X 1000

 

i think it's because he's open minded and accepting of all people

 

Pay him no mind. African males are generally ignorant of human sexuality in general. No offense to those who are otherwise educated.

 

Not to put too fine a edge on the subject, but the definition offered seems consistent with the use of prefix, "bi". Bi simply means two, and in this definition refers to two sexes. Bear in mind that none of these are medical terms, so there is some interchange of words that occurs and in this case, it's a a very literal definition.

 

BBW, you seem to be fascinated with human sexuality & psychology, maybe you should consider getting a Phd in it.

 

My understanding is that state of mind is determinant in those individuals who consider themselves "trapped" in the wrong body, not hormones. If it was a matter of hormones alone, then a man who takes female hormones would suddenly feel like a woman, which is not true. Taking female hormones doesn't change the way the brain is wired. In any case, to suggest that all men who "feel" female from the time they are young, have female hormones, isn't based on scientific fact.

In fact, there are some 6 - 8 distinct and different disorders associated with those who are sexually ambiguous. There are cases of women who have XY genes, male genes, who look female, have a vagina, but no uterus and they are heterosexual in every other way.

Not to put too fine a edge on the subject, but the definition offered seems consistent with the use of prefix, "bi". Bi simply means two, and in this definition refers to two sexes. Bear in mind that none of these are medical terms, so there is some interchange of words that occurs and in this case, it's a a very literal definition.

 

I'll definitely consider it.

You're pretty much ignoring the general overview of sexuality here, swirlman. Here are a few facts and I'll keep it simple:

1. Both men and women possess progesterone, testosterone, and estrogen. This isn't based on baseless data. This purely understood and common knowledge for anyone who reads into human sexual behavior and in sexual orientation. When it comes to men, we generally have a higher level of testosterone and lower level of estrogen and women have higher levels of estrogen produced and lower levels of testosterone. We

2. Also, you say that such material isn't based on scientific, but logic tells you're completely misinformed since a component of the brain DOES operate sexuality. It's called the hypothalamus and this LINK provided should give you better insight on the matter. You're going about this at the wrong angle. Sexuality is biological, neurological, as well as sociological and it's not limited to homosexuality. This applies to all variants of sexuality.

3. The definition bisexual strictly means a person attracted to both sexes. That's not the same as a person who possess ambiguous genitalia, which is identified as intersex. That sort of logic is as bad as someone trying to claim that astrology and astronomy are the same because of the prefix "astro-". Our understanding of sexuality have evolved since then, but people never take the time to really keep in touch with such topics.

 

I don't see any problem with my understanding or what I have said at all. To begin any argument with, "it's only logical" is to show that you don't have sound foundation.

You are simply choosing to ignore facts, and that's fine. Bi is a prefix that means two, period, bicycle, two wheels, bi-weekly, twice a week, bi-plane, two wings, etc. Your analogy makes no sense because you start with a faulty premise, using two different words, astrology and astronomy and suggesting that my example is erroneous.

In your example by the way, the prefix "astro" indeed does refer to "stars" in both words. But meanings are never determined by prefixes alone, as my examples above show. You should also know that the prefix "inter" means between, so intersex means, between the sexes, or interpreted differently not one sex or the other, sexual ambiguity.

You have to consider the whole word, not just the prefix, which is why your insistence to something otherwise is troubling. However, so be it.


Unfortunately, you have not added anything of value to this discussion. But, that's fine. My intention was not to create the tension that has obviously resulted as you would like to be seen as the "expert" on this subject. Very well...

 

What sort of facts have you provided in your argument? When you begin with "My understanding...", this is purely based on assumptions with limited knowledge. I've also provided a link to prove your thoughts wrong in the matter and yet, you failed to respond to the information I've provided. Seems like this post has more to do with phonetics than the overall discussion pertaining to sexuality. This may be the result that you lack a proper response to this.

And furthermore, you're still having a difficult time understanding the difference between bisexual and intersex. It shouldn't take this much difficulty to recognize that they are two separate definitions, so to apply bisexual with a person with two genitals or ambiguous genitals (which means "not quite either or sexual organs) as opposed to the proper definition, intersex only shows that you have little knowledge in the matter.

Bi means two and bisexual simply implies a person who has a strong sexual attraction with both sexes. This is where you lack a solid foundation on phonics. And no, intersex and bisexual aren't synonymous with one another either. Here's a concrete bit of information for you relating to intersex and you'll see the discrepancy then:

I've studied human sexual behavior in-depth and I know what I'm talking about here. To argue with me on this issue will result in you not having a leg to stand on. Get over yourself. You may specialize in politics, but sexuality is clearly one of your weak areas. I never claimed to be an expert. I'm simply more knowledgeable in the discussion than most since sexuality is something I'm fascinated by and I've studied in-depth.

 

This is meaningless. Say what you will, the dictionary is wrong, literal usage is wrong and you are right. You can draw arbitrary analogies and use references that don't relate to the original error I suggested. But, whatever....It appears that you need to get over yourself my friend. You should also look up the definition of phonics as you are misusing that term as well. It has no application in this discussion. I have said all that I wish to about this subject.