Hosts of Guys We F*****D Podcast Catching Heat

I'll even take a bw NF over a ww SJ

 

FYI, they debunked that decades ago.

 

I disagree. It's something that's real and most can't see it, but I know plenty others that do.

When your conscience is on a higher frequency you pick up on things others don't.

 

https://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28315137

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...lity-test-is-pretty-much-meaningless-9359770/



Regardless, I can't stop people from believing in fairies or gods, so, believe what you want. I wish you the best.

 

I'll check it out. BTW it's not a belief unless you think psychology is fake and that Carl Jung was a whack job.

Irrespective of that. I know what I have perceived for myself.

 

It is a belief when it has been debunked yet you still hold faith in it.

 

These articles are about debunking the test, no? I haven't looked at that test in well over a decade nor do I put stock into it, as I mentioned before, I don't need a test to type people.

Just because that test may have major short commings doesn't mean the 4 categories of temperament doesn't exist.

Actually if I was going to direct someone to a test or website about it I would direct them to David Kerseys temperament website. Although I haven't been to that site for years myself.

 

Those articles are about debunking a test.

Just because a reliable test may not have been found doesn't mean the subject matter is false.

 

If you follow that link you'll see that I actually disagreed with someone's test results. That was back in 2014 ish.

 

Watch the final video if you must. The test has been debunked and the individual identifiers are debunked along with it. It is a very old theory with many criticism that doesn't hold up today. But, as I said, believe in what you will and I will respect your beliefs.

 

It's based on a theory by carl jung, the 4 indicators are a product of the test itself.

 

Carl Jung didn't develop the Meyers Briggs. So what test are you talking about?

Maybe I would think it was false if I have never perceived it myself. I don't even know how someone would prove it. Don't really care honestly.

 

Bruh you can call it batshit if you want, no offense taken.

Lol

 

You mentioned him. I mentioned it was slightly inspired by him. That's all.

 

No worries m8t.

 

Well, there is a reason I chose the hard sciences for my bread and butter. No room for argument.

 

Understandable.

 

One can’t really debunk Social Science. One can find arguments for and against a theorem. I find myself in one of the MB-types like many others. The question is more, is it useful? I think it can be.

 

Who are „they“?

So according to you women all point their husbands to an early grave?

Studies have shown that married men live longer and are healthier than unmarried.

And besides, it sounds sexist and offensive to me.

 

Boring! The world is not just black and white but full of grey shades