Eddie Murphy and Paige Butcher

Discussion in 'Celebrity WW/BM Couples' started by Kid Rasta, Sep 17, 2012.

  1. Reverie

    Reverie Well-Known Member

    Of course you do.
     
  2. RicardoCooper

    RicardoCooper Well-Known Member

    Nope. From my POV I'd still fuck Sharon Stone years past her prime just to say I bagged Sharon Stone. But that's from a thirsty male perspective
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • List
  3. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    There's women who would do the same for childhood crushes like Joey Lawrence
     
  4. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    Interesting thought. I don't particularly try to understand women's behavior, just elaborating on what my take is, but this sounds plausible.

    I can see a lot of dudes following suit. I'll pass tho. Anyway last time I checked Demi Moore can still get it.
     
  5. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    Because its like saying men prefer wet water. Begs the question of what kind of water do women like.
     
  6. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    But we are talking LT relationships here, no?
     
  7. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    Didn't know were differentiating then this requires a different approach. I was thinking all kinds
     
  8. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    I agree if we are just talking sex. If we talking LT, I don't think fame is something high on a woman's list, if it's even there at all.
     
  9. K

    K Well-Known Member

    I'd disagree. There are definitely those women who are all about the fame and wanting to be associated with it. There are a lot of people out there who are all about the illusion rather than the substance.
     
  10. Reverie

    Reverie Well-Known Member

    The problem is men putting premium on looks.
     
  11. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    Women don't?
     
  12. K

    K Well-Known Member

    I think women, in general, like to think that we don't place a premium on anything that superficial. But we all know that's bullshit. Maybe it's not looks, but then it's power, or fame, or money, or status.
     
  13. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    That's even more superficial than putting a premium on looks imo. At least looks is an inherent characteristic of a person. Those other things are social constructs.
     
  14. K

    K Well-Known Member

    Ok, and the argument would be that those other things are things that are earned via talent, hard work, etc and therefore somehow more noble.
     
  15. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    Well.......why can't a person earn that for themselves Instead of obtaining it through a mate?
     
  16. z

    z Well-Known Member

    #Truth
     
  17. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    Because its easier, just like obtaining sex through getting material goods. Like Chapelle said "If men could have sex in a cardboard box they wouldn't buy houses"
     
  18. Reverie

    Reverie Well-Known Member

    Well, if a woman is together with someone who have eight children with 4 women, at least he should have money...
     
  19. Beasty

    Beasty Well-Known Member

    Well if he has money and Fame, she could at least be hot. So what's the issue??
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • List
  20. Reverie

    Reverie Well-Known Member

    From my point of view, none.
     

Share This Page