They arrested Allison Mack today & it's all over the media. They saying this cult was sex trafficking ring: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n...ted-alleged-cult-sex-trafficking-case-1104575 I think TDK is wrong. She's in trouble.
This story makes me cringe the most. Hollywood got a lot of shit with them, I remember a porn star spoke on underground secret sex clubs that both male and female celebrities and even MAJOR celebrities participated in. But in regards to Allison I wonder how long it will be before she plays the victim and says she was brainwashed by Keith Raniere and NXIVM.
Looks like the 20/20 news episode airing on ABC tomorrow night is gonna be on Allison Mack based on the commercial I just saw several minutes ago.
And of course he denies it https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...okaw-sexual-harassment-allegations/556639002/
Ugh. Did anyone listen to this crapola?? Tom Brokaw hit on this chick in the 1990s and she made it sound like she was about to be raped. Oh, and he grabbed her around the waist one time. This shit happened when she was 30 but she tells her story like she's a shy, never kissed a boy, 15 year old girl. Brokaw sent her a few very polite emails, met her at her hotel room, she told him she wasn't interested and he backed down. She didn't even directly work for Brokaw so I don't see why it was sexual harassment for him to hit on her. If you and I work for the same company but in different departments, it's suddenly sexual harassment for me to shoot my shot and see if we can't be fuck buddies?? GTFOH.
He tried to kiss her. She was creeped out. He left her crude notes. Dropped uninvited to her dinner date with friends. She said she couldn't believe he would think she'd be interested. And the women defending him saying he never hit on them. Well, duh. Doesn't mean the two women weren't if they can prove it. At this point, if you can prove it, speak. If not, best just to rack it up to having dealt with a sleaze boss. Women have all had to deal with this behavior from co-workers or bosses/supervisors in the past.
See how this works. Bill Cosby having multiple accusers is a good reason to believe he did it. Multiple women defending Tom Brokaw and people are like they're lying, they're protecting him, ect. he did it because one person says so. So what? If you have multiple people accusing it makes sense that your guilty, but if multiple people defend you they're all lying? And the hypocrisy of Megyn Kelly to say 'You don't know what you don't know'. It makes no sense to say that when all you did was believe women who said something with no evidence. Because in reality unless there is proof YOU DON'T KNOW. Their just words, liars exist, they have their motives they just didn't tell you. And more hypocrisy of these women rushing to his defense like Maria Shriver when they have been about just believe women, hear them out and letting women speak their truth, unless it's their friend. But didn't some of us say that wait until it's someone close to these women and then they will change their tune and believe the women are NOW lying. I believe the hypocrisy also happened with Lena Dunham, but got swept under the rug. This shit is why proof, evidence, investigation, due process is necessary! Not believing them just because they are women accusing men of sexual misconduct or rape.
No offense to this women who post here but enough is enough. Chivalry is dead. I've dealt with some mentally-ill women this year too, in my personal life. Men of influence need to go back to male-only clubs, spaces. No mentoring, no promotions, no nothing, lest some grandma emerge 30 years later saying you squeezed her ass or some shit. They even tried to get Stan Lee on this crap, the man is 95 years old for God's sakes. Give them nothing, take everything. That's my move going forward
Some Women who signed it in defense of Tom are now coming out saying NBC pressured them to do it. Which makes sense. The extreme and sudden huge defense by 100 women just didn't make sense, unless it was co-coordinated. Also, l heard another woman has come forward.
You can't have it both ways. If you believe 100 women were coerced to support Tom Brokaw, you can't complain when Cosby supporters question the integrity and motives of his 50 accusers. If 100 women say Brokaw didn't sexually harass women in the workplace, I have to believe the majority of them are telling the truth. It's funny because you are making the same arguments in reverse we heard about Bill Cosby's accusers. Brokaw is retired and doesn't run NBC. If a female NBC employee didn't want to support Brokaw, it's not like she was going to lose her job.
??? Your analogy makes no sense. Its out of context. 100 women saying he didn't touch them, and some saying they were forced to say that...what does that have to do with Cosby's accusers? No one questioned the 100 women defending him, except to say just because it never happened to you, doesn't mean it didnt happen to them. Now some are saying they were coerced on top? Not good.( what's that saying- the cover-up is worse than?) He still works for NBC, as a Special Correspondent and works on documentaries as well.
Oh, wasn't expecting that from ya. He did get a pass for a long time. Strange how he kept that trial of his in perpetual limbo. Didn't it take like 10 years to get to verdict. I'm still a bit foggy on his dirty deeds because his victims rarely speak. He's like a svengali or sex-cult leader.
I hope TDK is consistent & keeps the same energy for Michael Jackson. My opinion is if they're gonna do this to R. Kelly, they gotta be consistent & bush every artist with with a domestic violence, sexual assault/rape, & other criminal past. If they just pick & choose, we all know it's gonna be racially biased against black male artists & whoever online SJWs want to "cancel" (which also usually black male celebs too). I'm surprised to see The View agrees with me: