they are mad because of the hillary clinton documnentary

seriously the GOP is mad. why?

according to the article
" Priebus answered that it seemed like a conflict of interest for a news organization to implicitly support a candidate. The RNC has issued the same threat to NBC for its mini-series about the former First Lady who's rumored to be running in 2016"

does he have a point?

read the article.

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/cnns-erin-burnett-confronts-gops-reince-priebus-over-170748149.html


BTW. I better step my game up...stink is kicking my ass on thread making. LOL

 

Elizabeth warren 2016!!!!!
time to give a real woman a shot at this mess made by old folks!

 

Sen Warren has some work to do in the Senate to get those bankers it is too soon for her to run for higher office. Strangly,the GOP did not btych when the Romney documentary was shown on CNN a month before the election.

 

She will have been there for 4 years and the current president was senator for less than that. She also was chair for the oversight Panel that did tarp. She is the most dangerous person for the republicans due to her knowledge of the economy. She will leave hillary in the dust. The longer you stay in the senate, the more history you have.

 

President Obama was Illinois State Senator from 1997-2004, prior to his run for US Senate. Thus having a lot more senatorial experience than Senator Warren. I'll admit, she does have a lot of credentials regarding economic policy, but she does play into the Paul Krugman economic philosophy, which doesn't quite go well with the majority of the public.

She has some excellent ideas, but I know that things will be muddled if she doesn't establish connections to really make some substantial change. But none of that would matter if she's against Hillary Clinton. So, better for her to build up her credentials as senator before stepping into the White House.

 

I don't think that 1997-2004 makes up for her having to take charge on the oversight over the second worst financial disaster in USA history. If I were to switch the two, I don't think Sen. Warren would do such a bad job as Illinois State Senator. Even with President Obama's current experience, I wouldn't want him to be on that oversight committee. If she builds, I can promise you she will never be president.

 

She most likely won't be a terrible state senator either. And her specialty is economics, but I do wonder whether she can actually deliver instead on just economic theories. I do have high hopes for her to succeed though.