Trayvon Martin's Murder

Discussion in 'In the News' started by goodlove, Mar 8, 2012.

  1. orejon4

    orejon4 Well-Known Member

    And he was armed with concrete.
     
  2. flaminghetero

    flaminghetero Well-Known Member


    Trayvon was screaming for his life because zimmerman had his gun ALREADY DRAWN...

    There wasn't much of a fight...just a terrified child blindly flailing and trying to avoiding getting shot..

    He didn't pop anybody in the nose....that's the murderer's lies...

    When you kill an unarmed person you have to make shit up...even injure yourself....

    None of zimmerman's blood was found on the concrete...

    His injuries and behavior were not that of somebody who was slammed repeatedly on the pavement...

    If Martin actually slammed zimmerman's skull on the concrete he'd be dead and Martin on trial for murder...
     
  3. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    how do you know the gun was already drawn?
     
  4. flaminghetero

    flaminghetero Well-Known Member

    it makes sense....better than believing zimmerman.

    Anybody that is so gung-ho as to disregard the police dispatcher isn't going to wait till the last nano-second to draw his gun....especially since the area was supposedly sooo crime infested..

    If you are in an area KNOWN for tigers....you're not goint to wait until you are in the proccess of being mauled to draw your weapon....you're going to be locked and loaded..

    He didn't even have a reason to call the cops...much less follow him..
     
  5. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    Too hard to prove fam
     
  6. flaminghetero

    flaminghetero Well-Known Member

    better than believing zimmerman...


    A pussy like that is quick to pull his gun...he's not the type to wait until hands are laid on him to draw..

    I'm just going by common sense..
     
  7. flaminghetero

    flaminghetero Well-Known Member

    Yet there was no blood on the conrete......... anywhere...

    The state even didn't try to ge a conviction..
     
  8. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    Makes you wonder if they really wanted to convict. This seems like common sense .
     
  9. orejon4

    orejon4 Well-Known Member

    We needed you on the jury. Instead we get stuck with people predisposed to believe the most outlandish "Blacks As Boogeymen" hypotheses.
     
  10. Mikey

    Mikey Well-Known Member

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/20/justice/zimmerman-verdict-voices/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

    -- Amanda Freeman, a Connecticut blogger who wrote about her experiences after the verdict on TLC's parenting blog; Caucasian

    Ex-Sanford police chief: Zimmerman probe 'taken away from us'

    [​IMG]

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive/index.html?iid=article_sidebar

    !!!
     
  11. ArmyRanger

    ArmyRanger Member

    AMEN!!!!!

    HE had a gun, NOT Treyvon. That gun gave him more courage than he would normally have. That BULLY mentality, him feeling superior over someone in a weaker position. You best believe he would NOT have approached Treyvon if he thought he also had a gun.

    The kid was only 17 years old, a teenager. Me being a man, I can't even comprehend getting into a physical confrontation with a teenager Treyvon's size to the point where he would make me want to shoot him.

    Usually with teenagers like that, all you have to do is grab the back of his arm real tight. Squeeze it hard and pull him towards you and get in his face. The teenagers I've dealt with like that usually starts crying.

    You are a MAN dealing with a TEENAGER. A lot of times all you have to do is talk to them real firm.

    But that is just me, a military person who has gone up against MEN twice Treyvon's size.
     
  12. Bookworm616

    Bookworm616 Well-Known Member

    This is all assumption. Every last sentence is nothing but conjecture. Unless you were directly involved or you witnessed the entire altercation, you cannot possibly know how it "went down".

    All of these assumptions being thrown about in this thread are getting ridiculous.

    You are bringing your bias into your assumptions. The truth is you do NOT know what happened.

    And if someone else calls Trayvon a "child" I'm going to scream. He's a teenager and/or young man. Not a child.
     
  13. archangel

    archangel Well-Known Member

    Trayvon is a teenager and/or child. I don't want to see adult or man in this comment. Few governmental agencies or people would consider a 17 year old a man. young or old.
     
  14. Bookworm616

    Bookworm616 Well-Known Member

    He's old enough to have a license. Less than a year away from being able to vote. He's not a child.

    He's a young man.
     
  15. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    by law he is a child. he was called a minor
     
  16. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

  17. The Dark King

    The Dark King Well-Known Member

    If you ever spend time with teenagers you can see they Are Still kids My friend
     
  18. Stinkmeaner

    Stinkmeaner New Member

  19. archangel

    archangel Well-Known Member

    Driving licenses does not require you to be a man. You can obtain one at 16.
    If a draft happens right now, does he go to the military? no

    If the election happens right now, Can he vote?no

    You have to be a legal adult to have these happen to you.


    He is a boy/child/ kid but not a man. young or old. He is not an adult.
     
  20. Soulthinker

    Soulthinker Well-Known Member

    Kevin Jackson is a real FOR(Friend of Ruckus). Giving the excuse for Whites to act this way towards Black males and race relations good in the 1950's?!! It is like saying race relations in South Africa is good in the 1970's. Boy,I pity that man's sons when they are stopped by White cops and WW clutching their pocketbooks at their presence.
     

Share This Page