Trayvon Martin's Murder

I agree 100%.




They don't care about Trayvon's rights. Why should he have the right to walk down the street on his way home from the store without being accosted by some stranger in the dark? Why should he have the right to go to the store for skittles and tea in a neighborhood someone else thinks he has no business being in? Why should he have the right to be a teenager who wears what the majority of teens wear and to actually have the hood covering his head in the rain? Why should he have the right to be a typical teenager who engages in the same activities and makes the same mistakes that other typical teenagers do? Why should he have the right to defend himself against an aggressive stranger (THE KIND OF STRANGER PARENTS WARN OUR CHILDREN TO BE LEERY OF) who is threatening his safety/life? Why should he have the right not to be shot down like a damn dog by some wanna be vigilante who targets him based on his looks (race/dress)? Why should he have the right to a life and a future without having someone steal that chance from him for no damned reason?




No one is saying to dismiss anything. What people need to do is to stop making Trayvon's "past" out to be more than it is. Do you consider yourself a thug since you did jail time in your past? My guess is that you would never apply that label to yourself, but for some reason you refuse to give that 17 YEAR OLD KID the same consideration you do yourself and pass unfair judgement on him based on stereotypical bullshit.





If a model citizen/"victim"/killer like Zimmerman says something, regardless of how ridiculous it is, it must be the gospel truth. :smt012

According to how he comes across, other than himself and a select few, black people are always in the wrong.

Then again, maybe it's because the defense made their little animation that "proved" Zimmerman's nonsense story (that anyone with common sense would never believe to be true). It's not like people can actually make animations portray whatever they want them to; if it happened in the animation, then it really happened. That's right folks, even cartoons are real. :rolleyes:





Truth be told, NONE OF THIS SHIT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF ZIMMERMAN WOULD HAVE DONE THE RIGHT THING!!!! The fault and responsibility is on him 100%, because it was his choices/actions that created the situation in the first place. Even if Trayvon beat his ass defending himself, Zimmerman brought that shit on himself. I don't care what nonsense spin anyone puts on it, the only one standing his ground that night was Trayvon, and it's a damn shame that he had his life stolen from him for no fucking reason. There is NOTHING that made Zimmerman's actions acceptable that night, and those who think otherwise should be ashamed of themselves IMO.

I can't rep you girl, and I'm sure you got plenty of it from others for this post, but here's my love for you and this post, especially the bold. That's been my stance from the get-go and we can debate all day every day, but it all goes back to this fundamental truth. Great post!! :smt023:smt023
 
I really hate injecting myself into this long, downtrodden case, but here's a food for thought...

...there's a strong possibility that Zimmerman could be lying his ass off regarding his [lack of] training. Even if you took one week of MMA training, you'd have some knowledge on the basics on how to strike your opponent down. He took one year of it continuously and he went from a 1 to a scale of 10, which shows that he's fairly proficient in his self-defense.

He was in good shape, really solid shape, based on the videos. It wasn't until he stepped into the courts that we saw him gain a few pounds. But for some reason, selective memory often skews the person's so-called objective nature and instead inclined to still see this person as a victim.

Does this look like a pudgy fuck to you?

abc_george_zimmerman_2_dm_120621_wg.jpg

​
Mma training ....best shape of his life? That little pudgy fuck Zimmerman couldn't bust a grape if that was the case he wouldn't have got his ass whipped by TM.
 
I can't rep you girl, and I'm sure you got plenty of it from others for this post, but here's my love for you and this post, especially the bold. That's been my stance from the get-go and we can debate all day every day, but it all goes back to this fundamental truth. Great post!! :smt023:smt023

I'm absolutely ashamed of myself that I can look objectively at a situation, look at both sides and come to a conclusion based on EVIDENCE AND FACTS, regardless of color.

Meanwhile, 219 Trayvon Martins have been killed and 1,000 other individuals have been wounded in Chicago this year. Have a nice day.
 
I'm absolutely ashamed of myself that I can look objectively at a situation, look at both sides and come to a conclusion based on EVIDENCE AND FACTS, regardless of color.

Meanwhile, 219 Trayvon Martins have been killed and 1,000 other individuals have been wounded in Chicago this year. Have a nice day.

You go ahead and be ashamed of yourself, sweetheart. The truth is just as Tam said it. GZ brought this on himself. He was instructed to remain in his vehicle and not approach Trayvon. And as a NHW member, he is instructed not to carry a weapon, much less use one, even if he has a permit to carry. He defied those instructions/rules and a young man died because of it. Race doesn't even need to play into it. GZ wanted to be a hero, plain and simple.
 
You go ahead and be ashamed of yourself, sweetheart. The truth is just as Tam said it. GZ brought this on himself. He was instructed to remain in his vehicle and not approach Trayvon. And as a NHW member, he is instructed not to carry a weapon, much less use one, even if he has a permit to carry. He defied those instructions/rules and a young man died because of it. Race doesn't even need to play into it. GZ wanted to be a hero, plain and simple.

lol, I always love this line. NO HE WASN'T. He was told by the dispatcher,

"We don't need you to do that."

There's a difference. But the facts won't change what you believe going into the case.
 
I'm absolutely ashamed of myself that I can look objectively at a situation, look at both sides and come to a conclusion based on EVIDENCE AND FACTS, regardless of color.

Meanwhile, 219 Trayvon Martins have been killed and 1,000 other individuals have been wounded in Chicago this year. Have a nice day.
fool get out here with that bull., every post u tried to find tray guilty of something and find zim innocent. u tried to paint tray a thug and zim an angel....shut up
 
lol, I always love this line. NO HE WASN'T. He was told by the dispatcher,

"We don't need you to do that."

There's a difference. But the facts won't change what you believe going into the case.

You want to play semantics? So those exact words weren't used. But what part of "We don't need you to do that?" is questionable?!! You want to discredit the whole thing because he was speaking to a 911 operator? (If I recall, I read that he spoke to a police dispatcher, not a 911 operator.)

If you had a medical emergency and called 911 and were given instructions to help someone until paramedics could reach you or the victim, would you try to be a cowboy and do your own thing, or would you listen to the 911 operator and FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS?
 
You deserve your reputation points. Sadly, I cannot grant them since I need to spread the love first.

And the last bit alone should have been a dead giveaway as to what should be followed.

You want to play semantics? So those exact words weren't used. But what part of "We don't need you to do that?" is questionable?!! You want to discredit the whole thing because he was speaking to a 911 operator? (If I recall, I read that he spoke to a police dispatcher, not a 911 operator.)

If you had a medical emergency and called 911 and were given instructions to help someone until paramedics could reach you or the victim, would you try to be a cowboy and do your own thing, or would you listen to the 911 operator and FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS?
 
Lol and do tell me what authority does a 911 dispatcher have again?
let me get this str8 u r telling us zimmerman need not to listen to people who have been trained by the state to handle situations as such but tray need to obey zimmerman? u also say zim didnt break the law disobeying the state but tray should obey zim because.....?

what law was tray breaking at the time?

the police on the stand stated if they saw tray they wouldnt have questioned him so why zim?
 
Last edited:
To get cops out there. I ask again where was a law broken........all I hear is a bunch of people saying what they FEEL he should have done. Fuck feelings what is the LAW. if we go on FEELINGS I'll say shiiit I wouldn't have got out the car if I was him but NI LAW WAS BROKEN. once again I say FUCK FEELINGS it sucks but its the truth.

INTENT is a major factor when it comes down to the law. Obviously he did not INTEND on sworn offers to be present when he engaged TM. So why did he want to get the COPS there at all?? To do paper work after the fact?? Thats some arrogant shit considering that it turns out that GZ could not do a better job than the COPS anyway. WHAT LAW DID GZ ENFORCE BY ENGAGING TM?? What did he accomplish??
 
To get cops out there. I ask again where was a law broken........all I hear is a bunch of people saying what they FEEL he should have done. Fuck feelings what is the LAW. if we go on FEELINGS I'll say shiiit I wouldn't have got out the car if I was him but NI LAW WAS BROKEN. once again I say FUCK FEELINGS it sucks but its the truth.

I say manslaughter for sure but that's what I FEEL he should get cause he got out the car. BUT that's not against the law.......is it a tough pill to swallow? Yep but its gotta be swallowed. Once we start convicted people on what people FEEL should happen were fucked

so killing a kid .....no law is broken...lol
but charge him mansluaghter. u r all over the place.
i and stump said mansluaghter from the start ur as has been say gz is innocent and its all trays fault. u r full of it. typical conservative.
 
What authority does a 911 police dispatcher have again?

You're just arguing for the sake of arguing. If you're in an accident or you witness an accident and you call 911 and you're told to stay on the scene, will you do what you want or will you follow instructions and stay on the scene?!

You better hope I don't come across you lying in the street, bleeding. I won't call 911, because according to you, they have no authority to help me help you. I needn't listen to what they say. :smt012
 
Lol and do tell me what authority does a 911 dispatcher have again?

Lol.

And do tell me what authority does George Zimmerman have again to go out and hunt and kill unarmed black kids?

He was holding a PHONE
SKITTLES
ICE TEA

Zimmerman was holding A LOADED WEAPON of DEADLY FORCE

So before you want to ask such asinine questions and in a way that's very condescending, perhaps you should start with what authority Zimmerman had.
It's a less mind numbingly stupid question.
 
To get cops out there. I ask again where was a law broken........all I hear is a bunch of people saying what they FEEL he should have done. Fuck feelings what is the LAW. if we go on FEELINGS I'll say shiiit I wouldn't have got out the car if I was him but NI LAW WAS BROKEN. once again I say FUCK FEELINGS it sucks but its the truth.

I say manslaughter for sure but that's what I FEEL he should get cause he got out the car. BUT that's not against the law.......is it a tough pill to swallow? Yep but its gotta be swallowed. Once we start convicted people on what people FEEL should happen were fucked

You know what you should do PANIRO?

You should write a little letter of your FEELINGS ON THE MATTER to Trayvons parents. Maybe throw in an extra one for his brother.
Also while you're at it, write a little of how you FEEL Zimmerman broke no LAW I'm sure he'd dedicate his best selling bio to you. And all the other dumb fucks out there who lack any kind of logical coherency.

Oh, wait.

To paraphrase you:
FUCK FEELINGS!

You and good 'ole zimmy would get on smashingly with that piss poor attitude.
 
Back
Top Bottom