Cheaters

luvattractivewomen said:
Like When Women do it?

Forgot one: They just want to experience something new and different. "I wonder what it would be like with him..."

:-P
Click to expand...

Honestly, I think that's less of a reason for women. I'm sure there are women who do cheat for that reason. But I don't think it's as prevalent.
 
chesbaygrl7 said:
Honestly, I think that's less of a reason for women. I'm sure there are women who do cheat for that reason. But I don't think it's as prevalent.
Click to expand...

It's a common excuse for plenty of young women and men in this generation. I don't think it's prevalent in your generation, or at least your generation learned to keep quiet about it.
 
How many threads do we need on cheating??? This subject has been talked about to death on this board.


I've said it before, and I'll say it again...the reason people cheat is because they're selfish and they want to. If people are not willing to be faithful, they shouldn't get into monogamous relationships.

It doesn't matter what kind of spin (aka excuse) is put on it, there is NOTHING that justifies cheating on one's significant other, and the onus doesn't fall on the person who gets cheated on either.

To the assholes who use that 'What she/he doesn't know won't hurt her/him.' line of shit, you couldn't be more wrong. Cheating is one of the most hurtful (and sometimes deadly) things you can do to a person you supposedly love.

As far as who cheats more, it's silly to turn it into a men vs women thing. I think the numbers are pretty much even when it comes to who's doing the cheating.
 
Tamstrong said:
How many threads do we need on cheating??? This subject has been talked about to death on this board.


I've said it before, and I'll say it again...the reason people cheat is because they're selfish and they want to. If people are not willing to be faithful, they shouldn't get into monogamous relationships.

It doesn't matter what kind of spin (aka excuse) is put on it, there is NOTHING that justifies cheating on one's significant other, and the onus doesn't fall on the person who gets cheated on either.

To the assholes who use that 'What she/he doesn't know won't hurt her/him.' line of shit, you couldn't be more wrong. Cheating is one of the most hurtful (and sometimes deadly) things you can do to a person you supposedly love.

As far as who cheats more, it's silly to turn it into a men vs women thing. I think the numbers are pretty much even when it comes to who's doing the cheating.
Click to expand...

They are.
 
luvattractivewomen said:
It's a common excuse for plenty of young women and men in this generation. I don't think it's prevalent in your generation, or at least your generation learned to keep quiet about it.
Click to expand...

I think we've all seen the studies that reveal that men typically get aroused more quickly by visual stimulation and that they think about sex quite a bit more than women. A man may still love his wife and still enjoy sex with her but just want to try a new flavor. Not saying women never do this - they do. But I think it's less common.
 
chesbaygrl7 said:
I think we've all seen the studies that reveal that men typically get aroused more quickly by visual stimulation and that they think about sex quite a bit more than women. A man may still love his wife and still enjoy sex with her but just want to try a new flavor. Not saying women never do this - they do. But I think it's less common.
Click to expand...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/men-want-sex-more-than-wo_n_3306784.html

There are studies that contradict everything that you've said.
 
To be honest, pretty much everything that can be said has already been said in the other threads about the exact same subject. So, I am gracefully exiting this thread. Enjoy.
 
luvattractivewomen said:
If you would like to have a game of finding studies I suppose we can make a thread of that. That would at least be something different. Otherwise, take care and catch you in another thread.
Click to expand...

No, it's not that. It's just like the latest diet that comes out touting that this is THE diet - until the NEXT diet comes out and IT'S the one....just when you think you understand the rules, they change.
 
chesbaygrl7 said:
No, it's not that. It's just like the latest diet that comes out touting that this is THE diet - until the NEXT diet comes out and IT'S the one....just when you think you understand the rules, they change.
Click to expand...

The only rule is that some people are selfish in a marriage and stay that way an some aren't. That's kind of how it goes I guess.
 
its funny on TV talk shows ,when a woman cheats they make up all kinds of excuses...but when a dude cheats ..he is the spawn of satan.
 
An alleged cheater was publicly shamed Wednesday, and now his photo has gone viral.

"If this is your husband, I have endured a 2 hour train ride from Philadelphia listening to this loser and his friends brag about their multiple affairs and how their wives are too stupid to catch on. Oh please repost..." a Facebook user wrote on Wednesday.

And boy, did people repost. At the time of publication, the photo had been shared more than 86,000 times -- and counting.
Salon writer Anna North points out that the post "is just the latest in a long line of public shamings on social media," and that "it's now possible to use social media to enforce behavior in public and semi-public spaces in a way it never was before."

She also notes, however, that "those who publicly shame others now open themselves up to public shaming too."

We want to know: What do you make of the Facebook post? And is it OK to put cheaters on blast?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...nd-face_n_3405192.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

would you tell your friend if their wife/hubby or boy/girlfriend was cheating?
 
goodlove said:
An alleged cheater was publicly shamed Wednesday, and now his photo has gone viral.

"If this is your husband, I have endured a 2 hour train ride from Philadelphia listening to this loser and his friends brag about their multiple affairs and how their wives are too stupid to catch on. Oh please repost..." a Facebook user wrote on Wednesday.

And boy, did people repost. At the time of publication, the photo had been shared more than 86,000 times -- and counting.
Salon writer Anna North points out that the post "is just the latest in a long line of public shamings on social media," and that "it's now possible to use social media to enforce behavior in public and semi-public spaces in a way it never was before."

She also notes, however, that "those who publicly shame others now open themselves up to public shaming too."

We want to know: What do you make of the Facebook post? And is it OK to put cheaters on blast?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...nd-face_n_3405192.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

would you tell your friend if their wife/hubby or boy/girlfriend was cheating?
Click to expand...

I pretty much agree with most of the comments.
The person who posted this on Facebook has no idea if anything that was said in this conversation she/he wasn't apart of was true or just boasting or men being men.
They may have posted it and opened a can of worms that destroys the people actually involved and know what's going on. What if he was just shooting the shit and he and his wife have kids and he can't make it right and all kinds of hell breaks lose?

I hope whoever did this is identified and sued for what just happened.
Unless they caught the guy in the act, what was said was hearsay and its slander what she/he did.
They should be sued for that.
You want people to be held accountable on PUBLIC social media?
Guess what?
You yourself are not immune to being held accountable for your piss poor decision to post and spread this on the Internet.
 
Alinoa said:
I pretty much agree with most of the comments.
The person who posted this on Facebook has no idea if anything that was said in this conversation she/he wasn't apart of was true or just boasting or men being men.
They may have posted it and opened a can of worms that destroys the people actually involved and know what's going on. What if he was just shooting the shit and he and his wife have kids and he can't make it right and all kinds of hell breaks lose?

I hope whoever did this is identified and sued for what just happened.
Unless they caught the guy in the act, what was said was hearsay and its slander what she/he did.
They should be sued for that.
You want people to be held accountable on PUBLIC social media?
Guess what?
You yourself are not immune to being held accountable for your piss poor decision to post and spread this on the Internet.
Click to expand...
You can't be serious. Don't put your business in the public if you don't want this happening. simple rule.
 
archangel said:
You can't be serious. Don't put your business in the public if you don't want this happening. simple rule.
Click to expand...

Um. So are you serious?

If I'm on a train going from say NY to Philly with friends, I can't have a public conversation because it might end up more public than what I originally planned on PUBLIC trans with nosey Nancy's snapping pictures and posting it with a stupid comment about what they just hear?

No offense...but GTFOH with that bullshit.

No one will say anything to anyone ever if this trend continues.
Then you'll be posting wondering why no ones friendly anymore.

Ill be sure to dig this thread up.
 
Alinoa said:
Um. So are you serious?

If I'm on a train going from say NY to Philly with friends, I can't have a public conversation because it might end up more public than what I originally planned on PUBLIC trans with nosey Nancy's snapping pictures and posting it with a stupid comment about what they just hear?

No offense...but GTFOH with that bullshit.

No one will say anything to anyone ever if this trend continues.
Then you'll be posting wondering why no ones friendly anymore.

Ill be sure to dig this thread up.
Click to expand...

You don't understand the strings behind this question. more public .... lol

If the police attacks you, and I record that they said that they attacked you. I decided to air it on the internet and it goes on cnn. What? The police can say well he shouldn't have place it on the internet. We didn't intend it to be more public than we originally plan.(more public lol) They then proceed to sue me. sorry, not going to agree to that.

You got to look at it in the bigger picture of things.
 
archangel said:
You don't understand the strings behind this question. more public .... lol

If the police attacks you, and I record that they said that they attacked you. I decided to air it on the internet and it goes on cnn. What? The police can say well he shouldn't have place it on the internet. We didn't intend it to be more public than we originally plan.(more public lol) They then proceed to sue me. sorry, not going to agree to that.

You got to look at it in the bigger picture of things.
Click to expand...
she took a picture of a stranger on a train. After eavesdropping on a convo that she wasn't a part of and had no right to post a public opinion on.

How is that even anything close to recording the police abusing someone?

It's not even comparable.
Getting beat up by the police is illegal. Talking on a train isn't.
 
Alinoa said:
We took a picture of a stranger on a train. After eavesdropping on a convo that she wasn't a part of and had no right to post a public opinion on.

How is that even anything close to recording the police abusing someone?

It's not even comparable.
Getting beat up by the police is illegal. Talking on a train isn't.
Click to expand...
You are missing my point. The comparison is in the recordings. It will eventually blow up to is it legal to record sound in the public. The response should be a yes because you don't know what could be talked about that is in the case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom