combat roles to women?

Discussion in 'In the News' started by goodlove, Jan 23, 2013.

  1. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    are u still mad you werent stud enough to play high school and college football?

    someone's gotta fill the water coolers
     
  2. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    LOL. your ass just caught what I wrote didnt you. LOL

    college players , High school players and I never met an NFL (nation FELONY league) player but im sure they would wash too.

    P-U-S-S-Y


    :)
     
  3. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    aaaahhhhh....but I didnt wash out. PUSSY:p
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2013
  4. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    great...i bet u were the best canteen filler in the company

    PUSSY

    :p
     
  5. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    LOL. that would be a rank above the navy...:)

    PUSSY
     
  6. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    [​IMG]

    winning
     
  7. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    Just because the navy doesn't guarantee you the mos you signed up for doesn't mean you can diss it like that

    :(
     
  8. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    LMFAO. you are too funny. LOL:p
     
  9. TheHuntress

    TheHuntress Well-Known Member

    Clearly, being the mental giants you are, you don't understand the difference between my comment and the ignorant fucktard who spoke above.
     
  10. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    when did you become so arrogant

    it's only going to get worse when you finish your phd

    :axe:

    at least it's acquired arrogance tho..something you worked towards

    unlike our male arrogance...which we're born with in the form of a dick

    :p
     
  11. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    what are you studying anyway?
     
  12. TheHuntress

    TheHuntress Well-Known Member

    I'm not. You all are just pissing me off so bad lately that my normal attempts to be civil on this topic are lost. I don't actually think you're stupid, but I do think it was awfully prickish of you to not acknowledge the vast difference between the misogynist bullshit of the previous poster versus what I said to you guys. And I'm pretty sure you KNOW the difference, so act like the smart person I know you generally are and acknowledge it instead of continuing to perpetuate this constant men vs women bullshit.

    TreePixie and I both said there are differences, but if a woman can MEET THE STANDARDS OF THE MEN, then she can join. I simply said that I don't understand how a man's physical ability was the litmus test for being able to fight from the beginning. Women and men do have different skill sets that I do believe can be an asset to the battlefield, but does that mean that everyone belongs there? No. There are certainly some men who don't belong there, too. Making it open to everyone means that the people who can pass the standards WILL and those who can't, WON'T, and then you'll have better qualified people fighting on the front lines. I don't see what the big fucking problem is with this concept.

    My phd has nothing to do with it. I'm training to be a psychologist. Ya'll are fucking interesting in that regard.
     
  13. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    we'll provide you with the perfect subjects then

    :p

    like i said before, if women meet the standard i really don't give a shit

    everything else I wrote was high fructose corn syrup
     
  14. TheHuntress

    TheHuntress Well-Known Member

    Industrial and organizational psychology.
     
  15. TheHuntress

    TheHuntress Well-Known Member

    You do on the daily. :)

    I enjoy you, pettyofficer, I really do, even though you make me crazy sometimes. lol Not as crazy as the NYC Wunderkid, though. No one could touch that. ;)
     
  16. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    but i thought you liked history and stuff....keep remembering that museum pic you had up way back when...

    and you have a right to be strong and steadfast in your actions here

    you've already achieved what many males (who would indeed claim that women are not smart enough to do XYZ) have not, so you already know limits and ceilings can be broken
     
  17. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    im flattered to have my name in the same paragraph as TDK

    seriously I am

    no one is trying to make you crazy tho...I talk a lot of shit and nonsense on the forums (it's the internet..come on now), and TRULY hope people aren't taking this too seriously
     
  18. TheHuntress

    TheHuntress Well-Known Member

    I do. I love history, it's my thing on the side, but I am super passionate about workplace psychology, training, employee motivation, and cultural consonance. I kind of fell into this stuff when I started my MS in training and performance improvement and never looked back. Ten years ago, had you told me I'd be doing this, I'd have looked at you like you had 3000 heads. lol

    And yes, limits and ceiling can be broken, or at least cracked. But I can also tell you that they still exist. I sat in my colloquium last summer where the professor in charge of trying to help us insulted me in front of the group and make a comment about silly women coming from an education background who think they can 'hack it' in the field of psychology, implying it is for men only. I reported him to the staff, as did a few other ladies at my table who were equally as appalled as I was.

    And this was 2012, right? You'd think.

    I don't, but I do think a big part of why the forum has gone downhill is because the men vs women thing continues to get carried on too far when people could stop and say 'look, all bullshit aside, so and so has a point..... and now back to my regularly scheduled asshatery' lol To be honest, I think that's why most of us get so frustrated, and I know that's why quite a few people I've spoken to have left...or at least it was a chunk of their gripe with this place.
     
  19. Bliss

    Bliss Well-Known Member

    Listened to an NPR interview with...

    BETH BAILEY, a Professor of History at Temple University who studies gender and military institutions,
    COLLEEN FARRELL, a U.S. Marine Corp Captain who is a plaintiffs in the ACLU lawsuit challenging the DOD's combat ban,
    and ELAINE DONNELLY, President of the Center for Military Readiness.

    Beth said Panetta defied Congress by completely bypassing them, he CAN NOT make this policy, that their is an absolute quota agenda and those who ensure the quota is met receive promotions, that the official policy is "fair" standards, not "equal" and that eventually when women are dismally failing to pass the test, the standard WILL LOWER - it won't be announced, they will just make the test easier FOR ALL, until women can pass it.

    *One National Guard soldier called in and he said that the training test for army is 42 push-ups in 2 mins for the men.....13 for the women. He said carrying alone almost 100 pds of equipment on missions is back breaking, even for him and he's a big guy.
    But the 13 to 42..wow HUGE disparity, I must say.

    The debate was really good. If anyone wants to listen to it, here is the link -

    http://whyy.org/cms/radiotimes/2013/01/28/women-on-the-front-lines-ending-the-combat-ban/
     
  20. pettyofficerj

    pettyofficerj New Member

    fixed

    honestly tho..without the men vs women superfights, what would this place be?

    maybe there should be a section of the forums for people to shit talk
     

Share This Page