Newspaper Publishes Gun Owners' Names and Addresses

lastly, not shitting on bliss, tdk and you for the fears of losing your 2nd amendments rights to own a gun but no where will you lose your ability to own a gun. where are you guys getting that from?

as far as the newspaper deal....thats is fucked but isnt ironic that the socall law abiding citizens who fite for the constituition are trying to take away free speech and its legal to write the shit they posted....and the people who are centralist aboput have armed gaurds......


HHHHMMMM.

 

Obama unveils sweeping new gun control proposals

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_new...veils-sweeping-new-gun-control-proposals?lite

very similar to mine.....according to TDK and beasty obama is a dumbass.....you voted for him right? that makes you a dumbass by association

it only applies when they want it to apply. LOL

 

President Barack Obama called for background checks on all gun sales, whether in stores or at auctions and conventions, as part of efforts to prevent gun violence.

The president also called on Congress to reinstate the ban on military-style assault rifles and limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds for all weapons and urged the public to pressure Congress and the gun lobby to push for stronger steps against gun violence, saying "the only way we can change is if the American people demand it."

Obama issued 23 executive actions to prevent gun violence that do not require congressional approval, including strengthening background checks on gun sales and expanding safety programs in schools.


breaking news on CNN.com

 

obamas gun control


http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/...-battle-gun-violence-165956859--politics.html

source yahoo news.....

 

Its called responsibility. The paper printed the names of rape and assault victims hiding from attackers who bought a gun because the police completely failed them but I guess theyre like Zimmerman roo so fuck em right?
Same with correction officers and other law enforcement who try to hide their identity from the criminals they protect us from.
You geniuses seem tonthink gun ownership means a bunch of rambo wannabes waiting for a fight when its the furthest thing from the truth. So keep acting like this was a simple case of free speech and not some assholes way of trying to sell more papers at the expense of innocent people. I live in the area where the Journal News is cirulated and all this has done was make life harder for the law abiding.

 

Hold on so I dont agree with one thing Im calling him a dumbass? You aight?
You know the most amount of posts doesnt mean you win right little buddy?

 

What on earth are you talking about? When have I used NRA talking points? Saying the 2nd Amendment was also written to keep government from tyrannical? GL I provided direct quotes to support my argument none of which are from the NRA

 

LOL. He's confused.

He keeps responding to his own posts, too. Easily ten times so far.

 

Hes desperately trying to make a point and keeps failing

 

Some of you may not have intended to, but many of your pro gun rights arguments are NRA talking points; defense against a tyrannical government, right to unlimited magazine clips, opponents want to ban all guns, personal safety for all means greater access to guns, etc.

 

Who wants greatee access? I am for pysch evaluations and periodic updates. Listing all adults ib the home. Requiring lock boxes. Registering all guns both long guns and short guns but the magazine limitations to 10 rounds per clip is ridiculous along with a lot of the other provisions wont reduce the gun violence they are so worried about. How does it stop or even reduce spree killings?

 

uuuhhh you did say that I was a dumbass.....do I need to pull it up.

 

ignorance is so sad....

ok, lets explain why the prez and other thinking people believe limiting the number of bullets in a clip. BUT first what it will not do....

you can buy 6000 rounds/bullets (bullets is a word used by civilians) but a clip/magazine (magazine is commonly used by military people...Im former army so we said magazines) should only hold 10 rounds in it to be fired.

now, using the loughner shooting (where gabby gifford got shot) 13 people got injured and 6 died. he had a 30 round clip and let them all off in 15 seconds.

a hit rate of 19/30 = 63%

no one could not do anything for that time. you may think 15 seconds isnt long but let them rounds fly over your head and its a life time......

now you have cut his rounds down to a 1/3. thus if he held the trigger as he did he may only had 5 seconds of shooting .

also may cut down his hit rate by a third sooo with a hit rate of 63 or 60% 6/10 would have been killed and or injured.

 

now, so he ran out of 30 rounds people jumped him so he couldnt reload. thus after 10 people would have done the same and less lives impacted.

got it.

 

acvtually I have been responding to bliss, tdk and beasty....yall have been repeating the same old same old.

and yes tdk you called me a dumbass for the clips....you want to see yet

 

what were you saying? oh yes....because I disagreed with one thing I could him a dumbass? hhhhmmmm yes you did.

 

is that you saying Im a dumbass off of one thing?

you are so evil you cant keep up with it.

who is confused?

uuuhhhh hello?

and if you look at the posts I was talking to beasty....who was being a moron in comparing a car to a gun. how intellectually dishonest a person can be? then he goes on to compare wwbm relationships to the 2nd amendment. what the fuck? yes I spelled the whole shit out

yes you.

 

.
you just trying to deflect from the shit you said about blacks not having constitutional rights, so what the fuck was you doing in grade school when they metioned black history? Probably sucking on your thumb and copying from your neighbors test paper. Now millions of people can hit Google and laugh at the dumb shit you said

 

GL its posts like these that make me call you a dumbass. Beasty compared two dofferent sets of freedoms when he compared driving to guns. Two things we have the riht to own and purchase that can cause death yet one isnt banned or restricted the way the other one is. People accept car accidents amd drunk driving as necessary risks for being able to use cars.
He also compared the 2nd ammendment to dating white women because you unrelentlessly keep bringing up the fact that when they made the law blacks werent included in type of citizens allowed to participate. His point and mine as well is then you should apply the same logic to dating and marrying white women. The laws werent in favor of that union until the 1960s but you dont run around saying dont marry that white woman because "they" never intended for black men to marry white women.

 

hey dumb shit....he was comparing owning/use of a car versus a gun. I told him specifically the difference....go back and read.

guns are not banned and not as restricted as cars are.

Go back and you will see where I stated that a car must be registered on every sale....a gun doesnt.

people dont necessarily accept accidents...if they did then why did people/govt campaign for seat belts and crash tests and have cars engineered for crash. example; a car made in germany must meet the crash spec's for america if you buy it germany and transfer here .

guns dont have those kind of restrictions.

lastly you can not compare guns to cars due to the intended use.

damn.