Newspaper Publishes Gun Owners' Names and Addresses

so the regulations included 10 round clips and now you disagree. UUUUHHHH you the dumbass

 

There is no Constitutional right to carry firearms down the street for a civilian.

 

GL, waay back in post #45 you called us "little bitches". And in post 43 or 46 something like that, you said we are bitching.
So yeah, TDK can in turn tell you your 30 clip q was a dumbass question. And indeed your hypothesis's ARE childish and ridiculous. All you got is Zimmerman. You have no argument or reasonable justifications to restrict guns from law abiding citizens.
You really do need to chill until you know what you're harping about.

 

OK lets start there.

so you can sit there and say if you disagree its ok to insult......ghee thats what selfcentered.

look at what he agreed to earlier then doisagreed.

also, where did I ever insult his position except to say stay away from the NRA GOP because they have alternative motives and he knows that thats why he ran from em.

 

Are you asking, or making a sarcastic statement? :smt017 Please clarify.

 

really!!!! and now you are insulting people but you dont want to be insulted. now thats childish

 

I think he said he is a cop. In cali the cops are still allowed to have the weapons in their homes that are illegal for everyone else, mabe thats why he is not concerned with our rights.

 

really so to do nothing is a better answer. what would you suggest.....add more guns and see what happens

 

just what I thought....typical right winger. they can insult others but when yo9u come back they want to scream foul then justify hypocrisy

 

That's a state by state interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. It's not really guaranteed by the Constitution.

 

Dude its a dumb question. "what do you need a 30 round clip for"?

Huh? You need it in order to fire multiple rounds. How can you not figure that out.

But what's it to you. It's not your place to tell a legal gun owner how many bullets he can legally fire. Damn. It's a clip, period. Next you'll ask why do we need a 10 round clip, then it'll be why 6, until you say we cant have clips period. :smt012

 

AB already said that. lol

 

if you gop back Im sure me calling HIM bitch not you (but if you want to be included you can) TDK slung that bullshit it...then I returned. so get your facts str8 and stop being a GOP talk show host

 

guess what.....TDK agreed then disagreed. other gun-owners and NRA members are agreeing with it too.

 

GL, I'm done with you, you're posts are becoming increasingly childish and quite redundant now. Talk to someone else.

 

here is where you lack common sense. all of the mass shootings one thing was common....loughner and CO. the gun jamming or empty clip.

loughner had 30 rnds in 15 seconds killing six wounding 13.....afterwards they were able to tackle him. CO the gun jammed and he gave up.

what does that tell you? also asny gun fight is not gonna last over 30 seconds anyway. if it does....they arent after your tv set.....you pissedf them off.

now you keep insulting me then I will group you with TDK. If you cant talk to like an adult.

 

bye see you later...

 

Well it was in the context of a State. In CA is was legal. Regan took that right away by restricting the right to carry.

Noooo, say it ain't so, AB! :smt089 lol.

 

:smt081

 

This morning, I was listening to an interview on NPR regarding what this newspaper did. The host was speaking with a Mayor or Congressman, (I'll edit this once I get the name), who said the paper had also asked for the names and addresses of his constituents and he order that the paper be denied the info.

They discussed the right to information verus the right to privacy, and he said that under law you cannot claim the right to info if u seek that info for profit. He said he will take the paper to the highest court if they try to override the denial.

He said once they list the names of mentally ill, he will re-consider. He said that they don't publish names of rape victims or criminal children because there is a code of ethics and he sees no redeeming reason for it.

But the worst part was this: he said cops and retired cops names are on that list, and now people that they have arrested and such....know where they live, and they are furious.

He said that domestic violence victims and stalked victims who are in hiding and who obtained a gun for protection, now are exposed. He said he has gotten hundreds of calls from tearful, terrified women...