Seal and Heidi Klum

I am pretty sure they loved each other, but Heidi changed from a successful Top Model to a greedy money machine. Instead of living her life with her beloved ones, she donates them for her success. And to be successful all the time makes many people think that they know all better, that everything has to be as they want, and this is bitter for the partner. And sometimes this partner only can defend and survive by looking for someone else.
After her break-up with the italian playboy she was a lovely lady and Seal was her real big Chance in life (in contrary to her model contracts and shows), maybe she can re-think, but I doubt. Her father wasn't denying.

 

cosign

 

Wrong, they live in Los Angeles.

 

I stand corrected

 

plenty of them do

 

I wouldn't be surprised if they do make it official.


It's abnormal for a Hollywood relationship to last.


Divorcing is part of getting married. You do it when the time is right.

 

That's because women support their men. Whats that saying..oh yeah, "Behind every successful man there is a great woman"

 

yea, that's usually the lady that raised you. lol:smt045

 

Arch for the fucking win. Rep coming sir.

Edit: Damn gotta spread it around first.

 

I guess, it says nothing for the man who did.

 

Or men who succeed usually share with their women. Women who succeed will look at a man who isn't as successful as her and wonder why she wasn't with a more successful guy lol.

Personally I think most women (not all) want a man who more successful and more powerful than they are. It's part of how we as a society describe masculinity.

 

You said woman not person so it makes sense to me. :shrugs:

 

If the top part is "true", then why it is that other "greedy money machine" divorcing people we have debated on here lately are the ones who "looked for someone else?"

What tha...so now you're penalizing mommy Heidi for going out there and making a successful living? Smh.

 

Beat me too it if that is what she meant.

 

I can see why you think I'm pulling a double standard and here is why its different.
Successful man less successful woman= equals man is responsible for the woman and her well being. He has to not only meet her needs but her wants.
This scenario is totally socially acceptable.

Successful woman less successful man= equals a man who is responsible for his own want and needs and if he sat around in a fully staffed home with nannies and cleaning people he would be seen as a lazy bum.

Men aren't socially afforded the luxury of being kept like a woman is. So even if our woman is capable of taking care of us its incredibly unattractive when she does. Definitely not true the other way around.

 

So did you -

So now that it's "she raised him", why would she be bitter and jealous over his success??

 

Celebrities are mostly extremely egoistic-narcistic people, who else wants to see oneself everyday in news and no private life? You can earn money different ways, this cannot be the reason.
Men, if they are too successful,tend to feel like they can have any woman and mostly there are enough around them, so the temptation is there , the possiblity is there, so unfortunatly many of them get on the roll. I have seen it many times, suddenly they feel like kings, false friends and hypocrites are with them,their life is like" drugs and rock'n'roll" (how people say ) and their own wife is suddenly not good enough anymore.. Sad, but many times true

Heidi Klum already is critisized long time, when you see interviews of her and she is talking such bs like "family and carreer is no problem for ,me"..it's a kind of laugh..on which costs? It seems that her day has 72 hrs. And for what? Such stupid shows like "Germanys Top Model" or that we are all nerved, because her face is everywhere?

Claudia Schiffer is smarter, more human. When she married she took herself off of the market. She made 250 Mio and fine..Sometimes you see her, but it's definitly rare. She knows what is really valuable in life

 

I think we have a miscommunication. When you made your post and replied using women that was in reference to a spouse. Which is usually true. A female spouse does well the man must be jealous. A man does well you never hear about a woman being jealous and bitter.
When Arch made his comment about the woman who raised him he was referring to his mom. Get it now?

 

No miscommunication - I'm aware who you initially referenced - the spouse, as you were when I responded to you referencing - the spouse.
When "for the win" Arch flipped it in my case from spouse to mom (you know you even repped him for it, lol) well naturally, if its now mom, then its mom all the way. Get it now?

 

No you make no sense to me. The part where you said:
Originally Posted by archangel View Post
yea, that's usually the lady that raised you. lol
I guess, it says nothing for the man who did. - here I thought you were talking about the man who raised him. - did I get that part right?