Firefighters wont help

As opposed to having your whole house burn down??? They took that risk and now they are paying for it.

And Eye of Ra, gtfo of here with that "sheltered life" bullshit(you dont know me) I at least realize the real world can be a very cutthroat place.

 

Really? Your conceited attitude says different. And I don't need to know. I'm just going by the face you put forth regularly on this forum. If that's not how you really are then come real. And trust me I guarantee that I know just how cutthroat life can be far better that you....

 

What?? This statement makes no sense.

 

Well then old man, you should realize those people should of paid the freakin 75 dollars!!! Sheesh, this isn't rocket science folks.

 

Now who's being over dramatic? Just say you just have a different POV and leave it at that. Your little overblown displays of aggression and attempts at putting people who have different views from your own "in their place" get boring after awhile and makes you predictable in your responses.

 

Yeah. I got all that but.....nevermind. You'll just keep going back to pay the money no matter what's said.....

 

How? Because I'm saying the firemen should have put out the fire? Take out the family owing the house and if the house was just abandoned with no owners and it caught on fire, hould the firemen put out the fire then because no one paid for the house being covered under those circumstances? Should they let it burn down and risk it becoming a safety to surrounding property & homes? Whose responsibility does it become then?

 

I know they are not going to get it. They have their conservative viewpoint googles firmly in place. I don't even care honestly. I just find it funny how they both love to insult and belittle in someway anyone who doesn't share their viewpoint.

 

^This

 

Tamstrong, if you can own a house you should be able to have 75 dollars on ya. Thats all I'm saying.

 

Cosign!:smt023

 

He/they are arguring. Everyone else is just posting a viewpoint they don't like.:smt119

 

I'll engage in an exchange of viewpoints but I've given up trying to trade barbs with closed minds.....:smt101

 

And that's one of the main reasons why when I log on here I mainly keep to more lighter bullshit type posting rather than do more high minded topic posting. I deal with closed-minded people on the regular in real life. Don't like dealing with it online.

 

Wurd... I'm about to adopt the same attitude...

 

No you short-sighted, knock-kneed, sheltered jackass. If you can own a home, then you have the ability to afford house note and utility expenses. Insurance of any kind are extra expenses, which aren't part of the original house note.

 

I guess when you grow up with all the luxuries and never really experienced the meaning of penny pinching, then OF COURSE you'll resort to the "personal responsibility" argument. But seeing you practically had a financial advantage (and please Charlie, spare me the "I left home with just the clothes on my back" nonsense), you can't really understand at all.

Plus, the fire department were part of the city in this matter, so of course those individuals were paying their taxes which went to those public officials, right? Therefore, the actions of the fire department were more so deplorable. They could have have asked for them to pay $75 AFTER tending to them. If the fire department was a privately owned company, then the situation would only be more complicated.

 

Because you guys almost always come into threads and use some sort of insult/attack tactics i.e. your little signage that you used on me yesterday or Iggy with his little overly aggresive & curt postings. Speaking only for myself have no problems with you guys having conservative viewpoints or expressing them, it's just with how you come across with them. It's almost like you don't actually want to discuss anything but just like throwing your opinons out to start fights. That's why both of you catch flack from people and why some people think you are both white. You both come across hostile.