Are there other brothas here like me?

Sigh, why do you always have to go there? There is no basis for that comment. Its silly really. Nobody is defending him.....
Women are not defending him because there is nothing to defend.. it has nothing to do with his gender. Just stop this grade school stuff. Your better than this.

 

No because I got scolded in another thread where a woman did the same thing where she asked for advice because she was thinking of dating bm. I said something and was accused of running her off and not giving her chance. Didn't see anyone demanding a chance for this guy.

 

The OP in the other thread never came back. Clearly, she felt threatened. This guy was attacked from the get-go too, but he came right back in his own defense.

I actually understood what he meant. His mistake was in assuming he couldnt get a woman that appealed to him physically with a personality that he also liked.

 

I'm sorry you got scolded for that - she was odd imo - didnt see your post or the scolding tho, I spend very little time on here at the moment.
However, I don't think that has anything to do with her gender either - actually women get accused by men to run suspect new women off quite a lot.

There are a few people on here that think the rest of us jump into conclusion too fast and run people off - they are always the same people who do that and they do it equally for men and women.
In fact, I had that discussion with one of them (female) not too long ago about a suspect male poster (who is no longer here).

 

The frequency of posts is irrelevant. When it was a woman being called suspect people call foul but not when its a guy. Stick around you'll notice it. I've seen it with SA and Open Heart off the top of my head.

 

Seriously, your have selective memory - both SA and OH got jumped on by plenty of women. Both of them got it very rough from a lot of us women, come on. Very few women have defended them and you know that.
and actually, SAs defenders are mainly men, shall I call foul on that?
Nah, that would be just as silly as your argument in that.
Please please stop this - its not conductive and its dividing us further.

 

Just playing devil's advocate for a moment: People who are considered suspect and then leave the board, which seems to "confirm" their suspect status, could it be that they left the board because of the treatment they received right out of the gate? And not because they were, indeed, a suspect? We tend to assume the attitude "See? What did I tell you? Suspect!!" if they disappear. What person in their right mind, would stick around after some of the things I've seen said to people? I could be as true as gold in my intentions, but I wouldn't put up with that nonsense. I would leave too. JMO.

I will admit to being somewhat gullible. I believe the best about someone until they prove otherwise. But if they're not given a chance to prove otherwise....

 

Ever here of a couple of little cities called New York and greater Boston?? Chalk full up of Italian, Greek and Portuguese women all over the place, not confined to specific neighborhoods. I suspect that many other cities are the same.

All I'm smelling here is troll.

 

pixie, the troll has been banished.

I believe it was Jenny Art or someone posing as a "brotha".

 

yey! I had a bad day today and missed all the goings on.

 

Absolutely true,
but that was not what I was talking about. I was only talking about the men vs women thing that I find oh so tiring.

 

FYI : Most of the indivduals who have been considered suspect right out of the gate usually have stuck around the forum for quite awhile before they have stopped posting. As FG mentioned there are always one or more people who say that the suspect person was not given benefit of the doubt and so people usually back off to give them the chance to prove they are here for sincere reasons. Nine times out of ten the person who is looked at as being suspect goes on to continue to do suspect things and usually ends up being banned or they finally just stop coming all together. Ask about or better yet look at the post history of one of our most infamous suspect posters, Nico if it is still up.

 

Cosign

 

there was a time that I considered white women to be less attractive to black women...and If I did find a white woman physically attractive it would be one with dark hair and reminded me of a black woman...but as time grew, I sort of learned to appreciate a woman for her unique qualities and not a presorted assembly physical parts...no blonde , pale, blue, pink...it is all good...



one more thought, most quality woman are beautiful when you are all alone with them in a nice quiet spot...

 

well he was in another thread and I gave him benefit of the doubt and he was spewing alot of antibw stuff and was saying things as such:

1) they dont get me
2) they are ghetto
and so on and so forth. so I replied in so many words women are women no matter what race. you just have to get your talk in order. then he went in like he was perfect person perse then I knew he had an agenda that wasnt riteous. I believe he came in and was trying to see if the BM here would cosign on his BS. I wasnt having it.

good enough.

 

Reese Witherspoon is much prettier than Salma Hayek.
Even Mexican men will agree with me about this one.

 

This. Most people who have some sort of an agenda usually start off just like this nerdPower guy did which is why he was immediately looked at as suspect by most of the people here. We've seen too many of them come through on this site with the same MO. Must be a troll handbook circulating out there or something.

 

true dat

 

lmao I can't cosign that.

 

I feel ignorant for READING this thread.