You really feel bad for her? Dude dated Elin after so she knew what was up. Besides Elin seems to be WINNING as they say.

 

No that's the point- she didn't know until Jen madden broke the story. She's just finding out like the rest of us.

 

And he was killing pit bulls.

He should get a reward for that.

I could see if he was killing Cocker Spanials or Collies...but funky-ass Pit Bulls...??

If I had my way you wouldn't see any...anywhere.

 

Damn sucks for her but big deal its who he used to date not who he's dating on the side. Besides all those wealthy dudes just recycle women. How do you think women like her end up with multiple dudes within the same small circle of billionaires and hundred millionaires.

 

It IS a big deal...Rachel Uchitel is the woman who essentially blew her marriage up. She was his #1 mistress.

 

Like I said it was in his past not his current chick or side chick and how long ago did they date or was he just using her like a blow up doll like Tiger did

 

You didn't fix anything..

Not surprised your a Shit Bull owner...that explains a lot.

 

True. I have to agree with this, although I would replace "America" with "Conservative America" and apply that to your reply because it depends on where in America you are.

 

urgh, i wonder if you get dizzy, spinning circles and doing whatever you can to avoid the point and make up things to pass your weakily argued points across like they have relevance.
but i will humor you one last time-
point 1- you did argue about it, your whole basis of argument is somehow my posts come from a place of anti ww pov, hence why you go on a tangent as seen in the 2nd paragraph f the quote inn post 422, page 43 of this thread.
point2-sellout rhetoric? you are getting overly-sensitive. i'm calling you the approriate terms based on your actions......
point3- and you worry about my contribution so much, why again? if you were so genuinely concerned, you would ask me....but you and the drama queen who co-signed your post in the thread, wanna draw your own conclusions so you can talk shit later. but then again, i wouldn't be surprised cnsidering it's the same cast of characters who went at me for my first post, which i crictisized someone for calling a bm a gorilla. i guess they knew i wasn't an asskisser, wetting his pants over foot photos.

 

she need to come by me and i will make her feel better. bm #2 is all black, no cambla-anything confusing me...:smt081

 

You are the one humoring me? I spoke my piece on the issue and came back 20 pages later to find the men and women arguing. Which lead me to declare this the worst thread of the year. You took exception to that and here we are. One only needs to review the exchange to see the snipes, and the consistency of the arguments that were made.

Your disinclination for White women is what I said on this thread. I've given you different retorts for your other posts that adulate Black women and/or diminish White women.

 

point 1- yes i am. they argue in every thread, they are adults but they act like children. they argued in my rep thread for chistsakes! there is no consistency in strawmen......
point2- oh brother this is the crux of the issue i have with you. you make things up to justify your grandstanding hyperbole. again you assume, instead of asking. there is no praise or bashing of bw/ww. again it's only in the deluted minds of those who make threads like bw loyalists,etc. again ppl with that that mindset aren't quite rationale. at the end of the day no worship, nor blame is necessary. bw are not devils, ww are not angels. they are both human beings...there is nothing wrong with attraction for either or both, but this extra stuff is quite sad....

 

I was accounting for a review of both of our mutual snipes and arguments, consistency or lack there of. You should stop using the term "strawman" if you don't pinpoint the actual argument from the false one.

We are reading each others posts and inferring from them. I don't have to ask a troll if he is a troll (not calling you a troll). You never asked me if I was what you say I am. By your own logic, if I'm irrational and diluted (not saying you are calling me that) your adulation for Black women and diminishing of White women is all in my mind. "Unluckily" for you, I'm not the only one who think this about your posts.

 

many ppl can be wrong at once, but it is nice still to have a fanclub. you can be president.....

 

I don't know what kind of world you are living in if you really believe that. The reality is, is that they have not taken an aggressive stance against him because it doesn't make sense for them to do so. However, I can't convince you about what's obvious, so believe what you want.

 

He's right though. A TON of animal activists (vast majority of them are progressive liberals) were really hard on Vick and still are.

 

Just like a domestic abuser- if you abuse animals, you will do it forever. People like that don't change.

Nike isn't getting a red cent of my business. Michael Vick should be living in a cardboard box trying to shill for pennies.

 

Why? Cause dude can throw a pigskin around?

Bullshit right back at you.

If you abuse anything- human or animal- you don't deserve to live in society.

 

Inherently, however, progressive liberals aren't "hard" against minorities.

If you don't understand what I mean, just reply back and ask me to clarify what I said.

 

Michael Vick isn't on the same level as a human. I'd take my dogs over his company any day.

Your next point?