Elin now dating a white guy

I see it like this....

he fucked up....He put his dick into something he had no business. when you fuck up like that you gots to pay. an ordinary guy in some states would have to pay about a certain % of their income and its capped at a number of kids. so lets say 20% per child.
here is a story about a 29 year old with 21 kids.:

Father, 29, in child support court says he has 21 kids
A 29-year-old father has 21 children, and with that many mouths depending on a minimum wage job, WVLT looks into what's going on.


KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (WVLT) -- On paper, he has 20 possibly 21 children.

With a minimum wage job, he can't afford to support them all.

What is the state to do?

Desmond Hatchett, 29, told WVLT he wasn't out to set a record, though he certainly holds it in Knox County Juvenile Child Support Court.

Hatchett's children range in age from newborn 11.

There are at least 11 mothers; probably several more.

Constitutionally, there is nothing the state can do to limit him from having more.

"I had four kids in the same year. Twice." Desmond Hatchett told Volunteer TV.

On Friday, his name appeared on the docket 11 times; Representing about 15 of his 21 children.

"Can you keep up with it all?" WVLT asked Hatchett.
"Yeah," he said.
"You know all their names, and ages and birthdays?"
"Yeah."

Hatchett's name is pretty controversial at the old courthouse.

"The children can't be supported all by Desmond, so the state of Tennessee has had to step in," Hatchett's attorney Keith Pope said.

It's your tax dollars at work.

WVLT spoke with one mom who has two children with Hatchett.
She is supposed to get $67.50 a month. But many times, she gets a lot less than what she's owed.
They all do.

"It'll make it through half the month," the unidentified mom said.

She told Volunteer TV, Hatchett is the father of her two sons. And she says her 4-year-old is expensive enough on his own. "He's a heavy milk drinker. And milk is not cheap," she said.

"It's frustrating, but usually, when I ask he give it to me," she continued.

It's due process-- the state is only allowed to take 50% of Hatchett's paycheck.
That's 50% split multiple times.

"You look at when they filed, how many children they have-- he has several mothers that he has two children with. And, it's tough" Pope explained.

Still, Hatchett says the women knew what they were getting into.
They were all aware of his large family.

One said, she doesn't like it but she deals with it. "It's about the kids. Not the parents," she said.

Hatchett agrees he should do what's best for the kids.

"Do you intend to keep having children?" WVLT asked.
"No." Hatchett replied.
"You're done?"
"I'm done. I'll say I'm done."
"What made you say that?"
"I didn't intend to have this many. It just happened," Hatchett said.

Desmond Hatchett spent part of Friday afternoon jailed while a child support referee decided how to split up the $400 he brought to court.

If he doesn't pay what he owes, he will go back to jail because he is on an automatic jail order.

The mothers of Hatchett's children are supposed to get anywhere from $25 to $309 a month, but when his paycheck is garnished amongst them all, some women only get a $1.98 a month.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

goodlove, I'm not going to quote your post to Jordan because it's been reported and hopefully will be removed. You've now gone from broad generalizations to making specific attacks on Jordan, which is completely inappropriate. Whereas you have laid your specific situation out on this forum many times, Jordan has not and therefore you don't know any of the circumstances of her personal life and it's not your place to speculate, or flat out lie to try to make your poorly conceived and badly argued point.

As you've been told, time and time again, not all women are like the women you apparently know. Thinking that they are just pretty much ensures that's the only type you'll ever meet. Perhaps this attitude of yours is part of the reason you've had bad experiences? You reap what you sow.

To the OP, I apologize for the thread detour. So my thoughts on the various permutations of the topics discussed in this thread in a nutshell: I believe some people have God given talent, and Tiger is one of them. If it was all a matter of luck or training, more people could do it. I'm sure on any given day a certain amount of chance enters the equation, however if he didn't have such amazing talent to begin with, chance would be irrelevant. On the Elin thing, I don't care who the woman dates, and maybe as has been suggested previously she is simply attracted to WM and BM. As for the money, I don't think she *deserves* anything. He offered and she accepted, that was their deal. Had he not offered then my personal opinion would have been that she should receive child support, but no alimony unless that was in the prenup. Again it was the man with the money's decision to deviate from that, and as it is his money, that's his business.

 

yeah, true but what true value do they bring (entertainment). did it increase your wealth, knowledge or spiritual growth or well being in some way. no. this what we called misplaced values.

we dog out athletes getting paid 10 million a season (some 250000) but the owners are getting 10X more and all they do is sit on their butts.

They are nothing more than the modern paid slaves. dancing when they score like a bunch of jigga boos. fuck ocho fucko and terrible owns and jerry "pimp" jones.

 

:smt038:smt038:smt038

Brilliant post, Espy!

I was lurking on this thread reading these posts, I have no opinion about the whole thing, so I'll just sit back, laugh and read.

 

Because if two people are in a battle and only one of them is fighting, THAT ONE WILL WIN. People go after what is important to them.

 

lets be clear yall didnt say shit we she was saying shut the fuck up. stop whining no shit like that. now when she started getting personal I didnt say shit in the beginning. but when i come back OOOHHHH he is an asshole. so what you need to do is go back and read and see that they were getting personal from the beginning and you will see I never came back until now with personal shit. go and read and then say what you need to say but if you are going to be lay some law down then do it on the rite people at the rite time. that is what adults do. also people are making generalizations all over the place but when GL do it its the end of the world.

as far as experiences EVERYONE goes thru shit. hell, if thats the case jesus was an asshole according to what you are saying.

also where did I say anything about elin, especially who she is dating white or black.

as far as the money that is what Im talking about. she should get child support.

 

Thanks for the support espy. He's ..... awww I won't say it. He already sunk his reputation boat by passing out negatives with other peoples names instead of leaving it blank or being a man and signing his own work. That says his character right there.

People aren't reading. Tiger and Elin worked a deal. I bet Tiger ran out of the court clicking his heels that he got off for what he did. She could have gone after a greater portion with the threat of bringing down his reputation more than he already did himself. The case is closed .............everywhere in the free world but on wwbm!!!!! The battle rages on between Elin vs Tiger (plus his band of wwbm guys) here. Let it go.

 

I for one support athletes pay. Their career timeline is very short. They have to make it while they are in their prime. Hopefully they last and invest wisely.

 

Sellout Rhetoric + Equating unapologetic attraction with subservience was to show the type of rhetoric you were using (against me). It's hard to see how that response can be perceived otherwise.

This was a response to you specifically saying: "the broads on this forum are used to getting their ass kissed", not a summary/generalization of whatever points being made.

The only thing that I've specifically argued in “the worst thread of the year” is that:

1.It's the worst thread of the year.
2.The “Lucky Tiger” equation is absurd.
3.Elin's social status is being belittled relative to Tigers.
4.This couple does not fit the “ran back to” scenario you postulated; that scenario being a generalization too often used to defame IR. The “ran back to” scenario was your initial point. I have no interest to define this couple based on their individual merits, and I take issue with either being relegated.

I would defend any Black women to the point of Tiger's infidelity. I don't and never get involved in discussions on divorce proceedings.

I also further assert that if Elin was Black, I would not be defending her societal worth Vis-à-vis that of a star “Black” athlete. Given, like White male star athletes in mono-racial relationships, Black star male athletes frequently marry/couple with Black women of lower stations. Some people are quick to notice the imbalance with IR; not only does the White woman have to be beautiful, but accomplished.

As I far as my involvement in whatever constitutes an “anti bw thread”.... If those are the ones I'm constantly calling you out for erroneously claiming them as such, by all means we'll see each other in the next one

....or maybe you will start a thread crying over a kerry washington dating White men.

 

aaaahhhhh

 

Hey X, he forgot to put the exclamation mark (!) at the end of the thread title. That would have made the thread even worse!

 

goodlove, I can read just fine. All I can say is the same thing I always say when anyone is going on and on about being mistreated, when the evidence doesn't support that assertion... saying you're a victim, and playing the victim, does not make you the victim.

Jordan essentially told you to do something about your situation, or stfu. That's pretty much the same thing I said to you. What you replied back to her was full of judgments and assumptions about her personal life, which is inappropriate. I do see double-standards and hypocrisy on this forum, however this isn't one of those instances. IMO if you feel the need to resort to making it personal, rather than discussing the issue at hand on it's own merits, then it's time to log off. There is no reason to bring comments about someone's personal life, appearance, children, etc. into a discussion, that's just a bullshit move to deflect from the fact that you either don't know what you're talking about, you aren't able to articulate it, or you don't feel capable of carrying on an adult discussion. You may seek to discredit, demean, or belittle the other person, but all you succeed in doing is undermining your own credibility.

 

if you can read just fine then you need to take further classes.

Im gonna tell you this. Telling people to stfu is fucked up. I never went in on her period. Now, I never stated that it was my situation. she assumed. I was saying it happens to men all the time but yet at the sametime women whine (like you guys say) about C/s and men not spending time with the kids. so If she can make assertions that are unfounded then Im gonna do the same.

also look who is talking about carrying on an adult convo when you are "doing the same" I never called anyone out or told them stfu. when you guys demean people its cool nothing stated. so you stfu miss queen. talking about someones personal life.....Hello I never mentioned someones personal life until YOU GUYS BROUGHT MINE UP. two people brought theirs up and I didnt put them down I stated and add on men not seeing their kids. so you really need to back the hell up and check yourself

 

Careful sexy legs. Good honest logic like that might get you attacked

 

It's the worst thread based on the bickering/subtext, not terrorstars initial "she ran back to a White guy with Tiger's money" BS.

She's spent the better part of her adult relationship life with this one man, what is she running back to, her high school boyfriend? :smt009

 

who cares if she is with a white man. shit. TW fucked it up

 

She traded up to a billionaire. If she's a gold digger she's really good at it lol

 

What the hell. Tiger like many "men of color" are literally being taken to the bank by all women of colors. They will never learn.

 

Clearly someone's reading comprehension skills are lacking here, I don't dispute that. So I'll say this and then I'm putting you on ignore. You have aired your dirty laundry, so to speak, all over the forum. It would be nearly impossible for anyone to not be familiar with your personal situation goodlove. So any comments you make that tie into your personal situation are likely to be considered in light of that situation. Expecting people to forget about that, when you've been so blatant at sharing it at every opportunity, or expecting them to not see that all your comments about women wanting child support and denying visitation are directly related to, and prompted by your situation, is illogical.

You appear to get fixated easily, on situations and people you don't like, and you literally just run it in the ground. Things like creating multiple aliases and leaving negative rep with other people's names are indicative of your ability to not let go and to resort to whatever means possible when you don't agree with someone. It's childish, goodlove, ridiculously so. After a point, it just becomes impossible to take someone seriously, or to respect anything they say, regardless of whether it has merit of not.

I think that's enough thread-jacking for me, again my apologies to the OP.

 

marry right and make it work