I'm just trying to help you out. You don't have to judge people openly on their appearance in their daily lives. Also, you didn't understand my comment. I have a technical way of typing and writing and you didn't comprehend correctly what I was saying. If you understand what I'm saying from my POV, you would have more prosperity in the real-world rather than dissapointment. I passed judgement on you based on how you act, not how you look.
Thanks for you help Mikey. Appreciate that. May I add that you took my opinion personally. I can tell. Never take what other people say on the internet personally. That is very immature. Moreover, when I said that the Kardashians were average looking to me, you took that as saying they were ugly. They are not unattractive at all. They are (in my opinion) just average looking. Where I live there are tons and tons of women who are better looking and it is common to see women that look better than they. But if they are drop dead gorgeous to you then fine. I'm not upset with you so why are you upset with my opinion. It's just an opinion. Don't get your drawers in a bunch over it. Now let's stop this right here and now. I do not care to converse with you on this thread any longer. You are on one of your ego trips and you really need to go entertain yourself with somebody else. Okay...sweetie?:smt058
Please look, the thread is going on right now: http://www.whitewomenblackmen.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17562
Are these the photos before or after she changed herself around? I wouldn't say anything negative based on how she looks.
1. We size, judge, and classify ppl everyday of the week in this world especially in good ole USA, based on looks, ethnicity, earnings, family name, schools, academic or athletics accomplishments, personality, friends, etc.... 2. Kardashians famous for being famous, the only decent looking out of them is kim. But Kim K aint special either, you can find a latin chic with her booty and looks anyday of the week in any major US city, so all these hoopla about her supposedly fake booty, I don’t get it. 3. Khole’s got great personality but looks like a man. Odom could have done much better. 4. Most folks don't consider the Kardashians as white. They consider Armenains as a yellow hispanic variety. 5. At the end of the day, got to give it to Kardashians kids tho, they are biz minded and raking millions (prolly have great mangers plus their mom seems to know entertaiment biz very well). Oh well, since they're making the dough, they're winners.
Ok, that's your opinion. (#1 and #3) What do you think of Bhayes perspective about things like this? I think he has made a thread before about this and expressed what he thought about how people perceive you.
Mikey. Reread my post. I say Kim. KIM. These pics are Khloe. There are three sisters. Confusing. :smt042
gotta agree with oh on this one oooppppps jordie...comments like that will have the men calling you catty :smt037
To me, tarsh, she was prettier before. No hate. People act like she is famous for no reason. I mean Christie Brinkley, Giselle Bundechen and other model types are famous for their looks alone. Why not Kim? I said if you say she isn't gorgeous as openheart did, you are sour grapes, because she is.
i completely agree with you jordie & have also in the past. it was shortly after that i believe it was karma that called us catty lol. that face has been worked over...even those lashes are fake
Ok my mistake, I think I've found the right ones. I have to respectfully disagree with you all. I think she deserves more than you all are giving her credit for. People have their own opinions anyway, so go ahead and say what you'd like. Just keep in mind with what I said in the other thread in the Ladies Room that is similar to this one. I think the whole thing makes no difference really, because everyone would be called "ugly/average" or whatever by someone else. I don't think anyone would think one person in particular has a universal appeal/liking to everyone. Slandering people based on what they look like should be discouraged in my opinion.
If I were to judge people on the way they look, as OpenHeart reiterated, I would probably say some crazy things about the women on here that would upset/confuse a lot of people on here. But that's not within my personality, and hence, I wouldn't do that. In response to your question, I think you probably just think she changed up her facial features to satisfy what the entertainment industry and the media wanted. Why do you think some women on the forum are reluctant to post photos of their faces on here? It's because of a breach of privacy and a possibility of criticism from other users.
I don't know. Who are you referring to and I will ask them. I think Kim definitely bowed to pressure and why? She was perfect before.
What I put in bold is what I found offensive. You found it as being agreeable. I'm not sure how you could agree with her bizarre claim, but I guess I can't really say anything, Tarshi. I don't want to say who does, but there are plenty of women here who won't post pics of their face and that's okay. To your second question, re-read Post #115, there's no agreement. We just believe different things about the same person's appearance.