Harvard Law Women Says Blacks Are Less Intelligent

Ok so of all the sources you could have used you used wikipedia. Yeah I'm done with this guy next.

 

:smt056 Some people just like to argue for the sake of arguing babe.

This is why I luv ya!

 

Im too dignified to respond to her

 

I just hate pseudo intellectuals who don't opperate within some frame of logic. If this is just some emotional rant for you that's cool but don't pass yourself off as scholarly when you're not. Its insulting to those of us who devoted time and money into actually learning how to thing pragmatically.

 

No, please, don't lose your cool

" Certain diseases attributed to a certain people has more to with geography than actual race"
So is skin color right?, isn't skin color a genetic trait?

" Btw I don't think blacks always have better voices I believe it has more to do with cultural disposition."
Well, black people do indeed have stronger voices, that's a scientific fact, you can't argue with facts sorry.

"Again your bs point about certain families being smarter is non sense. If that were true then the wealthy would have a monoply on genius and you would only hear about genius amongst the wealthiest of families."
That's what I'm saying, intelligence is at least partly genetic, not entirely but your genes definitely have something to do with your intelligence, that's indisputalbe, I just don't think it has to do with race, that's another story.

 

Yeah, but does it really matter if it's from wikipedia?.

 

So you like men who can make decisions huh lol

 

She has apologised, because she realises what she said was bullshit. However, I have always been intrigued by sprinters. Why has no white man ever gone below 10 seconds in 100 metres? Is it because Blacks of West african extraction have genetically superior muscles for sprinting?Or is there something else at play.

 

And this is why I call you out on being a pseudo intellectual because anyone who has gone to college knows that wikipedia is not a usable reference point.
Again as far as your assertions about certain things like black people having stronger voices I would love to see an article on that. Actually scratch that. I'm done good day to you sir.

 

Well, I'm certainly aware that wikipedia is not a reliable source as anyone can freely edit the articles, but it can be used as a reference point as long as you always check the source, wikipedia is great, just be careful, it's not like wikipedia is totally useless, it's a great site to get information.

 

No has more to do with slavery. You gotta remember slavery was 400 years of breeding the biggest strongest guys to work in the fields. We are genetically predisposed to being better athleletes. Not all of us mind you but a bigger population than the other races.

 

Possibly. If it was down to slavery I would have thought Blacks of West African descent would also dominate Worlds strongest man competitions, but as far as I know blacks do very poorly in these events.

 

Yet we normally win most of the bodybuilding competitions. That is a bit of mystery to me.

 

I believe it is because of the culture. From what I understand they tend to travel by foot more so than we do thus they may develop that muscle more so than we do. Im just guessing

 

Guess again.

 

Look this woman has no merit to stand on. The creator of the fundamentals of the I.Q. test has said something along the lines of this test(I.Q. test) not being a way to measure intelligence. Lets couple that with the Human brain being a mystery box on how it works. Environment plays a much larger role on how intellignet a being is. If you are not taught by a human, you are very likely to be less intelligent no matter the race or ethnicity. High Integellience spawns from having very good teachers. This is once again Sociology's lack of ability to use some manner of science.

If it isn't true, it is false. If it isn't false then it is true. This lady is clearly racist or at least has not heard of science.

 

What was that in response to LA?

 

Here is a bad arguement.

I don't rule out the possibility that there is a God either even though I'm a complete atheist. Now lets cross it with the quote.

the broadest definition of "atheist" is someone who has absolutely no belif in any form of deity, it's not just someone who REJECTS this possibility

I believe you meant to say agnostic. If you read these quotes, they conflict. An atheist is someone who has absolutely no belif in any form of deity, it's not just someone who REJECTS this possibility as stated. You however have not ruled out the belief in god so can not be an atheist. You can be agnostic as I am. I carry a similar belief as you do with god. Whatever or whoever created the universe is god.

 

This:

 

EXACTLY!