SANDRA BULLOCK IS A RACIST

Discussion in 'In the News' started by goodlove, Apr 7, 2010.

  1. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    He should have stuck to posting rap videos.
     
  2. FG

    FG Well-Known Member

    I ignore those so that would be just fine w me :smt036
     
  3. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    :smt008
     
  4. FG

    FG Well-Known Member

    :smt055
     
  5. wtarshi

    wtarshi Well-Known Member

    i was going to try and pussy block you with karma, but then decided that we can dress him in the school principals outfit, become naughty school girls and lock him in our room (has sumi left yet?) :smt026
     
  6. FG

    FG Well-Known Member

    :smt081:smt081:smt081
     
  7. Carter

    Carter Member

    SMH
    If he's getting exposed as someone called lexington........ it's called the lexington exposure. You must be slow or you need nap.
     
  8. FG

    FG Well-Known Member

    U crack me UUUPPPPPP!
    So do tell me all might one.. who is Lexington and why are you so involved in the Karma/Lippy discussion? Hmmmm???
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2010
  9. Carter

    Carter Member

    I don't know. Lipstick clearly explains who he was at page 11. Even if you'd just joined the forum yesterday and read lipsticks post, you would have an idea about his character.

    ?
    How is making 1 comment in this entire thread being "involved" ?

    Why are you "involving" yourself by replying to my original comment ?

    .
     
  10. GFunk

    GFunk Well-Known Member

    :smt042:smt042:smt042:smt042
     
  11. karmacoma.

    karmacoma. Well-Known Member

    Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not Lexington. She is on this board though under a different guise.

    Women and men scorned, SMH.
     
  12. FG

    FG Well-Known Member


    You are completely not getting it.
    :smt015
     
  13. goodlove

    goodlove New Member

    this is getting out of hand huh
     
  14. Dmacho

    Dmacho New Member

    They would if they got paid enough. Honesty, If you make a life with someone who supports a group of people who took millions of innocent lives, you're an enabler.

    Isn't enabling a racist,being racist ?
     
  15. Espy

    Espy New Member

    No it isn't, and enabling assumes you know the person you are with is a racist. Being a racist makes you a racist, knowing a racist doesn't make you one too. If you both know and approve of their racism, then I'd say that's racist.
     
  16. FG

    FG Well-Known Member

    that would be like saying:
    Isnt enabling an alcoholic, being an alcoholic?

    Just because you are an "enabler" doenst mean you fit the definition of racist.

    Btw, It doenst automatically make you an enabler either if you live with a racist and accept it...

    Makes you pretty damn weak, disgusting etc tho.
     
  17. Dmacho

    Dmacho New Member

    Bad analogy, Elin was the victim. Is a rape victim, who doesn't press charges, guilty by association ? If any of Tiger's or Elins friends or relatives knew about the affairs, you could say they're guilty by association.

    I was feeling sorry for Sandra, she was good in the Blindside, but now, I don't care about her at all.

    She played with fire, and she got burned.

    Good !
     
  18. Dmacho

    Dmacho New Member

    Apples and oranges, alcoholism is a disease that affects some people and not others. Some people can drink heavily and never get addicted, others can't. So it's possible to drink with an alcoholic and not become one yourself.

    If they didn't rule out having children together, than she, before he cheated, would've had no problem with having children with this bigot. She would've had no problem with the fact that her children, more than likely, would have been exposed to this type of bigotry.

    It's also clear that she doesn't associate with any non-white people at a close level, otherwise, how would you explain this to them ?
     
  19. FG

    FG Well-Known Member


    Wrong.
    Its not apples and oranges... its definitions of words.. that definition dont change. "Enabler" means one thing and one thing alone - same goes for "racist".
    I dont know what your comment about alcoholism has to do with anything so I leave that alone.

    In regards to possible kids - yes, it would be unforgivable to expose your kids to that type of upbringing - its disgusting, weak and stupid - but it doesnt make her a racist, unless she subscribe to racist ideas.

    I never liked her as the majority of her movies is in a gengre I dont care for and although I feel sorry for her on one level, I lost respect for her as well.
    I still wont call her a racis just yet.
     
  20. Dmacho

    Dmacho New Member

    It's not that simple; words don't change, but their context does. Alcoholism is a condition, where as racism is a belief. It's possible for me to drink with an alcoholic while not becoming an alcoholic myself. Racism is different: it's a belief that, if she had children with this man, she would have exposed her children to, knowingly. She would have played a part in passing racist ideals down to the next generation.

    Now how the hell can someone willingly pass down racist ideals to their children and not be racist ? Isn't that why racism still exist today, because people passed it down from the previous generations ?

    Hey, maybe I need to get out there more, because I always thought that preserving racism, or be willing to do so, while simultaneously being open-minded was impossible.

    Honestly, if she's not racist, and in my opinion she is, it's irrelevant. It's because of people like her, who pass racism on to the next generation, that race will be an issue for our great, great, great, great grandchildren. It's because of people like her that the only way racism will end, is when it's accompanied by Armageddon.

    By the way, I love your new pic. oxoxoxoxo!!

    What about marrying one ? What about making babies with one and exposing them to bigotry? What about possibly alienating any Jewish or non-white friends( if she ever had any) that she might have ?

    As far as the part in bold, isn't marrying a Neo Nazi, or whatever, knowing and approving of racism ?
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2010

Share This Page