European women really more "liberal" than US WW?

Despite that nasty avatar, you get +8.

 

Glad you like my av.

 

Wow. Touchy. Not only is the logic sound, but the statistics bear my point out as well. For the overwhelming majority of white women, they would prefer a white male over a black, Asian, Latino male, etc.

Therefore, in testing yourself against all men - you have to actually be far superior to white men that are also of "high-quality" (although your claims of quality are based on your own opinion, I'll play along). Furthermore, I would like to broaded my statement to include ALL REGIONS of the U.S. - not just the South. As a result of this, the number of BM-WW relationships are an incredibly small percentage in the U.S.

Sorry. Don't blame the messenger. It's reality.

 

I love these kinds of posters.

The recurring theme:

I can't get the kind of women I want, so I'm going to piss on everyone else's parade.

If your love life constitutes one failure after another, work on that shit in private but don't assume that the rest of us are similarly disadvantaged.

 

Well, I don't have a particular type or "want", (i.e. white women) so your argument is specious. Anyway, the fact that you're resulting to ad hominem attacks indicates that you are unable to refute the statistics.

I'm sure you have your choice of some of the most gorgeous white women available. Which is even more amazing considering that I'm assuming you're not an athlete, rapper, actor, etc.

You seem to have been quickly angered by my bringing up the reality/statistical fact of how small a percentage of relationships are interracial in the U.S. If anyone is raining on the parade it's that, not me.

 

Just as I suspected your ulterior motive was obvious from the jump. You want to obfuscate the issue to advance whatever agenda you're trying to peddle.

Also, I didn't mention any specific type of woman but it's obvious you're a failure because your language reflects it. And you never posted a single statistic to back up anything you're claiming, but here is one for you.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jD8_iPdwSvnTMYIcgpccnPsuJ5cQD98FH8GG0

So not only are people of different backgrounds, including black men and white women, intermarrying but they're also shifting the demographics of America by producing offspring.

Get your shit together before trying to debate me.

 

Oh, No! It's Making Well-Reasoned Arguments Backed With Facts! Run!


By Matthew Barnes
May 28, 2009 |



I…I think it's finally over. Our reactionary emotional response seems to have stopped it dead in its tracks. If I'm right, all we have to do now is smugly reiterate our half-formed thesis and—oh, no! For the love of God, no! It's thoughtfully mulling things over!

Run! Run! It's making reasonable, fact-based arguments!

Quickly! Hide behind self-righteousness! The ad hominem rejoinders—ready the ad hominem rejoinders! Watch out! Dodge the issue at hand! Question its character and keep moving haphazardly from one flawed point to the next!

All together now! Put every bit of secondhand conjecture into it you've got!

Goddamn it, nothing's working! It's trapped us in our own unsubstantiated claims! We need to switch fundamentally unsound tactics. Hurry, throw up the straw man! Look, I think it's going for it. C'mon…c'mon…yes, it's going for it! Now hit it with the thing that one guy told us once while it's distracted by our ludicrous rationalizations!

Gah! It's calmly and evenhandedly deflecting everything we're throwing at it. Our deductive fallacies are only making it stronger! Wait…what on earth is it doing now? Oh, no, it has sources! My God, it's defending itself with ironclad sources! Someone stop the citing! Please, please stop the citing!
The language is impenetrable! For all that is good and holy, backpedal with all your might!

Where are the children? Someone overprotect the children! They cannot be exposed to this kind of illuminative reasoning. Their young, open minds are much too vulnerable to independent thought. We have to shield them behind our unshakeable intolerance for critical thinking.
What?!? Noooooooooo! Richard! For the love of God, it's convinced Richard!

No time for tears now. Richard's mind has been changed forever. But we mustn't let it weaken our resolve. Mark my words, our ignorance will hold, no matter the cost. Now, more than ever, we have to keep floundering ahead with blind faith in our increasingly fallacious worldview.
For Richard's sake.

What's that? Now it's making an appeal to reason? Never! Do you hear me, you eloquent, well-read behemoth? Never! We'll die before we recognize what we secretly know to be true! The cognitive dissonance only makes our denial stronger!

We have but one hope left: passive-aggressive slights disguised as impersonal discourse.† Okay, everyone, careful now…careful…if this is going to work, we have to arrogantly assume that it won't be smart enough to catch on to our attempt to salvage some feeling of superiority and—oh, God, it's calling us out! Quick, avoid eye contact and stammer an apology! Tell it we were just joking! Tell it we were joking!

Arrgh! Our pride! Oh, Lord, our pride! It burns!

All is lost. We don't stand a chance against its relentless onslaught of exhaustive research and immaculate rhetoric. We may as well lie down and—Christ, how it pains me to say it—admit that it's right. My friends, I would like to take these last few moments of stubborn close-mindedness to say that it's been an honor to dig myself into this hole with you.

Unless…wait, of course! Why didn't we think of it before? Volume! Sheer volume! It's so simple. Quickly now, we don't have much time! Don't let it get a word in edgewise! Derisively cut it off mid-sentence! Now, launch the sophomoric personal attacks! Louder, yes, that's it, louder! Be repetitive, juvenile, and obstinate! It's working! It's working!

We've done it! It's walking away and shaking its head in disgust! Huzzah! Finally—defeated with a single three-minute volley of irrelevant, off-topic shouting!

Ironic, really, isn't it?

 

The future of Blacks looks bleak in this country.

 

You should have said that the percentage black/white interracial coupling was low.Its the least occurring

 

Simple Truth:

There are no absolutes.
If you meet someone and they're cool, then they're cool.
If they are not, they are not.
Stop overthinking it.

 

Interesting. I'm not sure how you can ascribe "personal failure" by what I have written - and yet you continue with the ad hominem attacks. The reason why I posted no statistics is because:

1. The statistics are available to anyone who searches.

2. I use common sense, reason, research and observation.

However I appreciate you posting the 5.2 million statistic...
out of a 300 million + population....cause it proves my point.

Thanks!

Sad that you consider a statement of fact an "agenda". I do believe that you have been on this message board too long, therefore, I will try and disabuse you of some erroneous beliefs.

1. There are white women who date/in relationships with black men.

2. Those numbers are small in comparison to total numbers of the U.S. population.

3. Most groups (including white women) tend to date within/marry their own race.

4. White women, by and large, are not swooning over black men, nor do they seek them out specifically. Some do (percentage-wise) but most don't.

All of the above is revealed by your statistic. Thanks again!:smile:

You seem to be really angry about these realities. I suggest you take some time to reflect on why this is so.

 

Read what I wrote again. I said exactly that (ie. the percentages were small/low).

"You seem to have been quickly angered by my bringing up the reality/statistical fact of how small a percentage of relationships are interracial in the U.S."

What is unclear about the above statement? "How small a percentage" means "low".

 

Jesus.

 

Exactly.

 

Again. Thanks for the statistical help. Good lookin' out!

 

hello karmacoma

 

Thank you Sarah23

 

How are you today?

 

I am fine, how are you?

 

I'm fine but I'm finding the forum a bit boring lately.